Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures"
2014 Jul 02
1
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
Op 2014-07-01 om 22:55 schreef Gene Cumm:
> On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" wrote:
> >
> > I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some
> > advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18
> > at the moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior,
> > also with pxelinux.0, so
2014 Jul 02
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" <aperlis at math.lsu.edu> wrote:
>
> I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some
advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18 at the
moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior, also with
pxelinux.0, so although I'll give pre18 a try soon, some
2014 Jul 02
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/01/2014 09:55 PM, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" <aperlis at math.lsu.edu
> > I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 ...
>
> Odd. 4.07 should be good but the 4.10/5.1*/6.0* revisions make sense.
My bad. I tried again, and in 4.07 we do get further. We couldn't boot
all the way because, it seems, using
2014 Nov 15
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
On 15 Nov 2014 05:06:52 +0200, Ady wrote:
>
> I would start by updating the BIOS.
Prudent advice. As it turns out, I'm already at the latest version.
On 15 Nov 2014 07:31:27 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> And would reduce 'iPXE => pxe.0 => lpxelinux.0 => "vmlinux"'
> into 'iPXE => "vmlinux"'
That makes sense generally, but at
2014 Nov 15
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
On this list in early July 2014 I reported that on certain hardware one
cannot chain from ipxe to lpxelinux.0 . My report at the time was about
6.03-pre17. I've repeated the tests with the release version of 6.03 and
here is an updated report with more details.
I boot to a USB stick with iPXE, which then is told to "dhcp" and then
"chain http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/pxe.0".
2014 Jul 04
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/03/2014 06:31 AM, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2014 11:13 AM, Alexander Perlis wrote:
>
> > Or is there a different (non-ipxe?) way we can locally boot a machine
> and get it to chain to our 6.0x pxelinux server?
>
> Unless this is a completely isolated network, talk with your IT department.
>
> If there's no DHCP, make a simple server. If there's DHCP and
2014 Jul 04
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/03/2014 08:44 PM, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote:
>
>> I suppose we could try making an ISOLINUX CD for the local boot, which then
>> uses pxechn.c32 to connect to our PXE server?
>
> pxechn.c32 requires a functional PXELINUX.
If I understand the issue correctly, is it that pxelinux.0 does not have
a network stack and
2014 Jul 10
2
lpxelinux hangs under Intel Boot Agent 1.3.81 (2.1 build 089) on Dell Optiplex 990 BIOS A16
Trying to PXE boot a Dell Optiplex 990 with BIOS A16, which has Intel
Boot Agent 1.3.81 (2.1 build 089). It gets network and launches
lpxelinux.0, I see the PXELINUX banner line, but there it hangs.
I tried both 6.03-pre18 and 5.10, same hanging behavior. If I instead
use pxelinux.0 or gpxelinux.0, either 6.03-pre18 or 5.10 or 4.07, there
are no problems. The problem seems isolated to
2014 Jul 03
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On Jul 2, 2014 11:13 AM, "Alexander Perlis" <aperlis at math.lsu.edu> wrote:
> Or is there a different (non-ipxe?) way we can locally boot a machine and
get it to chain to our 6.0x pxelinux server?
Unless this is a completely isolated network, talk with your IT department.
If there's no DHCP, make a simple server. If there's DHCP and no boot info,
add a PXE server
2014 Jul 10
2
lpxelinux hangs under Intel Boot Agent 1.3.81 (2.1 build 089) on Dell Optiplex 990 BIOS A16
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 04:07 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote:
>> Trying to PXE boot a Dell Optiplex 990 with BIOS A16, which has Intel
>> Boot Agent 1.3.81 (2.1 build 089). It gets network and launches
>> lpxelinux.0, I see the PXELINUX banner line, but there it hangs.
>>
>> I tried both 6.03-pre18
2014 Jul 04
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Perlis <aperlis at math.lsu.edu> wrote:
> I suppose we could try making an ISOLINUX CD for the local boot, which then
> uses pxechn.c32 to connect to our PXE server?
pxechn.c32 requires a functional PXELINUX.
--
-Gene
2015 Oct 24
4
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
Hi All,
I've been trying to understand how to use pxechn.c32 to chain a local
pxelinux menu item to a remote server which has it's own pxelinux hierarchy
served via TFTP and HTTP.
We have no control over DHCP next-server and filename fields so I wanted to
exploit the "prefix" -p option that pxechn.c32 accepts.
I spent a long time hitting my head against a brick wall until I
2014 Jun 25
3
testing out 6.03 network booting...
> > From: Matt Fleming [matt at console-pimps.org]
> > Sent: 25 June 2014 07:39
> > To: Andrew Rae
> > Cc: Gene Cumm; syslinux at zytor.com
> > Subject: Re: [syslinux] testing out 6.03 network booting...
> >
> > Andrew, could you try out syslinux-6.03-pre18? Peter pushed the release
> > button yesterday and -pre18 contains my change. It would be
2014 Jun 25
2
testing out 6.03 network booting...
On Sun, 22 Jun, at 06:15:50PM, Andrew Rae wrote:
>
> Matt - I'd love to try it - but I'm not so good at fixing compiling
> issues. right now I get stuck at being unable to 'make' the efi32 or
> efi64 components due to an error:
Andrew, could you try out syslinux-6.03-pre18? Peter pushed the release
button yesterday and -pre18 contains my change. It would be good to
2014 Nov 15
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
> Now my question: where more specifically is the bug? What can I do to
> help a developer isolate this?
I would start by updating the BIOS.
2015 Oct 25
4
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux
<syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115
A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some
understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further
development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE
development to iPXE.
--
2016 Feb 26
3
lpxelinux.0 with device that doesn't support Interrupts
I am experiencing an issue where I ran ipxe (as an option rom) and downloaded the lpxelinux.0 as the bootloader.
Next it should download the ldlinux.c32 file using UNDI API.
but before that it will close and open the underlying device (which is ipxe), and hooking the device interrupt so it can start getting some packets.
What I'm experiencing is that if the underlying device doesn't
2013 Oct 26
3
lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
Hello Geert
Thanks for replying.. But i think i can?t use it, as i don?t reach the point where the debug module will be available.. it just pulls the lpxelinux.0 and tries to get the next download-- the ldlinux.c32 and it fails...and freezes.
And the next step would be other modules i think.. if i?m wrong.. excuse me 8-).. yesterday i managed to get ipxelinux working from ipxe.org.. so the nic
2014 Jun 17
1
Chainload pxelinux from pxelinux and pass parameters or change root dir?
On 06/16/2014 05:14 PM, Gene Cumm wrote:
> This sounds like you're using gpxelinux.0 4.07 which as I stated will
> introduce issues. Instead of using gpxelinux.0 4.07, try pxelinux.0
> 4.07 then do your chainload to lpxelinux.0 6.02. If this doesn't
> solve it, try 6.03-pre14.
When I DHCP boot to lpxelinux.0 6.02, and then pxechn.c32 back to
lpxelinux.0 6.02 with the http
2014 Jul 27
1
pxelinux HTTP transport UEFI vmlinuz
Op 2014-07-23 om 17:57 schreef Gene Cumm:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since which version of pxelinux.0 is understood in pxelinux.cfg/default that
> >
> > kernel http://host.lan/netboot/vmlinuz
> >
> > means vmlinuz should be transported over HTTP?
>
> For non-EFI