similar to: [Bug 915] New: segfault in error case : expr_evaluate_payload not checking payload->payload.desc being null

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1092 Bug ID: 1092 Summary: nft v0.6 segfault in must_print_eq_op at expression.c:520 during 'nft monitor trace' in netdev filter Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW

I am getting unacceptable performace problems by using the roo gem for reading a file by using XLSX or XLS library from this gem. Someone may suggest me an alternative about how to parse an .XLSX file? <code> parsed_file = Excel.new(filename,false, :ignore) if (file_format.upcase == "XLS") parsed_file = Excelx.new(filename,false, :ignore) if (file_format.upcase ==

Hey, We hit a bug today because Arel::Visitors::ToSql is not threadsafe. Here is what is happening: Arel::Visitors::ENGINE_VISITORS is a cache of visitors instances. These instances are not inherently threadsafe because it contains state ''@last_column'', ''@connection'' that is shared between threads. The other variables ''@pool'',

Hello, everyone I wonder if R has something similar to Excel function EDATE(start_date; months) which returns a serial number of the date that is the indicated number of months before of after the start date. Example (the second column EDATE(first_column; -6)): 01.01.1999 01.07.1998 02.02.1999 02.08.1998 06.03.1999 06.09.1998 I am working with a zoo object where the row names are dates and for

On 10.03.2016 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 10/03/2016 8:27 AM, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> I can't seem to reliably obtain parse data via getParseData() for >> functions from installed packages. The parse data seems to be available >> only for the *last* file in the package. >> >> See [1] for a small example package with just two functions f and g in >>

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.9.4 This release contains fixes and new features available up to the Linux kernel 5.6 release. * Support for ranges in concatenations (requires Linux kernel >= 5.6), e.g. table ip foo { set whitelist { type ipv4_addr . ipv4_addr . inet_service flags interval

that seems to fix this kevent() problem, but I got the following lucene assert. Is that because of previous fails? Also, while I have your attention, is fts_autoindex supposed to work accross NAMESPACES? doveadm(mrm): Debug: Mailbox LISTS/vse-l: Opened mail UID=39483 because: fts indexing doveadm(mrm): Debug: Mailbox LISTS/vse-l: Opened mail UID=39484 because: fts indexing doveadm(mrm): Debug:

Add a new lexer token, unused in the grammar, for the unknown lines in index files; this should allow to better handle such kind of parsing errors, removing the need to exit() directly (and leave things in an unclean state). --- builder/index-parse.y | 1 + builder/index-scan.l | 5 +---- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/index-parse.y b/builder/index-parse.y

Very new to this but would appreciate a hand as this is driving me mad, I''m trying to update both degree and assigned from a single form, the degree section updates fine but assigned just retains the same values, any help much appreciated! my edit.rhtml file looks like: <h1>Editing degree</h1> <%= error_messages_for :degree %> <%= start_form_tag :action =>

Switch the lex/yacc parser into reentrant mode, to ease the handling of parsing-specific data; introduce a new parser_context struct for that, which is added as extra data to the parser. This should cause no behaviour changes in the parsing, just no more global variables used for getting data in/out the parser. --- builder/index-parse.y | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------

The netfilter project presents: nftables 0.2 This release contains a rather large number of bug fixes, syntax cleanups, new features, support for all new features contained in the recent 3.14 kernel release as well as *drumroll* documentation. Syntax changes ============== * More consistency in data type names Data type names are used in set declarations. All address related types now

Hi! We found some problems with those patches, and ended up doing slightly different fix: https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/3e41b3d%5E...cca98b.patch Aki On 24.10.2016 10:17, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Hi! > > Can you try these two patches? > > Aki > > > On 24.10.2016 08:48, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Ok so that timeval makes no sense. We'll look into it. >>