similar to: Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 - (usage/install)

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Change since v1: * Fix bug on dentry structure (thank you specification; btw, sarcasm), and consequently a bug on ufs_readdir. * Add readlink support (applied tests for symlinks whose destionation path were stored in blk pointers and the file itself). * Several improvements. Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> Wrote the documentation below. I think it would be good to push the doc to the wiki as soon as the UFS support gets merged. Unix Fast File System (UFS/FFS) 1/2 on Syslinux - (usage/install) ----- There is a confusion about the name of this file system, then I decided to contact the author who replied: "The name has always been

Hi Dears, I am having trouble mounting a partition with UFS file system (FreeBSD), I am trying to build with the following commands: mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = ufs2 / dev/hdb1 / part mount-r-t-o ufs ufstype = 44bsd / dev/hdb1 / part But appears the following error message: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on / dev/hdb1, missing codepage or other error In some

From: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> It's already loading modules successfully, booting Linux, and both UFS version 1 and 2 seem to be working correctly. Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- core/fs/ufs/bmap.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ core/fs/ufs/ufs.c | 404 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It's already loading modules successfully, and both UFS version 1 and 2 seems to be working correctly. Special thanks to Paulo Alcantara and Matt Fleming for being always ready to help me and give feedback. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- core/fs/ufs/bmap.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ core/fs/ufs/ufs.c | 404

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307

On Fri, 12 Jul, at 08:31:27PM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: > @@ -575,7 +594,7 @@ bail: > return 1; > } > > -/* btrfs has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > +/* btrfs/ufs2 has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > is not managered by btrfs tree, so actually this is not installed as files. > since the cow

Hello, I'm running centos5 with the centosplus kernel v2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 and i'm trying to read a drive that has a ufs2 partition on it. It was originally in a FreeBSD machine and has some data i'd like to get at. Googling indicated this should work with the command: mount -r -t ufs -o ufstype=ufs2 <device> <mountpoint> device is /dev/hdb5 and mountpoint is /mnt.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:16:45PM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > Is r/w to a UFS partition using 'guestmount' still an impossibility? > From everything I've found, it seems to be something that is not > possible at the moment. I was just wondering if that has changed or > if there are plans to change that? libguestfs just uses the Linux kernel's ufs driver. If the

I am building a tool to identify the file that has a specific LBA. The approach I am using is to search through each inode from number 2 up. This approach works well with UFS1 file systems as then preinitialize all the inodes. However, UFS2 does lazy inode initialization so there are always some that are basically garbage. I have not found any relaiable way to determine from the

> On May 25, 2014 3:39 AM, "Geert Stappers" <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > > > > > While going throug old posts found: > > > > Op 2013-08-31 om 17:01 schreef Raphael S.Carvalho: > > > Calc the size of ldlinux.sys from ldlinux.bin, and check if it exceeds > the limit. > > > ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and

In attach. Usage: > mkfs-opts ufs /dev/vda1 features:1 Creates UFS1 partition > mkfs-opts ufs /dev/vda1 features:2 Creates UFS2 partition. -- Nikita A Menkovich JID: menkovich at gmail.com Tel: +7 (921) 423-96-48 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: do_mkfs.ufs.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 2809 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Rename from ext2_fat_install_file to ext_common_install_file as it is use for ext, vfat, ntfs and ufs. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cornu <nicolac76 at yahoo.fr> --- extlinux/main.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/extlinux/main.c b/extlinux/main.c index 5bab712..c446c75 100644 --- a/extlinux/main.c +++ b/extlinux/main.c @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static int

We're having problems with FreeBSD 5.4, 6.0, and 6.1 and an ICP Vortex GDT8546RZ 4 port SATA RAID card in a Tyan S2460 system with dual AMD Athlon MP 1600+ CPUs. We do not have any problems with this configuration under FreeBSD 4.11, and we have the same ICP cards in Tyan based Opterion system (S2882 and S4882) run with out problems under FreeBSD 5.4 and 6.1. We can reproduce the problem on

Every few days now I get a panic like the one shown in the attached backtrace. I've made sure my filesystem is clean with fsck and even turned off write caching on my IDE drive. Maybe someone here can figure out what is wrong. Let me know if you need more information. Michael -------------- next part -------------- root@taco /usr/src/sys/compile/ZOE> gdb -k -c /opt/savecore/vmcore.0

Title: HOWTO-FreeBSD-on-XCP Author: John D. "Trix" Farrar Date: 2012-02-09 * The Challenge - ParaVirtualized FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE under XCP 1.1.0 The idea here is to create a PV FreeBSD VM under Xen Cloud Platform (XCP) without starting with an HVM first. The documentation I''''ve been able to find on-line is at least a year old and is mostly written for Xen (under

Is r/w to a UFS partition using 'guestmount' still an impossibility? From everything I've found, it seems to be something that is not possible at the moment. I was just wondering if that has changed or if there are plans to change that? Here is the issue I'm experiencing: ~# guestmount --rw -a ${disk_path}/${disk_name} -m /dev/sda4 /tmp/freebsd-master libguestfs: error:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-02:35.ffs Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: local users may read and write arbitrary blocks on an FFS filesystem Category: core

On 05/29/2014 08:29 AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:40 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >> On 05/29/2014 07:36 AM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:30 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: >>>> On 05/29/2014 07:20 AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >>>>> +static int