similar to: [Bug 971] New: Dropping anything with iptables and still can chat on IRC.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=916 Summary: Build failure on Slackware 14.1 (./configure rejects libreadline.so) Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at

Steve Frazier wrote: > Thank you.? I apologize for sending something that could be read.? There > are more examples in there that I had commented out. > Anyway,? here is my working iptables-save.? If someone could review my > output and let me know if I am missing anything and if the order of the > rules are the most secure they could be. > TIA. > Steve, Do you have any

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 Bug ID: 1324 Summary: with kernel 4.20.11 ip6table REDIRECT, process listening on redirected port does not get a packet Product: iptables Version: 1.6.x Hardware: All OS: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority:

Hello All, I don''t know about many on here, but I personally like to talk in Real Time format, when discussing things about wxRuby, therefore I''ve started the room #wxRuby on irc.freenode.net, since this is where the official Ruby-Lang chat room is. If your looking for help, or support, feel free to drop by. Also, keep in mind, of the following rules: 1.) Be nice to others,

Thank you.? I apologize for sending something that could be read.? There are more examples in there that I had commented out. Anyway,? here is my working iptables-save.? If someone could review my output and let me know if I am missing anything and if the order of the rules are the most secure they could be. TIA. Steve # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Fri Jun? 1 10:34:39

I assumed this was a Centos 7 mailing list and I was looking for help with IPTABLEs.I have used mailing lists before.? Copying a file to an email address didn't have that type of output.? I apologize. First of all is this a Centos 7 Mailing list that I can ask for help or have I made a huge mistake?? IF so, should I just attach the file to the email. I apologize for the output, I had no idea.?

On 4/7/20 11:54 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. > > I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: > > 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 > 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]:

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

Dear developer, This issue may be not related to openssh but I am not sure. So post it here for some luck. The issue is like this:(you can see more formatted description at (https://serverfault.com/questions/878504/can-only-ssh-unidirectional) I have two centos 7.2 server. One machine ip is 10.104.196.18, another machine is 10.240.197.21. I can successfully ssh from 10.104.196.18 to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191 Bug ID: 1191 Summary: Empty parameters generate errors on iptables-restore, even when saved by iptables-save Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hello, I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system. I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system all is working ? BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7 1511 on this systems fail2ban don't work anymore. I have this error or more, in the firewalld 2015-12-19 08:39:55 ERROR: COMMAND_FAILED: '/sbin/iptables -w2 -t filter -I

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=971 Summary: zfs key -l fails after unloading (keyscope=dataset) Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=944 Summary: Improvement of feedback of missing chain/target/match name Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043 Daniel Fraga <fragabr at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fraga <fragabr at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1076 Bug ID: 1076 Summary: trace target docs could be better Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at

In article <1612557.81lQ3GSSy2 at techz>, G?nther J. Niederwimmer <gjn at gjn.priv.at> wrote: > Hello, > > I have a big problem with fail2ban and firewalld on my new system. > > I have a server running (CentOS 7.1) and run a Update to 7.2 on this system > all is working ? > > BUT I install a new system with CentOS 7 1511 on this systems fail2ban don't

I have an old postfix server that was historically used by the campus as an outbound gateway. The campus is now supposed to use a different server running HAProxy with several backe-end postfix servers. I am using iptables on CentOS 7 to log and block smtp and submission traffic not coming from my front-end HAProxy server (with a few exceptions for testing and monitoring). What I would like to

Le 11/03/2018 ? 11:01, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit?: > So here's what I want to do, in plain words: > > 1. Redirect all HTTP traffic (port 80) to port 3128. So far so good. > > 2. Redirect all HTTPS traffic (port 443) to port 3129. Equally OK. > > AND... > > 3. DO NOT REDIRECT traffic that goes to certain domains, like: > > github.com >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985 Bug ID: 985 Summary: iptables-save cannot display devgroup rule the right way? Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables

Hello, I have first a question (and then may be a problem), that I have difficulties to understand and eventually to investigate. On each of my guests VM, I see constantly a RX dropped number increasing , Even if the VM does nothing ! ifconfig eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.100.15 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.100.255