similar to: [Bug 1047] Creating expectation entry using conntrack tool results in ESHUTDOWN

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757 Summary: SIP connection helper not setting RTCP conntrack expectation Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_conntrack

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > submitter 192827 Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com> Bug #192827 [xdiskusage] xdiskusage: Printing doesn't manage non-ASCII characters Changed Bug submitter to 'Jos? Luis Gonz?lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>' from 'Jos?? Luis Gonz??lez <jlgonzal at ya.com>' > submitter 208308 R?diger Kuhlmann

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792 Summary: ip_conntrack keep updating incorrect entry in conntrack table after default routing changed Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component:

The NBD specification was clarified to state that the server can send ESHUTDOWN at any time that it wants to inform the client that the server is about to close the connection and that all further commands will fail, to give the client a chance to first send NBD_CMD_DISC for a clean shutdown. While nbdkit does not (yet) directly send this errno, it is feasible that a plugin may want this error

Howdy. I have observed a horrific performance problem in my setup. I'm running samba on a Linux Fedora Core 1 machine with Windows clients. The samba server is communicating with a Windows 98 machine. $ /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.4-1.FC1 The configuration of my server is mostly default with the exception of print, passwords, and share configurations. My Linux interface is seeing about

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch do_ifup() in network-bridge exits badly, if the interface doesn't have a default gateway. Since it's wrapped in xen's locking script it causes it to be retied 100 times and sleep for 95 seconds before it continues. In my setup this amounts to: 16 vlans without a default gateway * 95 secs / bridge = 25 minutes

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1116 Bug ID: 1116 Summary: Can't create Ipv6 NAT entries with conntrack Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack Assignee:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875 Summary: iptables -m conntrack --ctstatus NONE,EXPECTED is not consistent with --ctstatus SEEN_REPLY,EXPECTED Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables

Hello, I need to understand how conntrack_core.c handles the termination of ''expected'' connection; handling in the case when ''expected'' connection arrived, then terminates (In my conntrack module, I need to specially handle the event of termination termination of ''expected'' connection.) In ip_conntrack_core.c, I can''t find the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 Summary: sparc64 conntrack issue with expecting related connections, FTP Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

the establishment of an openvpn link sometimes fails. I tracked it down to network traffic with wrong Sourceport in the answer packet (should be 1300 not 1024): 2 1.119309000 aaa.185.165 bbb.162.192 UDP 58 Source port: 1300 Destination port: 1300 3 1.119446000 bbb.162.192 aaa.185.165 UDP 66 Source port: 1024 Destination port: 1300 and a collateral entry in the connection tracking table

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

Hi Team, I am using QEMU/KVM for launching VMs and libvirt to govern those VMs. I would like to synchronise the connection tracking entries specific to the VM during the VM LIVE migrations. It is required when the firewall is implemented at the host level like libvirt's "network filters". If stateful firewall is enabled, then unless these connection tracking entries are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Shane <arlenslambert at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #134 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Assignee|laforge at netfilter.org

Typically (or at least somewhat occasionally) after a reboot of my shorewall[-lite] machine I find that I end up with conntrack table entries for unNATted connections such as: # conntrack -L -p udp --dport 5060 -d 99.232.11.14 udp 17 59 src=10.75.22.8 dst=99.232.11.14 sport=5060 dport=5060 packets=5472 bytes=3031488 [UNREPLIED] src=99.232.11.14 dst=10.75.22.8 sport=5060 dport=5060 packets=0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:53:57 +0200 > Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > 1. The Windows client user "Admin" has mounted samba share with > > > username > > "production" and can access any files on that share. Why does Samba

On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:53:57 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > 1. The Windows client user "Admin" has mounted samba share with > > username > "production" and can access any files on that share. Why does Samba > start messing with other/unknown usernames? Should I create a > Linux/Samba "Admin" user? I

I am thankful for all support received so far and I feel I'm getting closer to a solution. To get back to basics and a more transparent setup I have made a clean Ubuntu 16.04 installation and followed this guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Standalone_Server Windows clients users are logged in with username Admin (local account, administrator). The samba share is