similar to: [Bug 1097] New: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables

Hi, I have three squeeze servers running: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the e1000e driver and the other two use the igb driver. They've been in production for around 6 months now

Hi, I have three Debian squeeze servers running: ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-38 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs, Xen dom0 support ii xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 4.0.1-4 The Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 All three servers have Intel gigabit NICs, but one server uses the e1000e driver and the other two use the igb driver. They''ve been in production for around 6

Has anyone been successful at using the TARPIT target in iptables under CentOS 4? I am using CentOS 4.3, fully updated with iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 and kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 Doing a locate on TARPIT returns: # locate TARPIT /lib/iptables/libipt_TARPIT.so This makes me think that the TARPIT target would be valid, however when I try to use it, I get the following reponse: # iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 Summary: -m psd -j TARPIT returns all ports open from nmap Product: iptables userspace Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78 ------- Additional Comments From tools@die.net 2003-04-17 15:47 ------- Showing any ports open that are sent to it is the normal function of TARPIT target. The psd match will start routing all ports to it after it decides that an IP is portscanning, so this is the expected behavior. That being said, the psd match won't

Em 10-09-2018 10:43, Rowland Penny via samba escreveu: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:56:46 -0400 > spiderslack via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> I trying setting domain samba with bind9-DLZ. I followed the tutorial >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller, >> but not

... Hello! I completed a simple userspace tarpit script: http://www.radlinux.org/connexion/browser/branches/0.4.4/lib/cxnet It is not a production solution, but an example of cxnet usage. Whilst not as fast as libnfnetlink and kernel netfilter, cxnet is extremely simple and can be used for rapid net-apps development or in GNU/Linux network studies (e.g., for educational purposes). Cxnet

Hi, all I trying setting domain samba with bind9-DLZ. I followed the tutorial https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller, but not work. see the tests bellow ricardobarbosa at isadora:~$ bash tools/testSambaRecords.sh Host _ldap._tcp.freewaynet.corp not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Host _kerberos._udp.freewaynet.corp not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Host

Hi, I haven't been to find this (NetworkManager) change documented. On: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE ens32 7629e52d-bd42-4cd5-a424-8c58e7e0bf37 802-3-ethernet ens32 On: CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940 Summary: ip6tables-save output invalid rule when using D/SNPT Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

On 17 December 2015 at 06:06, Eugene Vilensky <evilensky at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't been to find this (NetworkManager) change documented. > > On: > > CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) > > $ /bin/nmcli con > NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE > ens32 7629e52d-bd42-4cd5-a424-8c58e7e0bf37 802-3-ethernet

TL;DR: Is there a way to force a bridge to forward anything and everything on all ports (except the ingress port) *regardles* of any permanent FDB entries (such as the MAC addresses of interfaces acting as bridge ports)? For context, I'm using a network-namespace (container) based simulator (think GNS3 or CORE), which allow me to run multiple FRR instances in their own dedicated netns,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1343 Bug ID: 1343 Summary: With iPv6 masquerade, ICMPv6 time-exceeded pkts are forwarded with bad checksum Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Hi, I am trying to install some additional iptables modules on a CentOS 5 Box (imq, tarpit, geoip). Can anyone recommend a version of patch-o-matic-ng that works well with the CentOS 5 kernel sources (2.6.18-8.1.4)? The most current version (patch-o-matic-ng-20070521.tar.bz2) does not compile. With patch-o-matic-ng-20061128.tar.bz2 I could at least get tarpit working but geoip and imq seem

See inline comments: On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:14:43 +0200 Udo Willke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So, to summarize the discussion: > > System accounts should not have rfc2307 IDs, only (unprivileged) > users should. The Administrator account is the exception. It can be > mapped to root trough the "username map" directive Basically yes, you can also

Hi, I''ve been working the past 8 hrs combatting DDoS attacks on websites and dedicated servers I host for clients. They''re hitting one specific IP address, but coming from thousands of external IP addresses. I use: shorewall-4.0.10-3.noarch How can I tackle this? I''ve blocked many subnets in the blacklist file but it''s made very little difference. If

Hello Rowland, Am 14.10.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:52:33 +0200 > Udo Willke via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> However it is not very specific as to what permissions should >> actually be configured: "Go to the "Security" tab, click the "Edit" >> button and configure the

There is the mail_max_userip_connections setting, which helps for dealing with number of connections at any given time, but I'm looking for something that will help deal with users who configure their mail clients to connect too frequently. For example, I've seen users who configured their clients to check (IMAP) mail every 3 seconds. This is far too frequent and puts unnecessary load on

On 09/15/2018 10:41 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Point of sending the success ones is to maintain whitelist as well as > blacklist so you know which ones you should not tarpit anymore. We > know it does scale as we have very large deployments using the whole > three request per login model. > > "Success" in a proxy which is not it self authenticating is only whether it know

On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. > I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security in the absolute sense, but they slow the attacker down, and that might