similar to: lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32"

2013 Oct 26
0
lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Petry Roman, SHS-S IT-TS <Roman.Petry at shsservices.org> wrote: > Hello Geert > Thanks for replying.. But i think i can?t use it, as i don?t reach the point where the debug module will be available.. it just pulls the lpxelinux.0 and tries to get the next download-- the ldlinux.c32 and it fails...and freezes. You're right. Since you can't
2013 Nov 04
1
lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
Hello Gene, >>>They're flags to indicate the behavior of the UNDI interface. >>>Unfortunately, my first suspicion appears to be wrong. A flags value of 0x81b does not indicate that the UNDI interrupts should be used. So we/you or i am on a dead end to get it running or debugged ? is there hope to get it more debugged , with a special build or so ? someone wanting to port
2013 Oct 29
1
lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
O.K Here we go: 8-) Pxelinux 4.10 4.10-pre22 Copyright ..... !PXE entry point found (we hope) at 9073:00F6 via plan A UNDI code segment at 9073 len 216A UNDI data segment at 9059 len 01A0 UNDI: baseio ec00 int 11 MTU 1500 type 1 "DIX+802.3" flags 0x81b Getting cached Packet 01 02 03 MY IP addr seems to be 172.31.126.10 UNDI : IRQ11(0x73):0a63:4f9b -> 0000:8de2 Mac: Addr: 80 ee 73
2013 Oct 23
1
lpxelinux.0 - 6.02 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
Hello, after spending some time searching the mailing list and chatting via irc with some nice people i have to come to the list to ask for help. First thanks again to some IRC guys: genec for taking some time and to Ady2.. First some background. I need to boot a 250mb initrd to some(later all) of our thinclients , at the moment i?m using tftp but as we all know performance is bad. I
2015 Oct 25
4
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --
2020 Nov 03
2
syslinux.efi does not seem to support HTTP like lpxelinux.0 does?
Hello everybody, I been using lpxelinux.0 with legacy boot to load KERNEL over http instead of tftp and I want to switch to efi boot. Thank you for the great tech! However it seems the syslinux.efi does not support HTTP / IP? How can I get efi boot load syslinux with an IP stack? # dpkg -S /usr/lib/SYSLINUX.EFI/efi64/syslinux.efi syslinux-efi: /usr/lib/SYSLINUX.EFI/efi64/syslinux.efi # dpkg
2013 Oct 18
1
[ipxe-devel] Remove gpxe or replace with ipxe?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brown <mbrown at fensystems.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/10/13 10:45, Robin Smidsr?d wrote: >> >> On 09.10.2013 02:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either >>> replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to >>> integrate
2014 Nov 15
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
On 15 Nov 2014 05:06:52 +0200, Ady wrote: > > I would start by updating the BIOS. Prudent advice. As it turns out, I'm already at the latest version. On 15 Nov 2014 07:31:27 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > And would reduce 'iPXE => pxe.0 => lpxelinux.0 => "vmlinux"' > into 'iPXE => "vmlinux"' That makes sense generally, but at
2014 Jul 02
3
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18 at the moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior, also with pxelinux.0, so although I'll give pre18 a try soon, some isolation/troubleshooting advice will be a good education no matter what.) To get to our PXE-launched tools from
2014 Jul 02
1
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
Op 2014-07-01 om 22:55 schreef Gene Cumm: > On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" wrote: > > > > I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 but I need some > > advice on how to isolate and troubleshoot this. (I can't try pre18 > > at the moment, but did try 4.07 and 5.10 and saw similar behavior, > > also with pxelinux.0, so
2016 Feb 26
3
lpxelinux.0 with device that doesn't support Interrupts
I am experiencing an issue where I ran ipxe (as an option rom) and downloaded the lpxelinux.0 as the bootloader. Next it should download the ldlinux.c32 file using UNDI API. but before that it will close and open the underlying device (which is ipxe), and hooking the device interrupt so it can start getting some packets. What I'm experiencing is that if the underlying device doesn't
2015 Oct 24
4
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
Hi All, I've been trying to understand how to use pxechn.c32 to chain a local pxelinux menu item to a remote server which has it's own pxelinux hierarchy served via TFTP and HTTP. We have no control over DHCP next-server and filename fields so I wanted to exploit the "prefix" -p option that pxechn.c32 accepts. I spent a long time hitting my head against a brick wall until I
2016 Feb 26
2
lpxelinux.0 with device that doesn't support Interrupts
hi does anyone know if there are some known issues with running lpxelinux.0 with device that doesn't support Interrupts? i.e. irq function is null...
2014 Nov 15
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
On this list in early July 2014 I reported that on certain hardware one cannot chain from ipxe to lpxelinux.0 . My report at the time was about 6.03-pre17. I've repeated the tests with the release version of 6.03 and here is an updated report with more details. I boot to a USB stick with iPXE, which then is told to "dhcp" and then "chain http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/pxe.0".
2014 Nov 15
0
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03 inconsistencies and failures
> Now my question: where more specifically is the bug? What can I do to > help a developer isolate this? I would start by updating the BIOS.
2014 Jul 02
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/01/2014 09:55 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Jul 1, 2014 10:37 PM, "Alexander Perlis" <aperlis at math.lsu.edu > > I believe I'm seeing a bug in lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 ... > > Odd. 4.07 should be good but the 4.10/5.1*/6.0* revisions make sense. My bad. I tried again, and in 4.07 we do get further. We couldn't boot all the way because, it seems, using
2014 Jul 04
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/03/2014 08:44 PM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Alexander Perlis wrote: > >> I suppose we could try making an ISOLINUX CD for the local boot, which then >> uses pxechn.c32 to connect to our PXE server? > > pxechn.c32 requires a functional PXELINUX. If I understand the issue correctly, is it that pxelinux.0 does not have a network stack and
2013 Aug 17
3
Which version shall i choose ?
THX, helps a lot On 17.08.2013 15:09 Gene Cumm wrote: > Can you deal with a client taking 1-4 minutes to just fetch files? If > not, you will have a performance issue. > Unfortunally not, the performance issue is known )-: > > Where does startrom.0 come from? Some Windows file? > I don't know, it is build by the company where we get the .nbis from > > So planning
2014 Jul 04
2
iPXE chain to lpxelinux.0 6.03-pre17 inconsistencies and failures
On 07/03/2014 06:31 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Jul 2, 2014 11:13 AM, Alexander Perlis wrote: > > > Or is there a different (non-ipxe?) way we can locally boot a machine > and get it to chain to our 6.0x pxelinux server? > > Unless this is a completely isolated network, talk with your IT department. > > If there's no DHCP, make a simple server. If there's DHCP and
2015 Oct 25
0
Confusion on lpxelinux vs. gpxelinux vs. ipxe vs gpxe.
On 25/10/15 01:04, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > >> Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 > > A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some > understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further > development as of a