similar to: [PATCH v5 04/45] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v5 04/45] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports"

2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 05/46] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 05/50] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 05/46] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 05/50] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 05/46] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c | 3 +++
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 05/46] virtio: assert 32 bit features in transports
At this point, no transports set any of the high 32 feature bits. Since transports generally can't (yet) cope with such bits, add BUG_ON checks to make sure they are not set by mistake. Based on rproc patch by Rusty. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/lguest/lguest_device.c | 3 +++
2014 Nov 26
0
[PATCH v4 02/42] virtio: add support for 64 bit features.
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:41:22 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > > Change the u32 to a u64, and make sure to use 1ULL everywhere! > > Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > [Thomas Huth: fix up virtio-ccw
2014 Nov 25
0
[PATCH v4 01/42] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 25
0
[PATCH v4 01/42] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 02/50] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 30
0
[PATCH v7 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Dec 01
0
[PATCH v8 02/50] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v6 02/46] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for features
It seemed like a good idea to use bitmap for features in struct virtio_device, but it's actually a pain, and seems to become even more painful when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Based on patch by Rusty. Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 27
2
[PATCH v5 01/45] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> It seemed like a good idea, but it's actually a pain when we get more than 32 feature bits. Just change it to a u32 for now. Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
2014 Nov 25
2
[PATCH v4 02/42] virtio: add support for 64 bit features.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Change the u32 to a u64, and make sure to use 1ULL everywhere! Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> [Thomas Huth: fix up virtio-ccw get_features] Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>
2014 Nov 25
2
[PATCH v4 02/42] virtio: add support for 64 bit features.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Change the u32 to a u64, and make sure to use 1ULL everywhere! Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> [Thomas Huth: fix up virtio-ccw get_features] Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>
2014 Oct 07
0
[PATCH RFC 02/11] virtio: add support for 64 bit features.
From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Change the u32 to a u64, and make sure to use 1ULL everywhere! Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland at google.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> [Thomas Huth: fix up virtio-ccw get_features] Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com>