similar to: Is loadby file name order not implemented or not working? - want to run tests in file name order, not mtime order

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Is loadby file name order not implemented or not working? - want to run tests in file name order, not mtime order"

2008 Mar 28
1
How to loadby by alphabetical order, not mtime
Hi, I''m writing my requirements in rspec, however, I can not figure out a way to execute all specs according to alphabetical order, not by last modified time. According to the documentation, it seems like the default is by alphabetical order, I just can not get that to work. In the unit tests with the rspec package, seems like only mtime was tested. Can anyone tell me how to run specs
2007 May 29
4
rspec and autotest (was: questions rspec on rails)
Do have the latest versions? RSpec-1.0.3 ZenTest-3.6.0 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jonathan Linowes <jonathan at parkerhill.com> Date: May 29, 2007 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [rspec-users] questions rspec on rails To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org> Hi, I should have mentioned I already did that. Here''s my spec.opts file --colour --format progress
2007 Aug 18
6
RSpec: "--color" not working in spec.opts when combined with "--drb"
Windows XP SP 2 ruby 1.8.5 gems: rails 1.2.3 rake 0.7.3 win32console 1.0.8 plugins: rspec 1.0.8 rspec_rails 1.0.8 spec.opts: --colour --format progress --loadby mtime --reverse --drb When I run "rake spec" or "ruby script/spec spec --color" this is the output: D:\dev\project>rake spec (in D:/dev/project)
2007 Aug 08
3
rspec with autotest on a windows machine
Hello all, I''m new to rSpec but after reading a couple of tutorials I''ve become enamored. Anyway, I am at minute 42 of the rSpec basics screencast ( peepcode.com) and I''m having the following error running autotest w/rSpec: D:\ruby\projects\forecaster>autotest loading autotest/rails_rspec c:\ruby\bin\ruby -rrubygems -e "require ''redgreen''"
2015 Sep 08
0
mtime vs ctime
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would need to see both your existing rsync command line and the output of --itemize-changes when such an occurrence happens before I can really understand what is happening. In the end, if you have any output at all the bare minimum should be - --itemize-changes. --verbose is utterly useless without it. On 09/07/2015 11:10 PM, Andrej wrote: >
2015 Sep 08
2
mtime vs ctime
On 8 September 2015 at 13:57, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: Hi Kevin. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The ctime will always be newer or the same as the mtime. This is > because changing the mtime also changes the ctime as does other things > like changing the permissions. > > Rsync only pays attention to the mtime because rsync can
2015 Sep 08
0
mtime vs ctime
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The ctime will always be newer or the same as the mtime. This is because changing the mtime also changes the ctime as does other things like changing the permissions. Rsync only pays attention to the mtime because rsync can set a specific mtime (--times) but setting a specific ctime is impossible as it would violate the basic *nix security model.
2015 May 18
1
mtime not updating on remote directory
Hello, I'm using rsync as part of a centralised config management for several servers. I'm trying to monitor the mtime of a particular directory and confirm that the remote copies are approximately as new as the the local master. However, mtime on that directory is not being synced. Here's my rsync command: cd $confdir && rsync -avpzR --checksum -I -e "ssh"
2009 Jul 27
3
mtime handling seems generally buggy for directories
Hello again, as stated earlier there is a problem with mtime setting on directories during healing in replication setup. Today I tested 2.0.5 and found out that the handling is more or less generally buggy for directory mtimes. Simply try this: untar some kernel archive on your local disk and look at the mtime of the created top directory. now untar the same archive on an exported gluster fs and
2008 Aug 29
1
maildir, zlib and mtime/internal date
On the wiki: http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib I think there should be a step 5.0. along the lines of "get and remember the original message file's mtime" And a step 5.4 like "Using the touch command or some other method, set the now compressed message's mtime back to the mtime of the original message file." To preserve the message's internal time in case
2008 Nov 02
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5867] New: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5867 Summary: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: samba@byshenk.net
2018 Apr 24
1
dovecot vs. mutt: no full index sync on Maildir new/ mtime change
Hi, everyone! This is a follow-up to "Looks like a bug to me: Dovecot ignores Maildir/new timestamp" from Fredrik Roubert on 01.12.2015: https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2015-December/102585.html I've run into the same problem as Fredrik: When manipulating my Maildir locally with mutt, deleting a message from new/ doesn't cause a full update of the index. Therefore, IMAP
2012 Oct 25
1
find with -mtime and -print0 = inaccurate results
If I run this: find /path/to/files/ -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz I get the expected results, files with modify time less than two days old. But, if I run it like this, with the print0 flag: find /path/to/files/ -print0 -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz I get older files included as well. Anyone know why?
2006 Nov 10
1
rsync 2.6.9 on OS X. files with xattrs don't retain mtime.
I'm really excited about the recent work on extended attributes. I've compiled 2.6.9 with xattr support, and run a few tests. It seems that if I have a file with an extended attribute ( a resource fork in this case), and I run rsync -aX , the mtime is not preserved. Example: stat xattrsrc/a 234881026 2894399 -rw------- 1 admin staff 0 1048576 "Nov 10 10:03:01 2006" "Nov
2002 Nov 24
1
rsync and the file's mtime
I'm trying to write a script that runs rsync to pull files and then detect which ones of them have changed. The problem is when I run rsync without the -t flag the mtime gets updated every run, not only when the file changes. It this a bug, by design, or un-avoidable? My plan was to use the -N bash file test operator to check to see if the file had been accessed since it have been
2008 Jul 03
0
Error on Autotest start
I have been using autotest/zentest 3.5.0 with my rails 2.0.2 and rspec. I upgraded my gems and got 3.9.3 and had a problem. I went back to 3.5.0 and it worked. I stayed there until moving to rails 2.1. I again updated my gems and got 3.10. This one had the same problem. This time I need to figure out what is wrong. Here is what I get:
2023 Aug 05
0
mtime truncated when queried by client
samba on Raspberry pi 4b - Linux 6.1.41-v8+ aarch64 GNU/Linux if I do a mtime on the file that gets shared I see this Modify: 2020-10-22 09:02:16.991364753 -0400 when I do a mtime on the same file on the client (Linux) I see this Modify: 2020-10-22 09:02:16.991364700 -0400 Is not a big deal it just caused some rsync confusion that was addressed by using --modify-window=1 Is this by design
2007 Nov 11
4
dovecot.index mtime
Is there anyway I can get Dovecot to update mtime on dovecot.index everytime a user successfully checks there email? Or perhaps there is a better way to do what I want here. I am working on a script that I want to check when the last time a user checked there email account. If a user has not checked it in say 6 months I want to automatically suspend the account through the MTA. If they start
2009 Apr 02
4
Maildir files with mtime in the future
If Maildir storage is used, the mtime of a given Maildir file is set to the message's INTERNALDATE. Now, when a client APPENDs a message to an IMAP mailbox, the client may optionally specify the INTERNALDATE: | If a date-time is specified, the internal date SHOULD be set in the | resulting message; otherwise, the internal date of the resulting | message is set to the current date and time by
2015 Oct 17
2
Order in which UIDs are assigned..
Hi, I just want some clarification on how Dovecot's IMAP assigns UIDs when it picks files from the "new" directory of a Maildir. What I am observing is that only ctime has a role to play in it. For example if there are two files in "new", a.msg & z.msg. Even when a.msg has lower mtime than z.msg and "a" comes before "z" alphabetically, dovecot