similar to: [Bug 1196] New: nft does not allow comments within sets: Error: syntax error, unexpected newline

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Bug ID: 1347 Summary: ebtables-nft: regression in -o option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1394 Bug ID: 1394 Summary: "Bad argument `ACCEPT'" when iptables-restore (nft) parses stdin Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9462 89

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073 Bug ID: 1073 Summary: inet-service vs icmp conflict Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Bug ID: 1298 Summary: Issue with REJECT in custom chains Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1383 Bug ID: 1383 Summary: When using include, nft shows the wrong file name in errors Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965 Summary: Deleting rules using "position" keyword deletes all rules for chain Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1087 Bug ID: 1087 Summary: Window Tracking not disabled Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon Assignee: netfilter-buglog

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Bug ID: 1290 Summary: ptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162 Bug ID: 1162 Summary: oops in nft_rbtree_insert Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1400 Bug ID: 1400 Summary: "COMMIT expected at line ..." when iptables-restore 1.8.4 (nft) parses stdin with empty lines Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9495

Hello, I've recently setup a small load test against an instance of Asterisks. I've tested on asterisk 13.5 and 14.6 with the same results. I am using PJSIP. My dial plan is, [test] exten => 1001,1,Answer exten => 1001,n,MusicOnHold(15) exten => 1001,n,Hangup I am using SIPP to test. I can share XML if desired but it simply waits on the line while music plays for 8

2023-11-08 18:14:13] ERROR[571246][C-000017e2] : Got 19 backtrace records # 0: [0x5bd18a] asterisk utils.c:2800 __ast_assert_failed() # 1: [0x4618e3] asterisk astobj2.c:589 __ao2_ref() # 2: [0x58e660] asterisk stasis_cache.c:824 update_create() # 3: [0x58efed] asterisk stasis_cache.c:903 caching_topic_exec() # 4: [0x586b90] asterisk stasis.c:1380 dispatch_message() # 5: [inlined] asterisk

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1445 Bug ID: 1445 Summary: conntrackd: segfaults when not disabling internal cache Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1292 Bug ID: 1292 Summary: issue with -f fragment option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1310 Bug ID: 1310 Summary: syntax issue with tproxy Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286 Bug ID: 1286 Summary: -Z regression Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi Richard, Thank you for the reply Correct, I did mean 13.15. I set no optimize and better backtrace through "make menuselect" and the output is now [Aug 28 21:41:16] ERROR[17171][C-0000392d]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x21962b0 (0) Got 26 backtrace records #0: [0x61923f] main/utils.c:2475

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1361 Bug ID: 1361 Summary: nft segfault on overlapping intervals Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

Hi all, We have already bought 30 Digium G.729 licenses to install in several machines, but Digium only has provided on key to use in registration. We suspect that the registration has assigned the whole 30 licenses to the same server. Do anyone know how to distribute the licenses among several servers? Thanks in advance. -- Arturo D?az Contact me on FWD: 870436 Skype: arturo.diaz.almagro

Quiero comparar varias dosis letales 50% (LD50) usando análisis probit. He seguido un ejemplo que viene en paquete DRC, pero no obtengo el resultado esperado. Lo que quiero es saber si las LD50s, son diferentes y si la diferencias son estadísticamente significativas. Gracias de antemano. José Arturo e-mail. jafarfan@uady.mx <grejon@uady.mx> e-mail alterno. jafarfan@gmail.com