similar to: [PATCH 0/6] nouveau/gk20a: RAM device removal & IOMMU support

Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to, and can trick

Changes since v3: - Use a single dma_attr for all DMA-API allocations in instmem instead of one per allocation - Use device.info.ram_size instead of pfb->ram to check whether VRAM is present outside of nvkm Changes since v2: - Cleaner changes for ltc - Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into

Thanks Ilia for the v2 review! Here is the v3 of this IOMMU support for GK20A series. Changes since v2: - Cleaner changes for ltc - Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > instmem for GK20A is allocated using dma_alloc_coherent(), which > provides us with a coherent CPU mapping that we never use because > instmem objects are accessed through PRAMIN. Switch to > dma_alloc_attrs() which gives us the option to dismiss that CPU mapping > and free up some CPU virtual

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > Instead of hard-coding the translation bit in subdev driver, we refer to > the platform data. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Hi, Generally the the imported buffers which has memory type TTM_PL_TT are mapped as small pages probably due to lack of big page allocation. But the platform device which also use memory type TTM_PL_TT, like GK20A, can *allocate* big page though the IOMMU hardware inside the SoC. This is a try to map the imported buffers as big pages in GMMU by the platform IOMMU. With some preparation work to

GK20A does not have dedicated RAM, thus having a RAM device for it does not make sense. Move the contiguous physical memory allocation to instmem. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/instmem.h | 1 + drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/gk104.c | 2 +- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgk20a.c | 86 +-----------

Let GK20A's instmem take advantage of the IOMMU if it is present. Having an IOMMU means that instmem is no longer allocated using the DMA API, but instead obtained through page_alloc and made contiguous to the GPU by IOMMU mappings. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/gk20a.c | 272 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file

Commit 69c4938249fb ("drm/nouveau/instmem/gk20a: use direct CPU access") tried to be smart while using the DMA-API by managing the CPU mappings of buffers allocated with the DMA-API by itself. In doing so, it relied on dma_to_phys() which is an architecture-private function not available everywhere. This broke the build on several architectures. Since there is no reliable and portable

Second version of this patchset. Not many changes since first version - I hope this means the changes are not too controversial. Changes since v1: - Removed lookup for previous FW files in "nouveau/" - Went back to using request_firmware() since we only try to load one file Original cover letter follows: GM20B is the GPU of the upcoming Tegra X1 SoC. This series adds initial support

Hello everyone, GM20B is the GPU of the upcoming Tegra X1 SoC. This series adds initial support for it, based on a rework of the already-supported GK20A. It also introduces support for NVIDIA-provided firmware files, which is why I have added a few NVIDIA people who are relevant to this discussion. The first patch adds support for loading the FECS and GPCCS firmwares from firmware files

If a memory allocation fails when using the DMA allocator, gk20a_instobj_dtor_dma() will be called on the failed instmem object. At this time, node->handle might not be NULL despite the call to dma_alloc_attrs() having failed. node->cpuaddr is the right member to check for such a failure, so use it instead. Reported-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > This is a workaround to avoid the instmem backup/restore during the suspend > and resume process in nv50 instemem driver. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > drm/Kbuild | 1 + > nvkm/engine/device/nve0.c | 2 +- >

Changes since last sent: * add a patch to set the device into DRM_SWITCH_POWER_CHANGING state (can be dropped actually, I thought I was needing it, came up with a different approach and forgot to delete it, doesn't hurt though) * expose information about runtime suspending to nvkm so that we can run the pcie workaround only on runtime suspend Karol Herbst (8): pci: disable ASPM

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Commit 12c9b05da918 ("drm/nouveau/imem: support allocations not preserved across suspend") uses container_of() to cast from struct nvkm_memory to struct nvkm_instobj, assuming that all instance objects are derived from struct nvkm_instobj. For the gk20a family that's not the case and they are derived from struct nvkm_memory instead.

User-space use mappable BOs notably for fences, and expects that a value update by the GPU will be immediatly visible through the user-space mapping. ARM has a property that may prevent this from happening though: memory can be mapped multiple times only if the different mappings share the same caching properties. However all the lowmem memory is already identity-mapped into the kernel with cache

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> The purpose of BAR1 is primarily to make memory accesses coherent. However, some GPUs do not have BAR1 functionality. For example, the GV11B found on the Xavier SoC is DMA coherent and therefore doesn't need BAR1. Implement a variant of FIFO channels that work without a mapping of instance memory through BAR1. XXX ensure memory barriers are

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> The gk20a implementation of instance memory uses vmap()/vunmap() to map memory regions into the kernel's virtual address space. These functions may sleep, so protecting them by a spin lock is not safe. This triggers a warning if the DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP Kconfig option is enabled. Fix this by using a mutex instead. Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have > no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far > works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for > the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. > > This patch

Some newer chips have trouble coming up, and we get bad MMIO reads from them, like 0xbadf100. This ends up translating into crazy amounts of VRAM, which destroys all sorts of other logic down the line. Instead, fail device init. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Cc: stable at kernel.org --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)