similar to: [PATCH v4 0/4] virtio: Clean up scatterlists and use the DMA API

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This fixes virtio on Xen guests as well as on any other platform that uses virtio_pci on which physical addresses don't match bus addresses. This can be tested with: virtme-run --xen xen --kimg arch/x86/boot/bzImage --console using virtme from here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/kernel/virtme/virtme.git Without these patches, the guest hangs forever. With these patches,

This switches virtio to use the DMA API unconditionally. I'm sure it breaks things, but it seems to work on x86 using virtio-pci, with and without Xen, and using both the modern 1.0 variant and the legacy variant. Changes from v2: - Fix really embarrassing bug. This version actually works. Changes from v1: - Fix an endian conversion error causing a BUG to hit. - Fix a DMA ordering issue

This switches virtio to use the DMA API unconditionally. I'm sure it breaks things, but it seems to work on x86 using virtio-pci, with and without Xen, and using both the modern 1.0 variant and the legacy variant. Changes from v2: - Fix really embarrassing bug. This version actually works. Changes from v1: - Fix an endian conversion error causing a BUG to hit. - Fix a DMA ordering issue

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

On 26/08/14 23:17, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't > always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and > it is likely to fail if a physical "virtio" device ever ends

On 26/08/14 23:17, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't > always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and > it is likely to fail if a physical "virtio" device ever ends

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

## About DMA APIs Now, virtio may can not work with DMA APIs when virtio features do not have VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM. 1. I tried to let DMA APIs return phy address by virtio-device. But DMA APIs just work with the "real" devices. 2. I tried to let xsk support callballs to get phy address from virtio-net driver as the dma address. But the maintainers of xsk may want to use

## About DMA APIs Now, virtio may can not work with DMA APIs when virtio features do not have VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM. 1. I tried to let DMA APIs return phy address by virtio-device. But DMA APIs just work with the "real" devices. 2. I tried to let xsk support callballs to get phy address from virtio-net driver as the dma address. But the maintainers of xsk may want to use

XDP socket(AF_XDP) is an excellent bypass kernel network framework. The zero copy feature of xsk (XDP socket) needs to be supported by the driver. The performance of zero copy is very good. ENV: Qemu with vhost. vhost cpu | Guest APP CPU |Guest Softirq CPU | PPS -----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------------ xmit by sockperf: 90% | 100%

XDP socket(AF_XDP) is an excellent bypass kernel network framework. The zero copy feature of xsk (XDP socket) needs to be supported by the driver. The performance of zero copy is very good. ENV: Qemu with vhost. vhost cpu | Guest APP CPU |Guest Softirq CPU | PPS -----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------------ xmit by sockperf: 90% | 100%

XDP socket(AF_XDP) is an excellent bypass kernel network framework. The zero copy feature of xsk (XDP socket) needs to be supported by the driver. The performance of zero copy is very good. ENV: Qemu with vhost. vhost cpu | Guest APP CPU |Guest Softirq CPU | PPS -----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------------ xmit by sockperf: 90% | 100%

XDP socket(AF_XDP) is an excellent bypass kernel network framework. The zero copy feature of xsk (XDP socket) needs to be supported by the driver. The performance of zero copy is very good. ENV: Qemu with vhost. vhost cpu | Guest APP CPU |Guest Softirq CPU | PPS -----------------------------|---------------|------------------|------------ xmit by sockperf: 90% | 100%