similar to: DMARC test (request)

>> Well I consider the search >> filter by subject is a much better approach, >> for participating on a conversation. > > The Subject is not enough when you have several emails with > the same > Subject entry, specially one right after the other. We are > talking > about a Mailing List, and this situation is not uncommon. > I do follow topics; no

> As per > prior discussions, the "From:" field should remain > with the > original sender. One (important) > reason is that frequent participants > in the > Syslinux Mailing List tend to use the "From:" > field, for > instance as search filter. Well I consider the search filter by subject is a much better approach, for participating on a

> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi Gene: > > Everything that comes from the list goes to my spam folder > > because the message looks as spam to yahoo. > > A simple filter resolves this: > > Deliver to "Inbox" if > To/CC contains "syslinux at zytor.com" > > > why is

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >> As per >> prior discussions, the "From:" field should remain >> with the >> original sender. One (important) >> reason is that frequent participants >> in the >> Syslinux Mailing List tend to use the "From:" >> field, for >> instance

On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that impersonates

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing

On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: > On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > >> >> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, > > > A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it > needs to look for specific list type

On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Juri Haberland via dovecot: > >> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences >> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving >> participants. > > Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, > the issue was not on the

> > > > > > Let's see what happens. > > > > > > > Perhaps this time? > > I did miss the reason why a new test would be usefull. > Perhaps are people behind the curtains too shy :-) > > The test did NOT show any improvement. > > > In the webinterface of mailman, that is where I access privileges, > is now

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >?????????? <snip/> > > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > > but ignores

>I wonder (please forgive my ignorance), whether there would be any >change/improvement if the "Reply-To:" and "CC:" fields would be >interchanged (back) from the current behavior (since March 2014 or so, >http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-March/021895.html ). Perhaps >Hotmail (and family) would accept these (Yahoo-originated) messages >then? AFAIK if the

Hi there. Anybody knows how can I send metadata updates to a running mountpoint in Icecast? Thanks -- __________________________________________________________ | , , | | / \ | | ((__-^^-,-^^-__)) Octavio Rossell Tabet | | `-_---' `---_-' octavio at

This is exactly what I want. I have a continuous stream to a live mountpoint that needs to be metadata updates. Is this http request you mention any documentation to study? El 02/09/10 08:43, Johann Soukup escribi?: > Hi Octavio, > > I guess you are talking about live mount points. > > We use a http request through the admin/metadata application of the > Icecast admin

I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> So, if your mail hosting provider enforces dmarc,(gmail does) and you >> get mail from a list that doesn't rewrite the headers, and people >> from places like yahoo post to the list,

On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> >>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >>>> So, if your mail hosting provider

I have been using PXELINUX for a while and appreciate all you guys are doing! I have a couple of questions re PXELINUX: 1. I am experiencing problems with the LOCALBOOT statement on an IBM x3650. IBM mentions the following: http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-5084755 I am using PXELINUX 4.04. Is this problem still attributed to some bug in PXELINUX? Right now I

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: <snip/> > > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties > > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure. > > The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject > > We shall see how

> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > <snip/>

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this >> message, >> then we have test result for the setting that was changed >> wednesday. > > test Patrick, Due to Yahoo!'s DMARC, you probably didn't see the other two tests I already sent as I didn't see

>If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this > message, > then we have test result for the setting that was changed > wednesday. test