similar to: 3.19.0-rc1 nouvea build failure on GeForce GT 610 only

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "3.19.0-rc1 nouvea build failure on GeForce GT 610 only"

2014 Dec 22
1
3.19.0-rc1 nouvea build failure on GeForce GT 610 only
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:37 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 13:01 +0000, Sid Boyce wrote: > > CHK kernel/config_data.h > > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.o > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.c: In function > > ‘nvd0_dmaobj_bind’: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.c:54:8: error:
2014 Dec 22
0
3.19.0-rc1 nouvea build failure on GeForce GT 610 only
Hi Sid, On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 13:01 +0000, Sid Boyce wrote: > CHK kernel/config_data.h > CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.o > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.c: In function > ‘nvd0_dmaobj_bind’: > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.c:54:8: error: > ‘GM204_DISP_CORE_CHANNEL_DMA’ undeclared (first use in this
2014 Dec 22
0
3.19.0-rc1 nouvea build failure on GeForce GT 610 only
On 22/12/14 13:54, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:37 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 13:01 +0000, Sid Boyce wrote: >>> CHK kernel/config_data.h >>> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.o >>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/dmaobj/nvd0.c: In function >>> ‘nvd0_dmaobj_bind’:
2014 Feb 15
3
[RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: split off nvc0 compilation
So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to, NVC0 is the least relevant card -- people with sub-1GB of RAM, older hardware. With my config options
2014 Feb 15
0
[RFC PATCH] drm/nouveau: split off nvc0 compilation
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > So... I was wondering what the impact of splitting up the card compilation by > e.g. generation would be. Depending on the split things would get fairly > intertwined, so I thought I'd start small. This just splits NVC0 from > everything else. I figure that for the people this matters the most to,
2016 Dec 20
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dma: use rb_entry()
To make the code clearer, use rb_entry() instead of container_of() to deal with rbtree. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/base.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/base.c index f11ebdd..4655d17 100644
2014 Mar 23
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: allow nv04/nv50/nvc0+ parts of the driver to be separated
This will allow the nouveau module to only include support for nv04-nv50, nv50-nvc0, nvc0+ cards individually (or in any combination). Only compiling one of the card types at a time reduces the size of the nouveau module, from 1.3M to 700-800K, depending on the type (including symbols/etc). It should also yield a reduction in compile time as a lot fewer files are compiled. Here are the sizes
2013 Aug 31
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/therm: ack any pending IRQ at init v2
From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe regarding to runtime reconfiguration. v2: - do not limit this patch to nv84-a3 and make it nv84+ Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> ---
2013 Sep 08
3
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/therm: ack any pending IRQ at init
From: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe regarding to runtime reconfiguration. v2: - do not limit this patch to nv84-a3 and make it nv84+ v3: - move the ack to fini() - disable IRQs on fini() - silently ignore un-requested IRQs
2013 Jul 23
4
[PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: fix vblank interrupt being called before event is setup
Sort of fixes mmiotrace for me again, I could sear I sent a similar patch before the rework to event interface, so I guess it got reintroduced. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c index 7e3875d..35e526b 100644 ---
2014 May 04
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dp: restore DP suspend/resume functionality
The following commit from about a year ago removed nouveau_dp_dpms() which did steps required to suspend and resume a monitor connected via DisplayPort. commit 0a0afd282fd715dd63d64b243299a64da14f8e8d Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Mon Feb 18 23:17:53 2013 -0500 drm/nv50-/disp: move DP link training to core and train from supervisor My computer with
2014 May 05
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/dp: restore DP suspend/resume functionality
On 5 May 2014 01:43, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Sergei Antonov <saproj at gmail.com> wrote: >> The following commit from about a year ago removed nouveau_dp_dpms() which >> did steps required to suspend and resume a monitor connected via DisplayPort. >> >> commit 0a0afd282fd715dd63d64b243299a64da14f8e8d
2013 Aug 23
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/i2c: pass the function pointers in at creation time
i2c_bit_add_bus can call the pre_xfer function, which expects the func pointer to be set. Pass in func to the port creation logic so that it is set before i2c_bit_add_bus. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68456 Reported-by: Hans-Peter Deifel <hpdeifel at gmx.de> Tested-by: Hans-Peter Deifel <hpdeifel at gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at
2014 Sep 08
1
[PATCH] gpio: rename g92 class to g94
nv92 hardware has only 16 interrupt lines, while nv94 and later has 32. Accessing 0xe0c{0,4} registers on nv92 can lead to incorrect PDISP setup. This is a regression introduced with commit 9d0f5ec9ee0fd5dc5fc1cc2cf559286431e406e3 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Mon May 12 15:22:42 2014 +1000 gpio: split g92 class from nv50 Reported-by: estece on #nouveau Cc: stable
2012 Jun 01
20
[Bug 50571] New: nouveau crashes with GeForce GT 520
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 Bug #: 50571 Summary: nouveau crashes with GeForce GT 520 Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:
2014 Apr 01
3
CH7007A (AKA CH7006) TV OUT Support for NV11 (NVidia GeForce2 Go Dell I8K Laptop)
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:53:02PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >I believe that ch7006 is the only external encoder that's supposed to >work, so you're in luck. It sounds like it passes the nv04_tv_identify >stage of nv04_tv_create -- perhaps it fails later? Although based on >the prints, it's even doing dpms stuff (but it hits _detect a second >time... odd). Try
2014 Mar 19
1
[PATCH v2] disp/nvd0-: allow 540MHz data rate for nvd0+ devices
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76319 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- It's unclear to me whether GF11x devices actually support this, but the disp "split" is at nvd0, so I went with that. The marketing docs are fairly unclear. However most of them don't actually have DP in the first place, so it may not be a huge issue. I
2014 Apr 02
1
CH7007A (AKA CH7006) TV OUT Support for NV11 (NVidia GeForce2 Go Dell I8K Laptop)
After analyzing verbose nouveau & drm dmesg, I have found seemingly no more useful details pertaining to having no TV-1 device. The TV-1 device might be getting lost within DRM, by setting the TV-1 (SVIDEO, Composite) device into DPMS mode or Full Power Down mode, and the ch7006 datasheet does say in this mode, all but the i2c circuits are disabled! Looking at
2014 Jun 17
1
[REGRESSION] drm/g94/i2c: add aux channel interrupt driver
Hey, This patch causes a regression on my display-less nvd7. Commenting out the aux, aux_stat and aux_mask members in nvd0_i2c_oclass fixes boot, and makes things work normally again. broken dmesg: [ 40.314470] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM: Argument #4 type mismatch - Found [Buffer], ACPI requires [Package] (20140424/nsarguments-95) [ 40.314729] ACPI Warning: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DSM:
2013 Oct 17
5
[Bug 70566] New: NVD0 card hard lock-ups entire system at random moments
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70566 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70566 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: NVD0 card hard lock-ups entire system at random moments QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All