similar to: [PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "[PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20"

2014 Sep 18
4
[PATCH] remove _BSD_SOURCE definition
The _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated since glibc-2.20. _DEFAULT_SOURCE can be used instead of _BSD_SOURCE. However, there is no need to include _BSD_SOURCE because the sources only have inline functions and calls memcmp/cpy functions. Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> --- dos/getsetsl.c | 1 - libinstaller/fs.c | 1 - libinstaller/syslxmod.c | 1 - 3 files
2014 Sep 24
0
[PATCH] remove _BSD_SOURCE definition
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> wrote: > The _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated since glibc-2.20. _DEFAULT_SOURCE can be > used instead of _BSD_SOURCE. However, there is no need to include > _BSD_SOURCE because the sources only have inline functions and calls > memcmp/cpy functions. Testing this myself on my build boxes, I see no issue. The
2014 Sep 25
2
[PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ferenc Wagner [mailto:wferi at niif.hu] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:42 PM > To: Chanho Park > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] [PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20 > > Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> writes: > > > _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated in favour of
2014 Sep 18
0
[PATCH] remove _BSD_SOURCE definition
The _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated since glibc-2.20. _DEFAULT_SOURCE can be used instead of _BSD_SOURCE. However, there is no need to include _BSD_SOURCE because the sources only have inline functions and calls memcmp/cpy functions. Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> --- dos/getsetsl.c | 1 - libinstaller/fs.c | 1 - libinstaller/syslxmod.c | 1 - 3 files
2014 Sep 25
0
[PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20
Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> writes: > _BSD_SOURCE was deprecated in favour of _DEFAULT_SOURCE since glibc > 2.20[1]. To avoid build warning on glibc2.20, _DEFAULT_SOURCE should > also be defined. Why exactly is _BSD_SOURCE (or _DEFAULT_SOURCE) needed in the Syslinux sources? Maybe it would be worth pointing out in a comment. -- Thanks, Feri.
2014 Sep 27
0
[PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Chanho Park <chanho61.park at samsung.com> wrote: > Hi, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ferenc Wagner [mailto:wferi at niif.hu] >> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:42 PM >> To: Chanho Park >> Cc: syslinux at zytor.com >> Subject: Re: [syslinux] [PATCH] define _DEFAULT_SOURCE for glibc-2.20 >>
2016 Mar 06
0
[PATCH 3/5] installers: MSVC compatibility fixes
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Pete Batard via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > More MSVC compatibility fixes, for packed structures. > NB: In case you are aware of the issues that may come with MS vs GCC > packing, so far, I have not seen evidence of detrimental impact from using > ms_struct packing in MSVC (vs gcc_struct, which is explicitly specified for >
2008 Nov 04
1
Issues compiling syslinux-3.72 on Linux 2.6.25(.19)
Howdy. I'm one of the maintainers of Astlinux (www.astlinux.org). We're updating the kernel from 2.6.20, to 2.6.25 (.19), and as such, some packages that previously compiled stopped doing so. We also went from syslinux-3.63 to syslinux-3.72, hoping that a newer version would be more amenable to a more recent kernel. No joy. We're cross-compiling on FC8 (updated) on an i386
2012 Aug 02
0
[PATCH 1/3] ALPHA: make sector size dynamic in extlinux
This is part of some patches to support sectors > 512. Currently I'm able to boot a Ubuntu kernel but seems that mboot is not working for some reason. This patch try to fix first stage of extlinux bootloader but have some problems with ADV Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio at citrix.com> --- dos/syslinux.c | 2 +- extlinux/main.c | 36
2016 Feb 25
2
[PATCH 2/5] ntfs: remove unused variable and have ntfssect use char API calls
Hi Shao, On 2016.02.24 23:43, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: > Did you happen to notice anything unusual when compiling with MinGW > under Linux, once 'ok' was removed? I seem to recall warnings about > unused results, but not of unused objects. Maybe that's an incorrect > recollection or maybe it's ancient history, however. I got no warnings with the patch on
2011 Oct 05
0
[GIT PULL] NTFS readonly file system support
This is the initial NTFS file system support for Syslinux :-) The following changes since commit 67954e370003d9bbfd8b58042669f2e9d532636f: ifmemdsk: remove spurious +x bit (2011-08-25 10:58:44 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/pcacjr/syslinux.git ntfs-for-hpa Paulo Alcantara (34): Add NTFS filesystem support to Linux and Windows installers Initial
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] mtools: Remove local xpread/xpwrite, use ones from syslxcom
From: Nicolas Cornu <ncornu at aldebaran.com> --- mtools/Makefile | 1 + mtools/syslinux.c | 59 +------------------------------------------------------ 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/mtools/Makefile b/mtools/Makefile index 0d0b1b2..c980420 100755 --- a/mtools/Makefile +++ b/mtools/Makefile @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SRCS = syslinux.c \
2016 Mar 07
1
[PATCH 3/5] installers: MSVC compatibility fixes
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Shao Miller via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > On 3/6/2016 17:03, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote: >> >> The problem was due to the following warning when compiling for 64-bit >> using using the latest WDK (7600.16385.1), with warning level 3 (/W3): >> >> 1>c:\rufus\src\syslinux\libinstaller\syslxmod.c(44) :
2016 Mar 06
3
[PATCH 3/5] installers: MSVC compatibility fixes
Hi Shao, You're right, "a=b=<immediate value>;" wasn't the actual issue. On 2016.03.06 20:34, Shao Miller via Syslinux wrote: > If this change is simply due to a mental note about an incident where a > compiler once complained about this type of thing The problem was due to the following warning when compiling for 64-bit using using the latest WDK (7600.16385.1),
2016 Mar 07
0
[PATCH 3/5] installers: MSVC compatibility fixes
On 3/6/2016 17:03, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote: > The problem was due to the following warning when compiling for 64-bit > using using the latest WDK (7600.16385.1), with warning level 3 (/W3): > > 1>c:\rufus\src\syslinux\libinstaller\syslxmod.c(44) : warning C4242: > '=' : conversion from 'sector_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data Then your
2019 Apr 22
0
Installing syslinux on a purely virtual disk
Richard W.M. Jones via Syslinux wrote: > I'm trying to add boot support to > https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/tree/master/plugins/floppy > > This NBD server plugin generates a completely virtual FAT filesystem > and partition table. Nothing is ever written to a file, and it must > run without anything needing to be root, loop mounting etc. Running > "syslinux
2011 Apr 15
0
[GIT PULL] syslinux command-line
The following changes since commit 868c474546ba68e9e448734e1833f873fd50ec0a: diskstart: Add a pointer to the syslinux_banner to the EPA (2011-04-04 17:40:59 -0700) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/pcacjr/syslinux.git syslinux-update-for-hpa Paulo Alcantara (4): libinstaller: implement syslinux_already_installed extlinux: use syslinux_already_installed
2016 Jun 04
0
[PATCH] Wedding gift, removing double l from auxilliary
This patch changes only strings, no program code. It is would be nice if it goes in the 6.04 release. Reported-by: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> How this patch was prepared, how the editting for this patch was done Where is auxiliary written with double l? git grep -i auxilliary Which files are effect git grep -li auxilliary Changing the those files with the streaming editor sed
2010 Jun 07
0
[PATCH] extlinux: Add the --menu-save option to set the MENU SAVE value from the running system using extlinux
--- extlinux/main.c | 9 ++++++++- libinstaller/syslxopt.c | 8 +++++++- libinstaller/syslxopt.h | 1 + man/extlinux.1 | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 0669bb9..8a0ac63 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -381,6 +381,13 @@ int modify_adv(void) rv = -1; } } +
2016 Mar 05
2
build problems with 6.04-pre1
hello everybody, apologies if I'm missing something here Just tried to build 6.04-pre1 test version with: make bios installer and found some problems all (seemingly) related to inaccurate paths in various Makefiles. I enclose a complete patch at the end of this email, which details the problems I found and how they got fixed for me. As an example, this is the first error I got: