similar to: [Bug 1063] New: sizes for ipv6 priority and flow label are incorrect.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172 Bug ID: 1172 Summary: chain priority cannot be set by a defined variable Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140 Bug ID: 1140 Summary: nft dump invalid (flow table) Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1281 Bug ID: 1281 Summary: Using kernel 4.18.10, nft commandline tool or nft -f can't parse negative priority values over -200. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: critical

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295 Bug ID: 1295 Summary: Access decision from previous priority Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1254 Bug ID: 1254 Summary: nft commandline tool can't parse negative priority values. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

Despite that the migration of our applications comes with a significant workload. It seems that also every aspect of common services had changed with EL8. In EL8 firewalld uses nftables as backend. I wonder why iptables does not list any rules while also configured to use nftables as backend. # iptables -V iptables v1.8.2 (nf_tables) # firewall-cmd --list-all |egrep -o '22|ssh' ssh

Hi everyone, I use Debian 9.5 Stretch and NFTABLES as a firewall. Using NFTABLES together with IPTABLES is not recommended, but libvirt depends on IPTABLES. Is it safe to run libvirt + kvm + virsh without IPTABLES? By the doc https://libvirt.org/firewall.html, IPTABLES are used for settingup filtering which I do not need. Thanks, Roman

Once upon a time, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> said: > 'iptables' and 'nftables' are competing technologies. In CentOS 8, > firewalld's backend was switched from iptables to nftables. So it > would be expected that the iptables command wouldn't have any rules > defined, it isn't being used by firewalld. That is partially incorrect.

On 10/18/2018 10:14 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:57:11PM +0200, Roman Vesely wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I use Debian 9.5 Stretch and NFTABLES as a firewall. >> Using NFTABLES together with IPTABLES is not recommended, >> but libvirt depends on IPTABLES. >> >> Is it safe to run libvirt + kvm + virsh without IPTABLES?

On 1/30/19 10:05 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > Did you look at Shorewall? IMHO that's what is best used in such > situations and it works since many years now. shorewall doesn't support nftables, which is largely the point of firewalld:? The Linux firewall system is currently undergoing yet another deprecation and migration from iptables to nftables. firewalld should

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1216 Bug ID: 1216 Summary: Error messaging for "interval overlaps with previous one" misidentifies location Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1135 Bug ID: 1135 Summary: When used as a script interpreter, nft fails if extra arguments are passed Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi list, I'm studying nftables. I'm using CentOS 8.1 (Gnome) and I disabled firewalld. I noticed that a default policy is created with tables and chains probably for firewalld. So I created a .nft script where I stored my rules with a flush for previous ruleset, then saved on /etc/sysconfig/nftables.conf and the enabled nftables service. Running the script with nft -f script.nft all

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1145 Bug ID: 1145 Summary: nft 0.7: expression.c:966: range_expr_value_low: Assertion '0' failed. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1365 Bug ID: 1365 Summary: nft crashes in chain_print_declaration() Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1359 Bug ID: 1359 Summary: nft 0.9.1 - table family inet, chain type nat, fails to auto-load modules Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176 Bug ID: 1176 Summary: Invalid identifiers produce unhelpful error messages Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1263 Bug ID: 1263 Summary: Device or resource busy on nat loading. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1210 Bug ID: 1210 Summary: nftables gets confused by user namespaces when meta skuid is used Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Bug ID: 1256 Summary: Default ruleset files with tables are no longer installed after 0.8.3 version Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5