similar to: [Bug 1088] New: activation.avg.com 1.8.0.0.9.6.9.1.6.4.9

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1080 Bug ID: 1080 Summary: call ^^18557^O92^847^^@@ Epson printer customer care phone number Product: bugzilla Version: other Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: netfilter

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2724 Bug ID: 2724 Summary: HELPppPP ><<>Hp< Printer 1800 790 9186)) Hp phone number Hp printer support phone number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870 Summary: Iptables cannot block outbound packets sent by Nessus Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2596 Bug ID: 2596 Summary: Brother printer (((1~855~709~2847))) Technical Support Phone Number Brother Printer Customer Care Phone Number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2597 Bug ID: 2597 Summary: Epson printer (((1~855~709~2847))) Technical Support Phone Number Epson Printer Customer Care Phone Number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW

Well I know from personal experience that NuFone is working on a solution for its customers as fast as it can. I know they found an alternate termination provider and are working to have a solution for the TF and Local DID's he currently has on his platform. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2595 Bug ID: 2595 Summary: Remembering Call @+**((18557092847)) Epson Printer DESK .Epson Printer US~~HELpS tech support number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Hello R users,  I am trying to obtain a direct adjusted survival curve. I am sending my whole code (see below). It's basically the larynx cancer data with Stage 1-4. I am using the cox model using coxph option, see the fit3 coxph. When I use the avg.surv option on fit3, I get the following error: "fits<-avg.surv(fit3, var.name="stage.fac", var.values=c(1,2,3,4), data=larynx)

Well, I would suggest using the code already in place in the survival package. Here is my code for your problem. I'm using a copy of the larynx data as found from the web resources for the Klein and Moeschberger book. larynx <- read.table("larynx.dat", skip=12, col.names=c("stage", "time", "age", "year",

Hi We deployed centos 4.8 on HP DL380 G2, G3 and G4 servers (same number of cpus). The same software is running on all servers. Only on G2 servers we see a low cpu utilization combined with high load-average. For example, during the same time of day and same workload, on a G2 I see a l-avg of 11.31 and on a G4 I see 2.68. The server response time seems unchanged and we don't have any problem

Hi, Running samba sernet 4.1.6-7, I've noticed the load avg slowly / steadily creeping up (.e.g > 100). I'm now noticing that several smbd processes are at 100%. I don't actually notice that much bandwidth usage on the system (e.g. iptraf/iftop). Any idea what's causing this? Restarting smbd helps for a few days, but then the high load avg returns. Thanks, Sabuj

Is anyone running v 1.2.3 and have clients with AVG email scanning? I upgraded a server a few weeks ago (which ran Dovecot and the Maildir mail store), and all of a sudden clients with AVG were unable to use POP. Essentially, AVG freezes. The server upgrade was from FreeBSD 7 to OpenSolaris 2009.06, and I did upgrade the Dovecot version from 1.1.17 to 1.2.3, but kept the same config.

Thanks every one first. I have a dataset like this Year Month Day Hour DIR SPD (m/s) SKYCOVER TEMP (C) RH(%) 2009 1 1 0 310 13.85824 3 -5 23 2009 1 1 1 330 14.30528 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 2 320 10.72896 3 -7.222222222 24 2009 1 1 3 320 10.72896 3 -6.666666667 23 2009 1 1 4 320 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 5 330 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 6 330 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 25 2009

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2616 Bug ID: 2616 Summary: quickbooks phone support ,quickbooks support phone number,quickbooks help 1877 778 8714 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.3p1 Hardware: 68k OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Well this is disappointing. Time to find somebody else... -- Wes -----Original Message----- From: NuFone Operations [mailto:support@nufone.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 3:44 PM To: wbaehr@totalmac.net Subject: NuFone Update: DIDs Effective 3pm EST Today, April 18th, 2006 Telesthetic, the carrier supporting the Toll-Free and Michigan DID operations of NuFone, has threatened to terminate

Hi, I ve been searching a lot in internet..but I can t find a solution Attached, you find a file. I need for each (Materiale, tpdv, UM) to find sum,avg and count My idea was to aggregate for the 3 parameters ..but I don t know how to get the numeric value (SUM,COUNT,AVG) I need. Can you help me? thank you http://www.nabble.com/file/p22905322/ordini2008_ex.txt ordini2008_ex.txt -- View this

Full_Name: Jan Somorcik Version: 2.6.0 OS: Windows XP HOME Submission from: (NULL) (158.195.31.33) I used to run a simulation with 5000 iterations. For a long time everything was OK, but since yesterday R stops after 500-1500 iterations [never at the same position] with an [random?] Error message [always something else, e.g.: Error in ans[[i]] <- tmp : incorrect number of arguments to

Hi all, I was wondering if there is a function out there, or someone has written code for making confidence intervals around model averaged predictions (y~á+âx). The model average estimates are from the dRedging library? It seems a common thing but I can't seem to find one via the search engines Examples of the models are: fit1 <- glm(y~ dbh, family = binomial, data = data) fit2 <-

Hi, The measurements were created under the following conditions : ? operating system : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.6 (Santiago) kernel in version 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 ? virtual server (VMware) with an Intel(R) Xeon(R) 4vCPU E5649 x 2,526 GHz (2 cores per virtual socket) and 4 GB RAM ? 7,200 RPM SATA 1TB (FC SAN IBM System Storage N3400) ? all file systems had been formated in