similar to: [PATCH v3 0/2] virtio-rng: fix hotunplug

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

I received two mails about faile to apply patches to 3.16-stable tree: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: skip reading when we start to remove the device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree FAILED: patch "[PATCH] virtio-rng: fix stuck of hot-unplugging busy device" failed to apply to 3.16-stable tree Amit already backported two patches for 3.16-stable, then cherry-pick of my

On (Wed) 06 Aug 2014 [16:05:41], Amos Kong wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:35:15AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, > > the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at > > wait_for_completion_killable(). > > > > This patch fixed the hang by completing have_data completion

On (Wed) 06 Aug 2014 [16:05:41], Amos Kong wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:35:15AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote: > > When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, > > the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at > > wait_for_completion_killable(). > > > > This patch fixed the hang by completing have_data completion

When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at wait_for_completion_killable(). This patch fixed the hang by completing have_data completion before unregistering a virtio-rng device. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org ---

When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at wait_for_completion_killable(). This patch fixed the hang by completing have_data completion before unregistering a virtio-rng device. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org ---

Current hwrng core supports to register multiple hwrng devices, and there is only one device really works in the same time. QEMU alsu supports to have multiple virtio-rng backends. This patch changes virtio-rng driver to support multiple virtio-rng devices. ]# cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_available virtio_rng.0 virtio_rng.1 ]# cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_current virtio_rng.0 ]# echo

Current hwrng core supports to register multiple hwrng devices, and there is only one device really works in the same time. QEMU alsu supports to have multiple virtio-rng backends. This patch changes virtio-rng driver to support multiple virtio-rng devices. ]# cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_available virtio_rng.0 virtio_rng.1 ]# cat /sys/class/misc/hw_random/rng_current virtio_rng.0 ]# echo

A bit late to a party, but: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > > There's currently a big lock around everything, and it means that we > can't query sysfs (eg /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current) > while the rng is reading. This is a real problem when the rng is

A bit late to a party, but: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> > > There's currently a big lock around everything, and it means that we > can't query sysfs (eg /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current) > while the rng is reading. This is a real problem when the rng is

v2: - update patch 3 to store the hwrng_register_done bool per-device rather than global - add patch 2 that re-arranges struct elems for better packing. Hi, This series enables virtio-rng to service the early randomness requests made by the hwrng core (patch 3), with Herbert's idea of using the scan routine. Patch 4 reverts the previous restriction, which no longer applies, to not send

v2: - update patch 3 to store the hwrng_register_done bool per-device rather than global - add patch 2 that re-arranges struct elems for better packing. Hi, This series enables virtio-rng to service the early randomness requests made by the hwrng core (patch 3), with Herbert's idea of using the scan routine. Patch 4 reverts the previous restriction, which no longer applies, to not send

When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at wait_for_completion_killable(). This patch exits the waiting by completing have_data completion before unregistering, resets data_avail to avoid the hwrng core use wrong buffer bytes. Before real unregistering we should return -ENODEV for reading. When we

When we try to hot-remove a busy virtio-rng device from QEMU monitor, the device can't be hot-removed. Because virtio-rng driver hangs at wait_for_completion_killable(). This patch exits the waiting by completing have_data completion before unregistering, resets data_avail to avoid the hwrng core use wrong buffer bytes. Before real unregistering we should return -ENODEV for reading. When we

Hi, This series enables virtio-rng to service the early randomness requests made by the hwrng core (patch 2), with Herbert's idea of using the scan routine. Patch 3 reverts the previous restriction, which no longer applies, to not send read requests to the host before successful probe. Patch 1 is a minor cleanup. Please review and apply, Amit Shah (3): virtio: rng: remove unused struct

Hi, This series enables virtio-rng to service the early randomness requests made by the hwrng core (patch 2), with Herbert's idea of using the scan routine. Patch 3 reverts the previous restriction, which no longer applies, to not send read requests to the host before successful probe. Patch 1 is a minor cleanup. Please review and apply, Amit Shah (3): virtio: rng: remove unused struct

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:15:51PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request. > > This will also enable us to remove the workaround

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:15:51PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request. > > This will also enable us to remove the workaround