Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[Bug 992] New: Missing space between NFQUEUE extra parameters"
2014 May 13
0
[Bug 939] New: extensions: NFQUEUE: missing cpu-fanout
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=939
Summary: extensions: NFQUEUE: missing cpu-fanout
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: ip_tables (kernel)
AssignedTo:
2019 Feb 13
1
[Bug 1322] New: Accepting in an nfqueue breaks multi-chain processing
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1322
Bug ID: 1322
Summary: Accepting in an nfqueue breaks multi-chain processing
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: kernel
Assignee: pablo at
2011 Dec 27
1
Netfilter QUEUE (NFQUEUE) Support on XEN based VPS
Hi all,
I have been trying to run an IDS system on OpenVZ based VPS which requires that I run this IPTABLES command :
iptables -A FORWARD -j NFQUEUE
However, so far I have not suceeded. I always get this errors:
iptables: Unknown error 4294967295
Even when the NFQUEUE IP modules was enabled by the VPS provider, I still get these errors and this appears to be OpenVZ bug.
So I want to
2024 Apr 03
9
[Bug 1742] New: using nfqueue breaks SCTP connection (tracking)
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1742
Bug ID: 1742
Summary: using nfqueue breaks SCTP connection (tracking)
Product: libnetfilter_queue
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: libnetfilter_queue
Assignee:
2008 Sep 24
1
[Bridge] bridge is not forwarding the packet
Hi Rahul,
If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you
might want to have a look at this:
---
(From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html
<http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> )
How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the
other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port?
Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.
2013 Apr 11
1
[Bug 778] NFQUEUE --queue-bypass accepts all packets when no userspace application is available
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778
Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |fw at strlen.de
--- Comment #1 from Florian Westphal
2009 Jan 19
1
Non-linear skbs apparently prevent NFQUEUE from working properly
Dear list members (especially Xen network wizards),
I''m using the netfilter_queue mechanism to modify packets on the wire that
are sent from one domU to another while they travel over the dom0 bridge.
This has worked fine as long as I was tinkering with UDP packets only -
but when I try to reinject TCP frames with an increased length, I run into
a BUG() because
2009 Mar 20
1
[Bridge] BRCTL is displaying only 32 bridge interfaces even /proc/net/dev is showing more then that
Hi All,
I am using Linux 2.6.15 kernel. I want to create 4094 bridge interface but I am able to see only 32 bridge interfaces with the help of "brctl show". I am able see other interfaces into /proc/net/dev but brctl is not showing more then 32. It is also not allowing any operations (add/del) over those interfaces. Is it correct behaviour or I have do some changes in some settings.?
2007 Nov 20
3
Shorewall 4.1.0
I''ve opened up development of Shorewall 4.1.
While I had previously announced that Shorewall 4.1 would focus on IPv6, I
have since learned that the netfilter team are developing ''xtables'', a
unified IP0v4/IPv6 utility. It seems silly to spend the effort to add
Shorewall support for IPv6 only to then have to turn around and convert it
to use xtables. So I''ve
2005 May 05
2
Please help
Hi
I am a novice and need to know how to compile glibc (glibc-2.0.6)
under an i686, redhat 9,
in order to install wine-20050310. The package does not install
otherwise. Is there any other alternative (like older package
versions, I don't know where to find one).
2013 Aug 02
1
[Bug 837] New: Large ICMP packets are lost
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=837
Summary: Large ICMP packets are lost
Product: libnetfilter_queue
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: libnetfilter_queue
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2014 May 19
6
[Bug 941] New: --queue-balance sending all traffic to queue 0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=941
Summary: --queue-balance sending all traffic to queue 0
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: nfnetlink_queue
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2012 Jan 14
0
iptable rule for bypassing netfilter queue for a matching address.
I have two iptable rules for userspace modification :
iptable -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 9090 -j NFQUEUE
iptable -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 9090 -j NFQUEUE
I have the following network setup:
client ---------------->Linux Box or router--------------------->server. What i'm trying to achieve is modifying all packets which comes from client to 9090 port of the
2017 Aug 02
1
Regarding KVM-Qemu Migration code
Respected Sir,
I need to modify kvm-qemu migration code. Please tell me where i can
find the code.
--
*Thank youWith Regards:Aditya Bhardwaj*
*Dept. of CSE *
*NITTTR (Ministry of MHRD, Govt. of India)*
*Sector-26, **Chandigarh - 160019 INDIA*
https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=rEHhEnEAAAAJ&hl=en
2020 Jul 08
3
[Bug 1440] New: kernel oops allowing a connection with nfq_set_verdict() on kernel 5.7.x with hardening parameters
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1440
Bug ID: 1440
Summary: kernel oops allowing a connection with
nfq_set_verdict() on kernel 5.7.x with hardening
parameters
Product: libnetfilter_queue
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
2011 Mar 07
2
[Bug 708] New: Some accepted packets get lost
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708
Summary: Some accepted packets get lost
Product: libnetfilter_queue
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libnetfilter_queue
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2012 Apr 25
1
forwarding packets to service in same host without using loopback network
This question is not about linux usage. But still i think user list
is a good crowd for linux programmer. So here it goes.
I have this libnetfilter_queue application which receives packets from
kernel based on some iptables rule. Before going straight to my
problem, i'm giving a sample workable code and other tools to set up a
test environment so that We problem definition and possible
2011 May 26
1
[ANNOUNCE]: Release of iptables-1.4.11
The netfilter coreteam presents:
iptables version 1.4.10
the iptables release for the 2.6.39 kernels. Due to some mistakes
on my side we didn't have a release for longer than expected, so
this contains a rather large number of changes.
Changes include:
- various bugfixes, cleanups and documentation updates
- a new "guided option parser" from Jan, replacing a lot of the
2016 May 30
0
[ANNOUNCE] libnftnl 1.0.6 release
Hi!
The Netfilter project proudly presents:
libnftnl 1.0.6
libnftnl is a userspace library providing a low-level netlink
programming interface (API) to the in-kernel nf_tables subsystem. The
library libnftnl has been previously known as libnftables. This
library is currently used by the nft command line tool.
This release includes the following list of updates:
* New TLV
2011 Oct 01
1
Fitting 3 beta distributions
Hi,
I want to fit 3 beta distributions to my data which ranges between 0 and 1.
What are the functions that I can easily call and specify that 3 beta
distributions should be fitted?
I have already looked at normalmixEM and fitdistr but they dont seem to be
applicable (normalmixEM is only for fitting normal dist and fitdistr will
only fit 1 distribution, not 3). Is that right?
Also, my data has 26