similar to: question about "struct kvm_segment"

Il 20/05/2014 04:25, Jidong Xiao ha scritto: > Hi, > > The structure kvm_segment is defined as follows: > > struct kvm_segment { > __u64 base; > __u32 limit; > __u16 selector; > __u8 type; > __u8 present, dpl, db, s, l, g, avl; > __u8 unusable; > __u8 padding; > }; > > Since the VMX spec

Hi, I want to migrate from vmware to KVM. Therefore I have installed debian stable (lenny) and create two virtual machines (KVM). Both (XP as well as Vista) running fine. After upgrading to debian testing (sqeeze) both XP-guest as well as Vista-guest didn't start anymore. Both are failing during preparation, probably because of a network-problem. I will give XP as an example: cat

Hi all, I'm Initializing the Local and IO APIC for a propeitary operating system running in Virtualized Environment . Im facing some problem with qemu-kvm but the code runs fine with qemu. when i run my kernel image with qemu-kvm it gives emulation error failure trying to execute the code outside ROM or RAM at fec00000(IO APIC base address) but the same code runs fine with qemu. can

Hi all, I'm Initializing the Local and IO APIC for a propeitary operating system running in Virtualized Environment . Im facing some problem with qemu-kvm but the code runs fine with qemu. when i run my kernel image with qemu-kvm it gives emulation error failure trying to execute the code outside ROM or RAM at fec00000(IO APIC base address) but the same code runs fine with qemu. can

From: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> This function will be used to test if a MSR access is already tracked. Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com> Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 3

I'd love to get a legacy application running under wine (yeah wouldn't we all I hear ya) and I'm up to a point were it's complaining about a missing DLL as per the subject. I can get the missing file from a Windows installation but no matter where I place it (in the applications directory, in the fake_windows/Windows/System directory it doesn't find it. I have edited the

Hi - Updated my old project named "ext3carve" and renamed it as "extcarve" . It uses libext2fs. (To be precise,re-uses on 'debugfs' command's "dump_unused" feature) In summary,the tool will do the following - It will scan the linux machine ,for unused/deleted blocks and search for magic signatures. If it finds valid signature (both header and footer) It

Descriptor and trap table cleanups. Add cleanly written accessors for IDT and GDT gates so the subarch may override them. Note that this allows the hypervisor to transparently tweak the DPL of the descriptors as well as the RPL of segments in those descriptors, with no unnecessary kernel code modification. It also allows the hypervisor implementation of the VMI to tweak the gates, allowing for

Descriptor and trap table cleanups. Add cleanly written accessors for IDT and GDT gates so the subarch may override them. Note that this allows the hypervisor to transparently tweak the DPL of the descriptors as well as the RPL of segments in those descriptors, with no unnecessary kernel code modification. It also allows the hypervisor implementation of the VMI to tweak the gates, allowing for

pxelinux.0 from the fsc branch (syslinux-3.84-pre6-262-g03d6454) doesn't seem to work. Qemu exists with: qemu: fatal: Trying to execute code outside RAM or ROM at 0x6c620065 EAX=00103b88 EBX=00007ba2 ECX=00000000 EDX=0010399a ESI=00103590 EDI=f81b0000 EBP=00000000 ESP=0011ffe8 EIP=6c620065 EFL=00000202 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0 ES =0028 00000000 ffffffff 00cf9300 DPL=0 DS

Has anyone seen this before? These phones are behind an edgewater. SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 0.0.0.0:5060;branch=z9hG4bKaf87f1c9f;received=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. From: 7408 <sip:5D03C49B-7408@dpl.voip.rockynet.com>;tag=23943befc9dc103 To: 7408 <sip:5D03C49B-7408@dpl.voip.rockynet.com>;tag=as2c0b7dcd Call-ID: 723559d029d27c820c8dae4b01e45c77@192.168.50.31 This phone is

Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.

Hi, this is a series of patches that unify the struct desc_struct and friends across x86_64 and i386. As usual, it provides paravirt capabilities as a side-effect for x86_64. I consider the main goal, namely, of unifying the desc_struct, an ongoing effort, being this the beginning. A lot of old code has to be touched to accomplish that. I don't consider this patch ready for inclusion.

I'm just dumping all I got in here, after initial feedback we can see how to organize todo's around it. tl;dr: * Does not upgrade cleanly from 4.8 packages, so we have to prevent this from entering testing until we fix that. * Live migration is broken, explodes with memory allocation errors. ---- >8 ---- 1. Build packages * I have built salsa/master using pbuilder targeting sid.

Hello after upgrading to 9.2-release i can see periodical page faults. advises welcome. examples: 1. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 5; apic id = 22 fault virtual address = 0x18 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8051095c stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff88a9d77800 frame pointer =

I'm looking for a package that has a start-of-the-art method of imputation of missing values in a data frame with both continuous and factor columns. I've found transcan() in 'Hmisc', which appears to be possibly suited to my needs, but I haven't been able to figure out how to get a new data frame with the imputed values replaced (I don't have Herrell's book). Any

On 2/5/19 1:27 AM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > > On 1/31/19 4:57 PM, Bruce Hoult wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:05 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Do such architectures frequently have arithmetic operations on the >>> mask registers?  (i.e. can I reasonable compute a conservative >>> length

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040715/b3253d77/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- ? Hi, I have some queries: I am using speex in Windows platform. 1. I am having some problem with the speex,for input 8KHz,8bits/sample mono stream i am getting output as 8KHz, 16bits/sample mono stream. I would like to know

Hi, I couldn't find anything about this subject from archive - are there known problems with compiling libshout2 under FreeBSD 5.1 or 4.8 (both are up to date). I downloaded libshout2 latest nightly snapshot and tried to compile it on 5.0 and then later on 4.8. Both failed (problems were mostly around sock.c, sock.h, resolver.c - redeclaring and syntax errors). Thinking that it might be a

Are there any packages in R that reproduce the package "resample" of S-Plus? The sample() function in R doesn't provide equivalent flexibility of bootstrap() and bootstrap2(). ================================================================ Robert A. LaBudde, PhD, PAS, Dpl. ACAFS e-mail: ral at lcfltd.com Least Cost Formulations, Ltd. URL: http://lcfltd.com/ 824