Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-55"
2007 Jul 03
3
XFS module
Hi,
Im using XFS on production server and waiting the release of
kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-55.0.2 on CentOSPlus Repository to update. Any
idea of release date?
Thanks.
--
Heitor A. M. Cardozo
2007 Nov 26
4
Filesystem for Maildir
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font size="-1"><font face="Verdana">Hi all,<br>
<br>
In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4
to know which filesystem is better for
2006 Sep 07
1
2.6.9.42 Kernel Panic
I just joined the mailing list after seeing this e-mail in the mailing
list archives. Does anyone have any idea as to why this may be
happening? I am having this exact problem on a Dell Poweredge 1855.
Jeremy Carrigan
****************************************Original E-mail from Mailing
List Archives********************************************
* To: <centos at xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:centos
2007 Feb 16
2
XFS for CentOS 2.6.9-42.0.8 [ was: issue - no keyboard after reboot]
Okay, so far so good - and many thanks to all who jumped in on this one.
Now, we would like to look into making some changes in XFS, but I didn't
see a SRPM for the kernel-module-xfs for 42.0.8 - the most recent one is
for 42.0.3.
Is this usable, or is there somewhere (else?) I can get the SRPM for the
42.0.8 XFS?
Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at
2006 Jun 01
3
[CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
Hi All, we've run into a problem with the xfs component in the centosplus
kernel (2.6.9-34.106.unsupportedsmp) where synchronous writes sometimes fail
with EAGAIN. It's causing headaches for DB2 installs and for our database
research group. There is a fix reported at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110808122904352&w=2
...that's supposed to take care of
2007 Feb 16
0
XFS for CentOS 2.6.9-42.0.8 [ was: issue - nokeyboard after reboot]
Got it - thanks!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org
> [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 9:59 AM
> To: CentOS ML
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] XFS for CentOS 2.6.9-42.0.8 [ was:
> issue - nokeyboard after reboot]
>
> You pass in the kernel version as an argument. You need to
2007 Dec 04
2
Outdated packages on 5.1
Hi,
A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveals that some packages
is outdated comparing with the 5.0. Here are some examples:
5.0 5.1
tzdata-2007h-1.el5 tzdata-2007d-1.el5
libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_0.1 libpng-1.2.10-7.0.2
perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2 perl-5.8.8-10
The "updates" directory on CentOS 5.1 repository does
2009 May 27
1
kABI-tracking kmod-xfs for CentOS-4 (Was: Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Here is the updated version:
>>
>> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/
>>
>> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the version/release
>> number). ?Let me know when your binaries are ready for
2009 Jan 28
2
Missing latest kmod-xfs and kmod-drbd82?
Since December there have been several kernel updates to the centosplus
repository for centos4... but no updates to kmod-xfs or kmod-drbd82.
Latest kernel is 2.6.9-78.0.13.plus.c4, but latest kmod-xfs is
2.6.9_78.0.5.plus.c4. Latest drbd82 kmod is also for 78.0.5.
I know there was a mention on the list that these modules are not kernel
dependent anymore... but yum and rpm seem to indicate
2006 Aug 15
7
XFS and CentOS 4.3
Hi All, after looking around for info on XFS(the filesystem) and its use
on CentOS and/or RHEL 4. There seems to be a lot of noise about 4K
Stacks (especially on linux-xfs at oss.sgi.com).
So what is the best way to get XFS working with CentOS 4.3 ? And not
have something like this happening.
A quote from the xfs list at sgi
>On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 at 10:29am, Andrew Elwell wrote
>
2007 Apr 25
4
Re: [CSL #329283] centosplus XFS bug?
We're running a mix of ext3 and xfs file systems on CentOS 4
workstations at our site. We have benefitted greatly from the increased
performance and fast (crash recovery) reboot times that we get from
xfs. We're currently running CentOS kernel 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL and xfs
version 0.2-1.
We have one host where we've got issues. It's a (very) busy imap server
with external scsi hardware
2007 Sep 05
0
xfs 0.4-1 kernel modules CentOS 4/5
Is anyone else having difficulty with the kmod-xfs-*0.4-1* rpms from the
centosplus repositories? For several years I have used a patched anaconda to
get xfs file systems into the initial install for non-root file systems. With
the 0.4-1 rpms, The subsequent reboot immediately reports file system xfs
errors, and the system is unusable. I'm finding this with both CentOS 4 and
CentOS 5.
2006 Nov 08
1
XFS Issues
We are in the process of migrating XFS filesystems from one storage
array to another. Both are arrays are mounted locally on the same
CentOS 4.4 system (x86_64). We are running kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp
along with kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp-0.1-3.
The issue we are having is that while the copy is running (using rsync)
the system will log these message periodically:
kernel: XFS:
2007 Sep 10
0
kmod-drbd-smp (2.6.9-55.0.2.EL) has unknown symbols (kmod-drbd not)
(Sorry for starting a new thread; I could not find the original
message in my mbox.)
Martin Hamant wrote:
> Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> ?crivait:
>> OK ... For the drbd-kmod*.plus kernels, they are now in the CentOSPlus
>> directory / Repository. If you are using CentOSPlus kernel, you need
>> to also get your module for DRBD (or XFS) from there too.
>>
2007 Sep 06
1
CentOS 5 - base kernel vs. centosplus for XFS
I notice that the same versions of kmod-xfs and xfsprogs etc. are in
both the extras and centosplus repositories for centos5.
Is there any particular reason to use the centosplus kernel if what
I'm primarily interested in is XFS filesystem support?
I presume that if I am using the plus kernel, then I must use the plus
versions of kmod-xfs etc., but I'm wondering whether I need the plus
2008 Nov 20
1
XFS or JFS on CentOS 5?
Hi folks... trying to pick between jfs and xfs for a filesystem. In
the past we've used jfs with CentOS + centosplus, however, an older
post indicated that this may not be the best choice as the version of
jfs included with the centosplus kernel would only be as new as the
version that was included in the 2.6.18 kernel as RH doesn't backport
fixes...
It looks like xfs isn't part of
2009 Feb 17
2
Update XFS Documentation (was: Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote:
> The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads:
> "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?"
> The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel.
> Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-)
Very sorry about that. Fixed it now.
In
2007 Oct 11
4
Can't get XFS enabled on Centos 5.0
I anm trying to enable XFS with no success.
I followed the instructions provided in
http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories/CentOSPlus
I installed the new kernel.
Example: 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5.centos.plus
I also installed these packages as described in a post I found
yum install --enablerepo=centosplus xfsprogs xfsprogs-devel
lsmod shows nothing about XFS
I would image there are others out there
2005 Nov 07
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 9, Issue 5
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When
2007 Aug 02
1
kmod-xfs disappear!
hi,
it seems since yesterday the kmod-xfs rpms for the default (non
centosplus kernel) are removed from centos/5/centosplus repositories.
what happens? why did you do so? is there any announcement about it?
thanks.
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"