similar to: request backport fix for isolinux 4.xx branch

A question was asked on the IRC channel about how to get the address of a real-mode symbol -- or any assembly symbol in general. The answer is that you have to declare it global. In NASM syntax: global func func: In GAS syntax: .globl func func: -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

This version cleans up the Ethersel (PCI config probing) changes I have been iterating with Alex Heinz. It's not the same code (so please test, especially Alex), but it should work the same. As before, if you have a machine for which 2.13 worked and 3.0x hasn't worked, please test this version too. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ -hpa

Attached patch allows isolinux to boot from a CDROM attached to a NCR/Symbios/LSIlogic SCSI controller (bios version 4.19). It appears this bios can't read more than 1 sector at the time using the ah=42h int13 call. The isolinux boot was failing early on when 4 sector are read. (bios returned error 0 !) I'm not sure if the same 'getlinsec' routine is called upon later to load

Folks, I've just spun a 4.07 prerelease. People were asking for a release that contained the commits that have been sitting in the master branch, and I've heard that distros are packaging the master branch just to get at them. --- Matt Fleming (4): extlinux: Avoid dereferencing a garbage pointer Merge branch 'searchdir_leak-406' of

Personal background: Much of my experience is with C on Linux (from 1994). I can read Assembly, however, not write it well (I have had formal training in Assembly on the I386, however, never used it). The system: An AMD 586 embedded system with AM29F040 Chip(s) on board. These two flash chips make up the BIOS and the primary storage. The system was designed and built for use with Caldera

I recently tried using the latest GParted Live iso (0.16.2-11 i686 PAE) on a few circa-2004 Dell desktops (e.g. Dimension 8400, Precision 370, OptiPlex 170L, all with latest BIOS). However nothing would appear onscreen after selecting cdrom boot. I managed to modify the iso and use isolinux-debug.bin, and the output I always received was: ISOLINUX 6.02 2013-10-13 Copyright (C) H. Peter Anvin et

On 11/25/2013 04:12 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > I made some more and more experiments beyond LBA 65535 > > Works: * isolinux-4.07.bin (size 24574) * isolinux-5.00.bin (size > 34816) > > Does not work: * isolinux-5.01.bin (size 34816) * isolinux-5.10.bin > (size 36864) * isolinux-6.00.bin (size 38912) * isolinux-6.02.bin > (size 43008) > > * I just

> > It looks like Clonezilla and Ultimate Boot CD both prescribe > special installation procedures for USB stick. > isohybrids can be put onto stick just by e.g.: dd of=/dev/sdb > Make a backup of the stick if you later want to restore its > partitioning. > The (recent yet not latest) versions of Clonezilla that used Syslinux 5.xx will fail in some systems when writing

> Could you perhaps test the attached patch and see what it does to your > system? > -hpa > diff -u -r1.181 ldlinux.asm > --- ldlinux.asm 18 Jan 2005 13:13:50 -0000 1.181 > +++ ldlinux.asm 3 Aug 2005 00:28:18 -0000 > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ > ; > ; We have EDD support... > ; > - mov byte

On 11/25/2013 04:39 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> Looks like there is something beyond LBA 65535 (As Mattias confirmed) > > I wanted to ask him now, whether this was already with > version 6. > But meanwhile he reported that it was 5. > > >> I can push isolinux.bin (4.07) to a really high LBA address and boot

Asterisk is behind firewall, I'm able to register with the provider. Calls are coming IN OK, but when I try to call out I got: Got SIP response 603 "Declined" back from 81.15.xx.xx -- #Joseph

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

Hi all, What does 'Got reject for frame...' message really mean, what could be causing it, and how should one start troubleshooting it? Thanks in advance, Alex

On 01/06/2016 03:24, Ady via Syslinux wrote:> @Didier, > > There were several potential fixes and improvements that were never > back-ported to the "syslinux-4.xx" branch. The very few commits in that > branch could be added to interested distributions without releasing a > new official version. > > Moreover, there were potential new features / additions that

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 08:00:49PM +0200, Didier Spaier via Syslinux wrote: > > Thanks for your answer Ady. > > However, I cloned the repo and "git branch" only returns: > * master > > How can I find this "syslinux-4.xx" branch or at least spot the commits > in that branch more recent than the 4.07 release? > > A did a bit of RTFM but am not

Hi David, We have a general problem using Augeas in libguestfs and I wonder if you have any advice. The problem is that we often -- as with yesterday's patch -- add new config file paths to lenses. Or we want to parse config files which are not necessarily in the exact paths that Augeas is expecting. Now it's easy enough to parse such files using an arbitrary lens by calling

> On 01/06/2016 03:24, Ady via Syslinux wrote:> @Didier, > > > > There were several potential fixes and improvements that were never > > back-ported to the "syslinux-4.xx" branch. The very few commits in that > > branch could be added to interested distributions without releasing a > > new official version. > > > > Moreover, there were

> On 01/06/2016 00:28, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > > There seem to be a bunch of bug fixes in the 6.04 branch that people > > really need. Do we know of any current regressions? Otherwise we > > really ought to just push the button... > > I am a user of syslinux 4.0.7 to boot installers on BIOS aka Legacy. > > Knowing that 4.0.7 has been released on

I have a data set where one column consists of two numerical factors, separated by a "-". So my data looks something like this: 43-156 43-43 1267-18 . . . There are additional columns consisting of single factors as well, so reading the csv file (where the data is stored) with the sep="-" addition won't work since the rest of the factors are separated by commas. So first

I have just built a new system using an HP DL360G7 with a TE420 T1 card, and this is the first system using a generation 7 server. I'm not sure whether that is an issue or not. I am using Asterisk 1.2, and Zaptel 1.4.12.1 with patches for GEN5 of the TE420 card. I have successfully used this combination on several systems based on the DL360G6 and TE420(gen5), which have been in production for