similar to: [PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs"

2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent. drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent. drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2016 Jun 22
4
[PATCH 0/3] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 Jun 22
4
[PATCH 0/3] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 Mar 25
4
[RFC PATCH V2 0/2] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of iommu for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - Fill the translation request in a preset userspace address (This
2016 Mar 25
4
[RFC PATCH V2 0/2] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace(qemu) implementation of iommu for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - Fill the translation request in a preset userspace address (This
2016 Jun 23
3
[PATCH V2 0/3] basic device IOTLB support for vhost_net
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 Jun 23
3
[PATCH V2 0/3] basic device IOTLB support for vhost_net
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 May 24
6
[RFC PATCH V3 0/3] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 May 24
6
[RFC PATCH V3 0/3] basic device IOTLB support
This patch tries to implement an device IOTLB for vhost. This could be used with for co-operation with userspace IOMMU implementation (qemu) for a secure DMA environment (DMAR) in guest. The idea is simple. When vhost meets an IOTLB miss, it will request the assistance of userspace to do the translation, this is done through: - when there's a IOTLB miss, it will notify userspace through
2016 Jan 19
0
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:42:29 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range
2016 Mar 25
0
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect >
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect >
2009 Nov 02
1
[PATCHv6 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
What it is: vhost net is a character device that can be used to reduce the number of system calls involved in virtio networking. Existing virtio net code is used in the guest without modification. There's similarity with vringfd, with some differences and reduced scope - uses eventfd for signalling - structures can be moved around in memory at any time (good for migration, bug work-arounds
2009 Nov 02
1
[PATCHv6 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
What it is: vhost net is a character device that can be used to reduce the number of system calls involved in virtio networking. Existing virtio net code is used in the guest without modification. There's similarity with vringfd, with some differences and reduced scope - uses eventfd for signalling - structures can be moved around in memory at any time (good for migration, bug work-arounds
2009 Dec 24
1
[PATCH] vhost: access check thinko fixes
This fixes two issues with recent access checking patch: 1. if (&d->vqs[i].private_data) -> if (d->vqs[i].private_data) 2. we can't forbid log base changes while ring is running, because host needs to resize log in rare cases (e.g. when memory is added with a baloon) and in that case it needs to increase log size with realloc, which might move the log address.
2009 Dec 24
1
[PATCH] vhost: access check thinko fixes
This fixes two issues with recent access checking patch: 1. if (&d->vqs[i].private_data) -> if (d->vqs[i].private_data) 2. we can't forbid log base changes while ring is running, because host needs to resize log in rare cases (e.g. when memory is added with a baloon) and in that case it needs to increase log size with realloc, which might move the log address.