similar to: Remove gpxe or replace with ipxe?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Michael Brown <mbrown at fensystems.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/10/13 10:45, Robin Smidsr?d wrote: >> >> On 09.10.2013 02:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either >>> replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to >>> integrate

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Alexandre Blanchette > <blanalex at gmail.com> wrote: > > In PXELinux 4.06 (the vanilla version, not gpxelinux.0), I'm trying to > use > > pxechn.c32 to call iPXE (undionly) with option 67 set to call an iPXE > > script. > > > > The

> The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either > replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to > integrate with iPXE themselves. > > What do people think? My vote is replace with iPXE. I've manually replaced gPXE with iPXE for years, works like charm. I suggest updating the Makefile to use undionly.kkkpxe because of the change

In PXELinux 4.06 (the vanilla version, not gpxelinux.0), I'm trying to use pxechn.c32 to call iPXE (undionly) with option 67 set to call an iPXE script. The relevant portion of my PXELinux config looks like this: LABEL MDT MENU LABEL ^B - MDT 2012 SP1 com32 pxechn.c32 APPEND undionly.kpxe -o 67.s=ipxe/mdt.ipxe However iPXE doesn't seem to get the option correctly, it goes into

For me the motivation for gpxelinux.0 was the HTTP support. If this would work reliably in newer versions then I could happily live without a iPXE-based pxelinux. On 9 October 2013 13:36, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > > > The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either > >

I installed CentOS6 with the xen4centos set of packages; then I tried to install KVM (for performance comparison), I got the following error in YUM: --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/gpxe/e1000-0x100e.rom for package: 2:qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4.x86_64 Package gpxe-roms-qemu is obsoleted by ipxe-roms-qemu, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements I manually

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --

Hi All, I've been trying to understand how to use pxechn.c32 to chain a local pxelinux menu item to a remote server which has it's own pxelinux hierarchy served via TFTP and HTTP. We have no control over DHCP next-server and filename fields so I wanted to exploit the "prefix" -p option that pxechn.c32 accepts. I spent a long time hitting my head against a brick wall until I

syslinux 3.86 and 4.00-pre55 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gzp/src/syslinux-4.00-pre55/gpxe/src' [AR] bin/blib.a ar: creating bin/blib.a [HOSTCC] util/zbin [LD] bin/undionly.kkpxe.tmp arch/i386/scripts/i386.lds:1: undefined symbol `_max_align' referenced in expression make[2]: *** [bin/undionly.kkpxe.tmp] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory

Hello. We are using gpxelinux from SYSLINUX 4.02. We recently purchased some HP Proliant BL460c G6 servers with Broadcom BCM 57711 10Gbit NICS. We have a very simple pxelinux.gpxe script compiled into gpxelinux.0: #!gpxe set use-cached 1 dhcp net0 chain http://webserver/gpxe/gpxe.php?IP=${net0/ip} The PHP script dynamically creates a config file that looks something like this: #!gpxe set

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either > replace it with iPXE or just drop it, giving people a recipe for how to > integrate with iPXE themselves. > > What do people think? Do you mean a recipe for creating [gi]pxelinux.0 or for deploying iPXE and using pxelinux on top of that? Is there any

Hello ! I am completely new to syslinux. I followed this instruction manually: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pxe.html I am on debian and do not have syslinux installed, but using this debian box as a tftp server. I had to modify the instructions given by the installation above. I downloaded the 6.02 version and copied the files to the tftp root. I am using dnsmasq as a tftp

On Jul 16, 2013 2:01 PM, "Alexandre Blanchette" <blanalex at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Alexandre Blanchette > > <blanalex at gmail.com> wrote: > > > In PXELinux 4.06 (the vanilla version, not gpxelinux.0), I'm trying to >

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Now I have something I can reproduce. Booting my same ipxe.iso to > perform an initial TFTP load shows what I saw already. Attempting to > load a file via http results in an immediate error message with no > resulting traffic as far as I can see. OK. Found it. core/fs/pxe/pxe.h disabled all of the

Randy McAnally wrote: > > Thank you so much, this is the kind of news I needed! > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: "Arends, R.R." <r.r.arends at hro.nl> > To: "Randy McAnally" <rsm at fast-serv.com> > Cc: <gpxe at etherboot.org> > Sent: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:10:56 +0100 > Subject: Re: [gPXE] localboot 0 hang on some

If there is anything that you think should have been in Syslinux 4.04 which isn't there please holler now. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

Possibly authority variable (initialized with NULL) might be dereferenced when an arbitrary path (without "//" on it) is supplied to parse_uri() function Signed-off-by: Felipe Pena <felipensp at gmail.com> --- gpxe/src/core/uri.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gpxe/src/core/uri.c b/gpxe/src/core/uri.c index 6a1f2e5..4987821 100644 ---

Hello, I saw this in the release notes for 4.00: "PXELINUX: TFTP URL syntax (tftp://) supported even when not running gPXE/gpxelinux" I can't find any info describing this new functionality (searched wiki and mailing list), I'm guessing you can now use tftp:// in the paths, e g: LABEL mylabel KERNEL tftp://servername/path/to/mykernel APPEND myoptions Correct? I've

Dear developer, I am working on a project for my graduate work (diploma), which includes iSCSI and AOE booting. I made some menus using pxelinux and things are working fine with linux, but I have a small problem with windows system which require direct iscsi or aoe access. I have dhcpd.conf setup that it to each first dhcp request handles out pxelinux.0, then I can chooose from that menu which OS

Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp at free.fr> --- gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping | 10 ++++++++++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping b/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping index 1f5e115..d49416e 100644 --- a/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping +++ b/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping @@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ SP_FLAGS := $(shell $(SP_TEST)