similar to: [PATCH] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()"

2014 Feb 21
2
[PATCH] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()
Hi Rusty et al, Based on recently accepted to the mainline pci_enable_msix_exact() function, I am sending a updated version of the patch. Please, let me know if it does not work for you and you need and incremental update from the previous version. Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev at redhat.com
2014 Feb 21
2
[PATCH] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()
Hi Rusty et al, Based on recently accepted to the mainline pci_enable_msix_exact() function, I am sending a updated version of the patch. Please, let me know if it does not work for you and you need and incremental update from the previous version. Thanks! -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev at redhat.com
2014 Feb 22
1
[PATCH v2] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable_msix()
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions > pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers > using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the > new pci_enable_msi_range() or pci_enable_msi_exact() > and pci_enable_msix_range() or pci_enable_msix_exact() > interfaces.
2014 Feb 22
1
[PATCH v2] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable_msix()
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions > pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers > using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the > new pci_enable_msi_range() or pci_enable_msi_exact() > and pci_enable_msix_range() or pci_enable_msix_exact() > interfaces.
2014 Feb 20
0
[PATCH] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_range() instead of pci_enable_msix()
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev at redhat.com> writes: > As result deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions > pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers > using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the > new pci_enable_msi_range() and pci_enable_msix_range() > interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev at redhat.com> >
2014 Feb 21
0
[PATCH v2] virtio: Use pci_enable_msix_exact() instead of pci_enable_msix()
As result of deprecation of MSI-X/MSI enablement functions pci_enable_msix() and pci_enable_msi_block() all drivers using these two interfaces need to be updated to use the new pci_enable_msi_range() or pci_enable_msi_exact() and pci_enable_msix_range() or pci_enable_msix_exact() interfaces. Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev at redhat.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at
2009 Jul 26
1
[PATCHv4 2/2] virtio: refactor find_vqs
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing two regressions from 2.6.30: - double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal - probe failure when vq can't be assigned to msi-x vector (reported on old host kernels) An older version of this patch was tested by Amit Shah. Reported-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
2009 Jul 26
1
[PATCHv4 2/2] virtio: refactor find_vqs
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing two regressions from 2.6.30: - double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal - probe failure when vq can't be assigned to msi-x vector (reported on old host kernels) An older version of this patch was tested by Amit Shah. Reported-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
2011 Apr 20
1
[PATCH] driver, virtio: Modify the err hanlding logic
From: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly at taobao.com> In the function vp_request_msix_vectors(), when pci_enable_msix() returns 0, there will be redundant double checks for 'err'. This patch fixes it to avoid the unnecessary check. Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly at taobao.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 ++++--- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git
2011 Apr 20
1
[PATCH] driver, virtio: Modify the err hanlding logic
From: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly at taobao.com> In the function vp_request_msix_vectors(), when pci_enable_msix() returns 0, there will be redundant double checks for 'err'. This patch fixes it to avoid the unnecessary check. Signed-off-by: Liu Yuan <tailai.ly at taobao.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 7 ++++--- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git
2010 Mar 25
2
[PATCH v3 1/1] Shared memory uio_pci driver
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:09:36AM -0600, Cam Macdonell wrote: > This patch adds a driver for my shared memory PCI device using the uio_pci > interface. The driver has three memory regions. The first memory region is for > device registers for sending interrupts. The second BAR is for receiving MSI-X > interrupts and the third memory region maps the shared memory. The device only
2010 Mar 25
2
[PATCH v3 1/1] Shared memory uio_pci driver
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:09:36AM -0600, Cam Macdonell wrote: > This patch adds a driver for my shared memory PCI device using the uio_pci > interface. The driver has three memory regions. The first memory region is for > device registers for sending interrupts. The second BAR is for receiving MSI-X > interrupts and the third memory region maps the shared memory. The device only
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2011 Dec 08
14
[PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.
2007 Aug 13
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1049 - in trunk: . drivers
Alexander Gordeev wrote: > Author: agordeev-guest > Date: Mon Aug 13 13:09:43 2007 > New Revision: 1049 > > Log: > drivers/megatec_usb.c: added credits to the banner message. Is this really needed/desirable? I think this kind of information needs to be put in the AUTHORS document. There are many more people on this list that put a lot of effort in NUT, without claiming credit
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range
2013 Mar 21
24
[PATCH 00/22] New virtio PCI layout
I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range
2007 Feb 08
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r801 - in branches/megatec-usb: . drivers
Hi Alexander, thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few more (cosmetic) changes. Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly? In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and merge the driver to the main branch. There is still the
2014 Jul 26
20
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
Hi all, The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested it, sorry for the noise. The series is based on Linux-3.16-rc1. MSI was introduced in PCI Spec 2.2. Currently, kernel MSI driver codes are bonding with PCI device. Because MSI has a lot advantages in design. More and more non-PCI devices want to use
2014 Jul 26
20
[RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
Hi all, The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested it, sorry for the noise. The series is based on Linux-3.16-rc1. MSI was introduced in PCI Spec 2.2. Currently, kernel MSI driver codes are bonding with PCI device. Because MSI has a lot advantages in design. More and more non-PCI devices want to use