similar to: [PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio pci: virtio 1.0 support"

2015 Jan 14
22
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Changes since v2: handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng) reduce # of mappings for VQs These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch. There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups and enhancements. QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable. Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20? Also - will you be doing that
2015 Jan 14
22
[PATCH v3 00/16] virtio-pci: towards virtio 1.0 guest support
Changes since v2: handling for devices without config space (e.g. rng) reduce # of mappings for VQs These patches seem to work fine on my virtio-1.0 qemu branch. There haven't been any bugs since v2: just minor cleanups and enhancements. QEMU side is still undergoing polishing, but is already testable. Rusty, what do you think? Let's merge these for 3.20? Also - will you be doing that
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches. Coding style and funny jokes are his. Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine. Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work. TODO: = simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver. BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 11
6
[PATCH RFC 0/5] virtio_pci: modern driver
Based on Rusty's patches. Coding style and funny jokes are his. Bugs and a star wars reference (should be easy to spot) are mine. Untested, but useful as basis for beginning the qemu work. TODO: = simplify probing: use a common probe function, probe with modern driver first, if that fails - probe with legacy driver. BUGS: ATM legacy driver can win and drive a transitional device
2014 Dec 19
2
[PATCH RFC 2/5] s390: add pci_iomap_range
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the
2014 Dec 19
2
[PATCH RFC 2/5] s390: add pci_iomap_range
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > From: Michael S Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order, before squashing them. I also tweaked commit log for patch "virtio_pci: modern driver" I also included Gerd's tag: Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2015 Jan 21
14
[PATCH pre-squash 00/14] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just the full patchset reposted with fixups in correct order, before squashing them. I also tweaked commit log for patch "virtio_pci: modern driver" I also included Gerd's tag: Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones. I also tweaked commit log for patch "virtio_pci: modern driver" I also included Gerd's tag: Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jan 21
9
[PATCH post-squash 0/9] virtio 1.0: virtio-pci fixup
This is just repost of all patches with fixups squashed in - convenient if you just want to remove old ones from queue and apply new ones. I also tweaked commit log for patch "virtio_pci: modern driver" I also included Gerd's tag: Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> You can find it all before the rebase -i --autosquash in my tree:
2015 Jun 16
2
[PATCH] virtio-pci: alloc only resources actually used.
Move resource allocation from common code to legacy and modern code. Only request resources actually used, i.e. bar0 in legacy mode and the regions specified by capabilities in modern mode. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 7 ----- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 5 ++++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 13 +++++++++-
2015 Jun 16
2
[PATCH] virtio-pci: alloc only resources actually used.
Move resource allocation from common code to legacy and modern code. Only request resources actually used, i.e. bar0 in legacy mode and the regions specified by capabilities in modern mode. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 7 ----- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 5 ++++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 13 +++++++++-
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2015 Jun 18
2
[PATCH v2] virtio-pci: alloc only resources actually used.
Move resource allocation from common code to legacy and modern code. Only request resources actually used, i.e. bar0 in legacy mode and the regions specified by capabilities in modern mode. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 7 ---- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 5 +++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 13 +++++++-
2015 Jun 18
2
[PATCH v2] virtio-pci: alloc only resources actually used.
Move resource allocation from common code to legacy and modern code. Only request resources actually used, i.e. bar0 in legacy mode and the regions specified by capabilities in modern mode. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 7 ---- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.h | 5 +++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_legacy.c | 13 +++++++-
2015 Feb 11
2
[RFC 0/2] virtio_pci: patches never to apply.
This should allow testing when QEMU gets VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG support, but I'm pretty sure we should never allow these patches upstream. Tested with lguest (in virtio-next), which supports VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG. Rusty Russell (2): virtio_pci: abstract all MMIO accesses. virtio: Introducing virtio_pci.no_mmio, the worst boot option in history. drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c |
2015 Feb 11
2
[RFC 0/2] virtio_pci: patches never to apply.
This should allow testing when QEMU gets VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG support, but I'm pretty sure we should never allow these patches upstream. Tested with lguest (in virtio-next), which supports VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_PCI_CFG. Rusty Russell (2): virtio_pci: abstract all MMIO accesses. virtio: Introducing virtio_pci.no_mmio, the worst boot option in history. drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c |
2015 Jan 16
1
[PATCH v3 10/16] s390: add pci_iomap_range
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR > when this number reaches 0. >
2015 Jan 16
1
[PATCH v3 10/16] s390: add pci_iomap_range
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Virtio drivers should map the part of the range they need, not > necessarily all of it. > To this end, support mapping ranges within BAR on s390. > Since multiple ranges can now be mapped within a BAR, we keep track of > the number of mappings created, and only clear out the mapping for a BAR > when this number reaches 0. >