similar to: iptables patch-o-matic

I have a system with Fedora installed on the partition with label "/". Can I install CentOS on a new empty partition (/dev/cciss/c0d3p1), or do I need to remove the "/" label on the Fedora partition and change Fedora's fstab to mount by physical partition? I'd like to keep Fedora as a fall-back OS until I have CentOS completely up and working. My Fedora fstab:

Hello all, I am implementing a new mail server into our environment consisting of three machines - two Dell Opterons that will act as load balanced Postfix servers, and a 1.5TB RAID10 NFS server. All three machines are running CentOS 4.5. Since the NFS is going to be used for only mail, I was kicking around the idea to use XFS. I have CentOS installed on an ext3 partition, and with the

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Rajeev R Veedu wrote: > I have a Cyrus installation with postfix and openXchange. I get the mails > from catchall account with procmail and distribute with the mail server. Now > I have a new site office where couples of staff members are going to be > relocated. > > Since we have only an ADSL line on site office if there

The recent thread on Anaconda and RAID10 made me start to think about how to partition a server I'm about to set up. I have two 146GB SCSI drives on an IBM x3550. It will be used as a build system. As such, there is no critical data on these systems, as the source code will be checked out of our source control system, and the build results are copied to another system. I usually

Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... -- Best Wishes Sorin --------------------------------------------- http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ Proud member of TEAM OS/2. Mountainbiker [Kona Kilauea - Member of Equipe Les Cafards VTT] Motorcyclist [Honda VFR750F-'97]

Hi, I just installed CentOS 4.4 x86_64 on our new 2 x Dual Core Opteron Server. First the system was unstable, but I after turning of Power-now it runs stable (anyone else experienced this?). However the following line in dmesg puzzles me: tg3: eth0: No interrupt was generated using MSI, switching to INTx mode. Please report this failure to the PCI maintainer and include system chipset

Hi all, I haven''t been paying attention to this for a while, but now that I download the latest patch-o-matic-ng, I see that most of the patches are gone... Anybody have an idea where I can download the ''extras'' repository? Specifically geoip. Thanks! -justin

Stian B. Barmen schrieb: > I try to use patch-o-matic-ng for installation. Kernel patching works > nicely but the libipt_ipp2p.so shared object does not get built. I find > the .c file in the patch-o-matic tree under ipp2p but I don''t know how > to manually compile it. > My lsmod includes the sucsessfully made ipt_ipp2p module and I also > recompiled iptables for

--KMIs29sPfC/9Gbii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030107 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-08 13:06 ------- what compiler are you

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 ------- Additional Comments From arnt@c2i.net 2003-02-08 18:09 ------- ..sorry, this is crucial info; compilers: RH-7.3: [root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]# rpm -q gcc gcc-2.96-113 [root@gw linux-2.4.18-24.7.x]# ...and ditto for RH-8.0: [root@fw linux-2.4.18-24.8.0]# rpm -q gcc gcc-3.2-7

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|blocker |trivial ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:27 ------- #include

Hello, Is there is iptables and kernel package support for patch-o-matic? System: Centos 4.3 Thank you. Rgds, Asfihani

The rsync faq-o-matic was broken during the recent machine migration. Since there was relatively little useful content and a lot of unanswered or pointless questions, I am going to remove the links to it. If anyone feels like maintaining an FAQ please do so. -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

--BU7+kJFeeDlNltZg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good news, Everyone! (TM) The netfilter core team announces a new release of the netfilter patch-o-matic suite: patch-o-matic-20030912 This release contains the most up-to-date bugfixes and new features for=20 the netfilter/iptables subsystem of the 2.4.x Linux

Hi, i have used shorewall for several years now, but now i have a problem i can not solve by my own. I use Debian (Testing/Sarge) with shorewall 2.2 and 2.6.10 Kernel. In the next few weeks i need several IPSEC VPN tunnels - ans thats the problem. "shorewall check" tells me that "Policy Match: not available". As i have RTFMd i need some iptables ans netfilter patches for 2.6

Hi, I work in Dell Support and I have a customer with a PowerEdge 1650 Server with Intel? PRO/1000 XT (82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controllers). The nic is integrated on the motherboard. The customer is using a Linux system with DHCP+tftp to PXE boot and load an MS-Dos 6.22 image, with an UNDI driver, over to the PowerEdge 1650 and then map a Samba share to install Windows 2000. The customer get

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Summary: ..patch-o-matic: nfnetlink_conntrack.c or -.h ... compile failure: Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component:

Good day, I have a centos 4.4 box (all yumed up). Now i have a program that has a sub shell - meaning something like the mysql command line, where once started it takes it's own commands, etc and keeps running until a "quit" command is issued. Now what I was wondering - is there a way to fork it to the background (something like # command & or ctrl -z) and have the subshell keep

Hello I have an OS installation and data on a 40 gb drive that I would like to image to a 80 gb drive. I don't care if the resulting partition layout on the new drive is only 40 gb making me lose space. I just want to move everything from the older drive because I think it's failing. I have looked at partimage and mondo rescue as imaging solutions but both deal with partitions. CAn someone