similar to: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Sharing MSIX irq for tx/rx queue pairs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[RFC PATCH 0/3] Sharing MSIX irq for tx/rx queue pairs"

2016 Nov 06
8
virtio_pci irq handling cleanups
Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper. All these are in preparation of taking advantage of the new PCI layer / core IRQ interrupt affinity handling, for which I will send out a series once this and some core interrupt handling changes are in.
2016 Nov 06
8
virtio_pci irq handling cleanups
Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper. All these are in preparation of taking advantage of the new PCI layer / core IRQ interrupt affinity handling, for which I will send out a series once this and some core interrupt handling changes are in.
2016 Nov 17
13
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio
Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper, and support for automatic affinity by the PCI layer if the consumers ask for it. It then converts over virtio_blk to use this functionality so that it's blk-mq queues are aligned to the MSI-X vector routing. I have a similar patch in the
2016 Nov 17
13
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio
Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper, and support for automatic affinity by the PCI layer if the consumers ask for it. It then converts over virtio_blk to use this functionality so that it's blk-mq queues are aligned to the MSI-X vector routing. I have a similar patch in the
2017 Feb 05
13
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V3
Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V2: - remove a redundant callback check - calculate ->msix_vectors
2017 Feb 05
13
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V3
Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V2: - remove a redundant callback check - calculate ->msix_vectors
2017 Jan 27
15
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V2
Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V1: - dropped the patches already merged for 4.10-rc - new patch to
2017 Jan 27
15
automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V2
Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V1: - dropped the patches already merged for 4.10-rc - new patch to
2017 Feb 07
2
[PATCH 1/9] virtio_pci: remove struct virtio_pci_vq_info
On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >
2017 Feb 07
2
[PATCH 1/9] virtio_pci: remove struct virtio_pci_vq_info
On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >
2014 Sep 01
3
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: share config interrupt between virtio devices
One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt for configuration between virtio devices. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
2014 Sep 01
3
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: share config interrupt between virtio devices
One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt for configuration between virtio devices. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range
2014 Sep 01
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: share config interrupt between virtio devices
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:37:30AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi Michael, > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:41:54PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt > > has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt Thanks for your quick reply. > normal == INT#x? Please don't call it normal. The proper name is >
2014 Sep 01
1
[PATCH RFC] virtio-pci: share config interrupt between virtio devices
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:37:30AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi Michael, > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 01:41:54PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt > > has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt Thanks for your quick reply. > normal == INT#x? Please don't call it normal. The proper name is >
2017 Mar 23
2
[REGRESSION] 07ec51480b5e ("virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues") causes crashes in guest
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:13:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >From 312859b596e83a2164a8430343d31fce2a5ad808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] virtio_pci: fix out of bound access for msix_names > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I tested this, and it
2017 Mar 23
2
[REGRESSION] 07ec51480b5e ("virtio_pci: use shared interrupts for virtqueues") causes crashes in guest
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:13:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >From 312859b596e83a2164a8430343d31fce2a5ad808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] virtio_pci: fix out of bound access for msix_names > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I tested this, and it