similar to: xorriso or genisoimage syntax assistance

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Mattias Schlenker <ms at mattiasschlenker.de>wrote: [...] > Build a recent xorriso - this can be run from the build directory without > installing (thanks, Thomas!): > > ./configure --enable-static > > Thank you for pointing this out, I tried desperately to statically compile `mkisofs' yesterday, to no avail. To hear that xorriso is

Hi, > # Most linux distros dont have `mkisofs' Or they have genisoimage under the name "mkisofs". (e.g. Debian, Archlinux) > mkisofs \ > -o output.iso \ > -no-emul-boot \ > -boot-info-table \ > -boot-load-size 4 \ > -c isolinux/boot.cat \ > -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ > ISO_root I would add option -R or -r for Rock Ridge names and file

Am 01.02.2014 22:34, schrieb Dean Graff: > Could someone help me get the syntax for `genisoimage' and/or `xorriso' > correct? Apparently it is not in many linux distros so below my little > HOWTO shows how to compile it. ( which adds tons of crap that can go wrong) Build a recent xorriso - this can be run from the build directory without installing (thanks, Thomas!):

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup at gmx.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > # Most linux distros dont have `mkisofs' ( > > Or they have genisoimage under the name "mkisofs". > (e.g. Debian, Archlinux) > ... > I would add option -R or -r for Rock Ridge names and file attributes. > This will make appear the files with their original

Hi, > If any of you have time, let me know if it > looks wrong or if I missed anything anyone suggested. Nitpicking: Consider whether to use -r instead of -R, i.e. whether to make up ownership and permissions for publishing, or whether to preserve the ownership and permission as in ISO_root. The latter (-R) is more suitable for backup purposes, or if you have reason to have multiple

I got this figured out much faster than I thought I would. Thanks to all of your help, Peter, Mattias, Thomas and Helmut. And Thomas, that 8 partition live OS sounds right up my alley, and I will definitely check it out. The second partition is working well with `parted' and `fdisk', so I am quite pleased. Below is, again, "what I came up with". I tried to integrate each of your

Hello everyone, I am maintaining a distribution loosely based on LFS and am now trying to add UEFI support. Integrating a FAT formatted partition image containing, preloader, gummiboot, kernel and initramfs correctly results in a ISO image that is bootable on BIOS and UEFI systems if booted from the optical drive. However, when I run isohybrid --uefi name-of.iso the resulting GPT entry for

> Hello, > > Ady via Syslinux said on Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:57:02PM +0300: > >Can 'syslinux.efi' v.6.03 boot some media formatted with ISO9660? > > Not at this time, no. > > It took me quite some time to find that :-( Google didn't really help. > > I'd like to get a bit more details on this issue: > > 1/ Using syslinux.efi for PXE

Add very basic pages for: isohybrid - It's not particularly more useful than --help, but my QA department really wants this to exist. memdiskfind - Explain what it does and its invocation. Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones at redhat.com> --- man/isohybrid.1 | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ man/memdiskfind.1 | 10 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 71

On 02/01/2014 02:48 PM, Dean Graff wrote: > Sorry, i should have been more clear. I am just trying to understand how > to do this same thing with xorriso or genisoimage, Debian for instance, > has both of these, but does not have `mkisofs'. I was hoping to write > the guide so that it could be used from debian, and hopefully take > advantage of the `xorriso' option which

I posted this on the bugzilla page but I figured that on the mailing list it would get more attention. Please see http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49 for a description of my current issue. -- Thank you, Fernando Reyes GPG BDD75DD7 Mission Accomplish, Inc. http://missionaccomplish.com Email:design at missionaccomplish.com Tel: 7187100008 Cell: 3479275477

Hi, On 23/06/2014 12:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote:> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. Caveat emptor: this is a review by an end user (not a developer), who

On 02/01/2014 01:34 PM, Dean Graff wrote: > Could someone help me get the syntax for `genisoimage' and/or `xorriso' > correct? Apparently it is not in many linux distros so below my little > HOWTO shows how to compile it. What Linux distribution does *not* have one or the other? -hpa

Hi, (My apologies to Geert Stappers for the inappropriate branch which i grafted on his thread today. It still grows. But i do my share to dry it out by replying to a message in the correct thread. :)) Dean Graff wrote: > But I really want to push xorriso to its limits. Be invited. > -partition_offset 16 \ This makes the partition table look more normal. But it should not be a hard

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Dean Graff <graff97 at gmail.com> wrote: > [ ... ] And Thomas, that 8 partition live OS sounds right up my alley, and > I will definitely check it out. > oops. Mattias, I got you guys confused as you both helped so much. This live system you described sounds fascinating. I really want syslinux + partitioned binary hard drive image + LUKS encrypted

> Hi, > > some minor nitpicking on Ady's summary: > > > the real "genisoimage" is not really up to the task for > > UEFI-booting. > > In some distros, genisoimage offers option -e for embedding > a FAT filesystem image. > (genisoimage is a fork of mkisofs, so "real" is somewhat > misleading in respect to history.) > > For

Hi folks, I've been prompted to look at using isohybrid for the Debian CD images that I'm producing. This looks like a good plan for the i386/amd64 images we make, so as to make them bootable from USB by default. However, it's likely to make things slightly more difficult in terms of producing the images themselves: we want to make them available via jigdo as well as via full download

> Hi, > > > All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant. > > I just got one from > http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html > > Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl. > > Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be > variant #5 then): >

Hi, we are the developers of an alternative to mkisofs: program xorriso from libburnia-project.org . The current development cycle is about support for creating bootable CDs, DVDs, BDs. So we look for testers and for advise about ISOLINUX specifics. The example from the ISOLINUX wiki is supposed to work if you replace "mkisofs" by "xorriso -as mkisofs". I.e: xorriso -as

> Hi, > > Ady: > > _ Wiki should use more user-friendly language and "less deep" > > technical information. > > I tried to stay at the surface of isohybrid. > (Didier already asked for more depth about expert options.) My interpretation of Didier's questions is less depth and more user-friendly practical commands for end-users. Our points of view