similar to: [PATCH 0/3] nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/3] nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains"

2014 Nov 19
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains
This series is to allow NVIDIA chips with shared memory to operate more efficiently (and to operate at all once we disable VRAM from the kernel driver) by allowing nouveau_screen to specify a domain to use for objects originally allocated into VRAM. If the domain is not overridden, the default NOUVEAU_BO_VRAM is used. A NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro is then introduced to be used in place of
2015 Jun 19
5
[PATCH v3 0/2] nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains
New revision of this patchset that prevents VRAM objects from being allocated on VRAM-less systems like Tegra. This is required for Mesa to work on such systems. Changes since v2: - Use vram_size to detect systems without VRAM and set the correct domain instead of expecting each chip to set its domain explicitly. Alexandre Courbot (2): nouveau: support for custom VRAM domains nvc0: use
2014 Nov 19
1
[PATCH v2 2/3] nvc0: use NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Use the newly-introduced NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro to support alternative > VRAM domains for chips that do not use dedicated video memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- > src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 6 ++---- >
2014 Jun 17
2
[PATCH try 2 1/2] gallium/nouveau: decouple nouveau_fence implementation from screen
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 76 ++++++++++++------------- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 22 +++++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 9 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 14 ++--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.c | 4 +-
2014 Jun 16
2
[PATCH 1/2] gallium/nouveau: decouple nouveau_fence implementation from screen
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 76 ++++++++++++------------- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 22 +++++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 9 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 14 ++--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.c | 4
2014 Oct 29
3
[PATCH 3/3] gk20a: use NOUVEAU_BO_GART as VRAM domain
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > GK20A does not have dedicated VRAM, therefore allocating in VRAM can be > sub-optimal and sometimes even harmful. Set its VRAM domain to > NOUVEAU_BO_GART so all objects are allocated in system memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- >
2015 Dec 02
3
NV50 compute support questions
On 01-12-15, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >>> Ok, here is a MMT trace of vectorAdd: >>> >>> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/vectorAdd.log.gz >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> Thanks a lot. > > Well, I didn't know but Martin has a GK208... > I just tested the compute support on his card and ... it works without > any changes. :-)
2015 Mar 14
1
[PATCH ddx] Add support for VRAM-less devices to the ddx
With this patch the DDX almost works with GK20A, the missing piece is adding COHERENT mappings to the right places. ;-) If you specify NOUVEAU_BO_APER the kernel will truncate valid_domains to the domains specified at creation time. This means that as long as we only specify the correct domain in nouveau_allocate_surface the effect is still the same. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <dev at
2015 Nov 26
9
[mesa 1/9] nouveau: bump required libdrm version to 2.4.66
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 4016871..c02ee61 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED=2.4.56 LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED=2.4.63 LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED=2.4.61
2013 Aug 11
10
[PATCH 00/10] Add support for MPEG2 and VC-1 on VP3/VP4 for NV98-NVAF
As it turns out, with the proprietary firmware, the VP3 and VP4 interfaces are identical. Furthermore, this is all already implemented for nvc0. So these patches (a) move the easily sharable bits of the nvc0 implementation into the nouveau directory, and then (b) implement the other parts in nv50. The non-shared parts are still largely copies, but there are some differences, not the least of which
2015 Dec 16
11
[mesa v3 1/9] nouveau: bump required libdrm version to 2.4.66
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> v2. forgot bump for non-gallium driver Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- configure.ac | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index b6680d0..965c6f7 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ LIBDRM_REQUIRED=2.4.60
2014 Apr 30
1
[PATCH 1/2] nouveau: remove cb_dirty, it's never used
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 4 +--- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_context.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c index e308ff4..904e2cc 100644 ---
2014 Nov 19
1
[PATCH v2 2/3] nvc0: use NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro
Hello Alex, Op 19-11-14 om 06:41 schreef Alexandre Courbot: > Use the newly-introduced NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro to support alternative > VRAM domains for chips that do not use dedicated video memory. Should we construct a similar patch for NVAA/NVAC (MCP7x) as well? > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> > --- >
2015 May 17
14
[PATCH 00/12] Tessellation support for nvc0
This is enough to enable tessellation support on nvc0. It seems to work a lot better on my GF108 than GK208. I suspect that there's some sort of scheduling shenanigans that need to be adjusted for kepler+. Or perhaps some shader header things. Even with the GF108, I still get occasional blue triangles in Heaven, but I get a *ton* of them on the GK208 -- seemingly the same issue, but it's
2015 Nov 27
13
[mesa v2 1/9] nouveau: bump required libdrm version to 2.4.66
From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 4016871..c02ee61 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ LIBDRM_RADEON_REQUIRED=2.4.56 LIBDRM_AMDGPU_REQUIRED=2.4.63 LIBDRM_INTEL_REQUIRED=2.4.61
2014 Nov 19
0
[PATCH v2 2/3] nvc0: use NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro
Use the newly-introduced NV_VRAM_DOMAIN() macro to support alternative VRAM domains for chips that do not use dedicated video memory. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_buffer.c | 6 ++---- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_miptree.c | 4 ++-- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_compute.c | 2 +-
2014 Jul 10
3
[PATCH 0/3] nvc0: ARB_(multi_)draw_indirect support
The main patches are from Christoph. Unfortunately they're a little beyond my understanding of all the vertex-related details, but they generally seemed fine. I'm just going to push these unless someone steps up to review them. Christoph Bumiller (2): nvc0: add support for indirect drawing nvc0: fix translate path for PRIM_RESTART_WITH_DRAW_ARRAYS Ilia Mirkin (1): nouveau: check if
2015 Nov 20
2
NV50 compute support questions
Hi, On 20-11-15 17:07, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 11/20/2015 11:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Samual, et al, > > Hi Hans, > >> >> In >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau?id=ff72440b40211326eda118232fabd53965410afd >> >> you write: "This compute support has been tested by >> Pierre
2015 Dec 04
4
NV50 compute support questions
Hi, On 02-12-15 19:33, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 12/02/2015 04:34 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 01-12-15, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >>> Ok, here is a MMT trace of vectorAdd: >> >>> >> >>> https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/vectorAdd.log.gz >> >> >> >> Hi Hans, >> >> >>
2009 Dec 30
4
[PATCH 1/3] nv50: remove vtxbuf stateobject after a referenced vtxbuf is mapped
- This avoids problematic "reloc'ed while mapped" messages and some associated corruption as well. Signed-off-by: Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_screen.h | 3 +++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nouveau_stateobj.h | 13 +++++++++++++