similar to: drm/nouveau: dont switch vt on suspend

Commit 1dce6264045cd23e9c07574ed0bb31c7dce9354f introduced a regression spotted on several G94 (FDObz #85160). This device seems to expect the vblank period to be set after setting scale instead of before. V2: shove this in a separate function This is a candidate bug-fix for 3.18 Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> Tested-by: Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic at bitsync.net>

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: >> Commit 1dce6264045cd23e9c07574ed0bb31c7dce9354f introduced a regression spotted >> on several G94 (FDObz #85160). This device seems to expect the vblank period to > > I believe that's often done as a >

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > Solves blinking on reclocking memory. The value set is an underestimate, but with non-reduced vblanking this should give us plenty of time Hey Roy, I've merged all (squashed the kepler change into the commit where it's needed too) except this patch, which needs to be rebased on top of 3.17-rc.

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Patch 1 and 2 implement wait-for-vblank, required to remove flicker when reclocking memory Patch 3 and 4 allow me to do things between waiting for VBLANK and disabling FB, like pause PFIFO and wait for the engines to idle. This minimises the time PFIFO is paused, thus maximises performance. The rest of the patches speak for themselves. As the actual memory reclocking script is still somewhat prone

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 and 3 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest is

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

Patch 1 fixes nva3 bailing due to not finding the right ramcfg Patch 2 is a resend rebased on 3.17.0-rc4 for setting the vblank period Patch 3-5 handle writes to per-partition registers, for which NVA3 does not have special broadcast regs available. Patch 6 removes local structs from NVA3 reclocking in favour of the already existing "ram->base." variables, like in NVE0 As always,

From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> Commit de7b7d59d54852c introduced tiled GART, but a linear copy is still performed. This may result in errors on eviction, fix it by checking tiling from memtype. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #3.10+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 33

Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > Commit 1dce6264045cd23e9c07574ed0bb31c7dce9354f introduced a regression spotted > on several G94 (FDObz #85160). This device seems to expect the vblank period to I believe that's often done as a Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/bla annotation > be set after setting scale instead of before.

--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> Datum: 00:52:05 31-10-2014 An: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Betreff: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] nv50/disp: Fix modeset on G94 > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> >

Hi, Here is my patch queue I accumulated over quite a long time. Patches 1-6 are bugfixes, and rest is mostly RFC. Comments are welcome. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky

This patch set replaces the occurrences of drm_*_reference() and drm_*_unreference() with the new drm_*_get() and drm_*_put() functions. All patches in the series do the same thing, converting to the new APIs. I created patches per DRM driver as suggested by Daniel Vetter. Background: In the kernel, reference counting APIs use *_get(), *_put() style naming to reference-count the objects. But DRM

This patch set replaces functions named {un,reference} by their {put,get} counterparts. Affected data types are struct drm_connector, struct drm_framebuffer, struct drm_gem_object, and struct drm_device. With the reference-counting functions being named {put,get}, the DRM interface is more aligned to Linux kernel nameing standard. The patch set does not change driver-internal interfaces. Thomas

Hi! While trying to get CLUT support for the atmel_hlcdc driver, and specifically for the emulated fbdev interface, I received some push-back that my feeble in-driver attempts should be solved by the core. This is my attempt to do it right. I have obviously not tested all of this with more than a compile, but patches 1 through 5 are enough to make the atmel-hlcdc driver do what I need. The rest