similar to: [Bug 88822] X freezes after watching videos

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74320 Priority: medium Bug ID: 74320 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Screen freeze with flashplugin-nonfree QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: shuihuzhuan at free.fr

On 02/12/2019 06:10 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hans van Kranenburg, le lun. 11 févr. 2019 22:59:11 +0100, a ecrit: >> On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote: >>> >>> On 2/10/19 12:35 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>>> >>>> Hans van Kranenburg, le sam. 09 févr. 2019 17:01:55 +0100, a ecrit: >>>>>> I have forwarded the original

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Server/General |Driver/nouveau Assignee|xorg-team at lists.x.org |nouveau at lists.freedesktop.o

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #1 from rv <shuihuzhuan at free.fr> --- Created attachment 113329 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=113329&action=edit Log file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #3 from rv <shuihuzhuan at free.fr> --- Is there a possible workaround? How can I help to solve this issue? With those crashes, my computer is getting unusable (losing my work all the time...) Thanks for your help -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part --------------

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #4 from Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- (In reply to rv from comment #3) > Is there a possible workaround? How can I help to solve this issue? With > those crashes, my computer is getting unusable (losing my work all the > time...) > > Thanks for your help nouveau E[ PFIFO][0000:01:00.0] still angry

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #5 from rv <shuihuzhuan at free.fr> --- Thanks, I'll try. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20150211/5bbfadf7/attachment.html>

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #6 from rv <shuihuzhuan at free.fr> --- I've patched kernel 3.19 and had no crash the whole day, yesterday. Thanks. Will it be integrated to kernel 3.20? Or backported to 3.19? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #7 from Keivan <keivan at gmail.com> --- I have the same problem since I updated to 3.18.7-200.fc21.x86_64. It happens frequently and I am only writing code on this computer so basically I have rewritten everything for the past two days. Can someone help me to apply this patch? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #8 from rv <shuihuzhuan at free.fr> --- Created attachment 113695 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=113695&action=edit Patch Here is the one I used -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 --- Comment #9 from K1 <keivan at gmail.com> --- (In reply to rv from comment #8) > Created attachment 113695 [details] [review] > Patch > > Here is the one I used Thanks rv -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88822 Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Pierre Moreau

So instead of using linkagetypes.weak I should use externalweaklinkage ? Le 11 févr. 2014 18:29, "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com> a écrit : > You'd have to use extern_weak linkage. Clang compiles the foo declaration > to: > $ clang -cc1 -emit-llvm -o - t.c | grep declare.*@foo > declare extern_weak i32 @foo(...) #1 > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at

Hmm, Yes Rowland it test also failed. id louis uid=10002(louis) gid=10000(domain users) groups=10000(domain users),27(sudo),10004(servers-ssh),10008(servers-www) louis at mailhopper2:~$ getent passwd louis obell:*:10002:10000:L.P.H. van Belle:/home/users/louis:/bin/bash The difference here is all my users have "Domain users" as primary group. Just like in windows, that the

Hi Lang, That would be great ! :) For now I found a hack which consist of loading a "full of NOP" DLL, use my own DllMemMgr which allocates JIT sections inside the DLL virtual space, backup the memory inside some buffers, unload the DLL, copy the buffer inside the DLL file, create the PDB, reload the DLL file which hopefully in 99% is reloaded at the same virtual address (this allow me

On 3 févr. 2010, at 17:54, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christophe de Dinechin > <christophe at taodyne.com> wrote: >> What guarantees does LLVM try to provide regarding source code compatibility? > > None. And this is a good thing because... ? Christophe

On 2/11/19 2:37 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote: > > On 2/10/19 12:35 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> >> Hans van Kranenburg, le sam. 09 févr. 2019 17:01:55 +0100, a ecrit: >>>> I have forwarded the original mail: all VM I/O get stuck, and thus the >>>> VM becomes unusable. >>> >>> These are in many cases the symptoms of running out of "grant

Hello, Sacha, le ven. 08 févr. 2019 18:00:22 +0100, a ecrit: > On  Debian GNU/Linux 9.7 (stretch) amd64, we have a bug on the last Xen > Hypervisor version: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282 (Read: 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11) > The rollback on the previous package version corrected the problem: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64

Hello, Hans van Kranenburg, le sam. 09 févr. 2019 17:01:55 +0100, a ecrit: > > I have forwarded the original mail: all VM I/O get stuck, and thus the > > VM becomes unusable. > > These are in many cases the symptoms of running out of "grant frames". Oh! That could be it indeed. I'm wondering what could be monopolizing them, though, and why +deb9u11 is affected

On Feb 3, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > On 3 févr. 2010, at 17:54, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Christophe de Dinechin >> <christophe at taodyne.com> wrote: >>> What guarantees does LLVM try to provide regarding source code compatibility? >> >> None. > > And this is a good thing because... ?