similar to: [PULL] virtio-next

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

Hey Greg, Can you add these two patches to the 3.16 queue? Thanks, On (Tue) 12 Aug 2014 [13:23:45], Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request.

Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read from them. This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no init fn pointer being registered by the device. If an init function is registered, this call is made after

Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read from them. This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no init fn pointer being registered by the device. If an init function is registered, this call is made after

Some RNG devices may not be ready to give early randomness at probe() time, and hence lose out on the opportunity to contribute to system randomness at boot- or device hotplug- time. This commit schedules a delayed work item for such devices, and fetches early randomness after a delay. Currently the delay is 500ms, which is enough for the lone device that needs such treatment: virtio-rng. CC:

Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, we're ready to service that request. This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the

On (Wed) 02 Jul 2014 [09:41:56], Jason Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:56:35PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > > > On (Wed) 02 Jul 2014 [13:00:19], Jason Cooper wrote: > > > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" > > > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. > >

Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read from them. Also, the virtio-rng device does not behave properly when this call is made in its probe() routine - the virtio core sets the DRIVER_OK status bit only on a successful

current_rng holds one reference, and we bump it every time we want to do a read from it. This means we only hold the rng_mutex to grab or drop a reference, so accessing /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current doesn't block on read of /dev/hwrng. Using a kref is overkill (we're always under the rng_mutex), but a standard pattern. This also solves the problem that the hwrng_fillfn

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> wrote: > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read > from them. > > This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> wrote: > Commit d9e7972619334 "hwrng: add randomness to system from rng sources" > added a call to rng_get_data() from the hwrng_register() function. > However, some rng devices need initialization before data can be read > from them. > > This commit makes the call to rng_get_data() depend on no

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> current_rng holds one reference, and we bump it every time we want to do a read from it. This means we only hold the rng_mutex to grab or drop a reference, so accessing /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current doesn't block on read of /dev/hwrng. Using a kref is overkill (we're always under the rng_mutex), but a standard

Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> writes: > We got a warning in boot stage when above set_current_rng() is executed, > it can be fixed by init rng->ref in hwrng_init(). > > > @@ -166,6 +169,8 @@ static inline int hwrng_init(struct hwrng *rng) > if (current_quality > 0 && !hwrng_fill) > start_khwrngd(); > > +

Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> writes: > We got a warning in boot stage when above set_current_rng() is executed, > it can be fixed by init rng->ref in hwrng_init(). > > > @@ -166,6 +169,8 @@ static inline int hwrng_init(struct hwrng *rng) > if (current_quality > 0 && !hwrng_fill) > start_khwrngd(); > > +

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:15:51PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request. > > This will also enable us to remove the workaround

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:15:51PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the > scan routine. This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful, > and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init, > we're ready to service that request. > > This will also enable us to remove the workaround