similar to: [PATCH] virtio: unify config_changed handling

Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in virtio.c. The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE, now we return IRQ_HANDLED. As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal. See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934 virtio-pci: do not

Replace duplicated code in all transports with a single wrapper in virtio.c. The only functional change is in virtio_mmio.c: if a buggy device sends us an interrupt before driver is set, we previously returned IRQ_NONE, now we return IRQ_HANDLED. As this must not happen in practice, this does not look like a big deal. See also commit 3fff0179e33cd7d0a688dab65700c46ad089e934 virtio-pci: do not

Rusty, I have a mind to include this patchset for this merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to include this patchset for this merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to send this patches for the next merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to send this patches for the next merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a clear violation of virtio

Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a clear violation of virtio

Changes from v4: rename virtio_enable_vqs_early() to virtio_device_ready() Note: Rusty requested we add a BUG_ON in the virtio_ring code. This can be done by a separate patch on top. Good for bisectability in case BUG_ON starts triggering :) Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device

Changes from v4: rename virtio_enable_vqs_early() to virtio_device_ready() Note: Rusty requested we add a BUG_ON in the virtio_ring code. This can be done by a separate patch on top. Good for bisectability in case BUG_ON starts triggering :) Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device

On 2014/11/6 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:35:12PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, >> so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd >> are not supported. And the net performance is not >> the best without vhost-net and irqfd supporting. >> >> This patch support

On 2014/11/6 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:35:12PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, >> so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd >> are not supported. And the net performance is not >> the best without vhost-net and irqfd supporting. >> >> This patch support

As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd are not supported. And the net performance is not the best without vhost-net and irqfd supporting. This patch support virtio-mmio to request multiple irqs like virtio-pci. With this patch and qemu assigning multiple irqs for virtio-mmio device, it's ok to use vhost-net with irqfd on

As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd are not supported. And the net performance is not the best without vhost-net and irqfd supporting. This patch support virtio-mmio to request multiple irqs like virtio-pci. With this patch and qemu assigning multiple irqs for virtio-mmio device, it's ok to use vhost-net with irqfd on

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:35:12PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, > so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd > are not supported. And the net performance is not > the best without vhost-net and irqfd supporting. > > This patch support virtio-mmio to request multiple > irqs like virtio-pci. With this patch and

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:54:54PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > On 2014/11/6 17:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:35:12PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > >> As the current virtio-mmio only support single irq, > >> so some advanced features such as vhost-net with irqfd > >> are not supported. And the net performance is not > >>

On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:07:05 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Defer config changed notifications that arrive during > probe/scan/freeze/restore. > > This will allow drivers to set DRIVER_OK earlier, without worrying about > racing with config change interrupts. > > This change will also benefit old hypervisors (before 2009) > that

On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:07:05 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Defer config changed notifications that arrive during > probe/scan/freeze/restore. > > This will allow drivers to set DRIVER_OK earlier, without worrying about > racing with config change interrupts. > > This change will also benefit old hypervisors (before 2009) > that

From: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> This irq handler will get the interrupt reason from a shared memory. And will be assigned only while irqfd enabled. Signed-off-by: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c

From: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> This irq handler will get the interrupt reason from a shared memory. And will be assigned only while irqfd enabled. Signed-off-by: Li Liu <john.liuli at huawei.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c