Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v8 02/50] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features"
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features
in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain,
and seems to become even more painful when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Based on patch by Rusty.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features
in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain,
and seems to become even more painful when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Based on patch by Rusty.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features
in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain,
and seems to become even more painful when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Based on patch by Rusty.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features
in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain,
and seems to become even more painful when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Based on patch by Rusty.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 25
0
[PATCH v4 01/42] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 25
0
[PATCH v4 01/42] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 07
0
[PATCH RFC 01/11] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 01/41] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 24
0
[PATCH v3 01/41] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 22
0
[PATCH RFC v2 03/16] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 22
0
[PATCH RFC v3 03/16] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 23
0
[PATCH RFC v4 03/17] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 22
0
[PATCH RFC v2 03/16] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 22
0
[PATCH RFC v3 03/16] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Oct 23
0
[PATCH RFC v4 03/17] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>
> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
> than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
>
> Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
2014 Nov 27
0
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
>
> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
> than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
>
> Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
2014 Nov 27
1
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:15:42PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
> >
> > It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more
> > than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now.
> >
> > Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com>
> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger