Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v5 0/4] drm: nouveau: memory coherency on ARM"
2014 Jul 08
8
[PATCH v4 0/6] drm: nouveau: memory coherency on ARM
Another revision of this patchset critical for GK20A to operate.
Previous attempts were exclusively using either TTM's regular page allocator or
the DMA API one. Both have their advantages and drawbacks: the page allocator is
fast but requires explicit synchronization on non-coherent architectures,
whereas the DMA allocator always returns coherent memory, but is also slower,
creates a
2014 Jul 10
2
[PATCH v4 4/6] drm/nouveau: synchronize BOs when required
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:25:59PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On architectures for which access to GPU memory is non-coherent,
> caches need to be flushed and invalidated explicitly when BO control
> changes between CPU and GPU.
>
> This patch adds buffer synchronization functions which invokes the
> correct API (PCI or DMA) to ensure synchronization is effective.
>
2014 Jul 11
1
[PATCH v4 4/6] drm/nouveau: synchronize BOs when required
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:40:27AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 10:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 05:25:59PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>On architectures for which access to GPU memory is non-coherent,
> >>caches need to be flushed and invalidated explicitly when BO control
> >>changes between CPU and GPU.
>
2016 Jul 13
1
[PATCH 1/2] ttm: remove special handling of coherent objects
TTM-allocated coherent objects were populated using the DMA API and
accessed using the mapping it returned to workaround coherency
issues. These issues seem to have been solved, thus remove this extra
case to handle and use the regular kernel mapping functions.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com>
---
drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 61
2014 May 19
8
[PATCH 0/4] drm/ttm: nouveau: memory coherency fixes for ARM
This small series introduces TTM helper functions as well as Nouveau hooks that
are needed to ensure buffer coherency on ARM. Most of this series is a
forward-port of some patches Lucas Stach sent last year and that are also
needed for Nouveau GK20A support:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2013-August/014026.html
Another patch takes care of flushing the CPU write-buffer when
2013 Aug 28
11
[PATCH 0/6] Nouveau on ARM fixes
This is the first set of patches to make Nouveau work
on Tegra. Those are only the obvious correctness fixes,
a lot of optimization work remains to be done, but at least
it's enough to get accel working and let the machine survive
a piglit run.
A new BO flag is introduced to allow userspace to hint the
kernel about possible optimizations.
Lucas Stach (6):
drm/ttm: recognize ARM arch in
2014 Jun 24
4
[PATCH v2 0/3] drm/ttm: nouveau: memory coherency for ARM
For this v2 I have fixed the patches that are non-controversial (all Lucas' :))
and am resubmitting them in the hope that they will get merged. This will
just leave the issue of Nouveau system-memory buffers mapping to be solved.
This issue is quite complex, so let me summarize the situation and the data
I have at hand. ARM caching is like a quantum world where Murphy's law
constantly
2016 Sep 18
5
[PATCH 1/2] Revert "bus: remove cpu_coherent flag"
This reverts commit 01bbcb69f80e1058395b737ae399c6f4ef48691b.
The commit caused fence timeouts within nvc0_screen_destroy and most likely
other places as well.
The most obvious effect is, that userspace processes take minutes to actually
quit.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com>
---
drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/device.h | 1 +
drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c |
2013 Jul 12
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: kill nouveau_ttm_fault_reserve_notify handler to prevent useless buffer moves
I have no idea what this bogus restriction on placement is, but it breaks decoding 1080p
VDPAU at boot speed. With this patch applied I only need to bump the vdec clock to
get real-time 1080p decoding. It prevents a lot of VRAM <-> VRAM buffer moves.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
2020 Jan 24
4
TTM/Nouveau cleanups
Hi guys,
I've already send this out in September last year, but only got a response from Daniel.
Could you guys please test this and tell me what you think about it?
Basically I'm trying to remove all driver specific features from TTM which don't need to be inside the framework.
Thanks,
Christian.
2020 Aug 21
5
Moving LRU handling into Nouveau v3
Hi guys,
so I got some hardware and tested this and after hammering out tons of typos it now seems to work fine.
Could you give it more testing?
Thanks in advance,
Christian
2019 Nov 20
2
Move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver
Just a gentle ping on this.
Already got the Acked-by from Daniel, but I need some of the
nouveau guys to test this since I can only compile test it.
Regards,
Christian.
2019 Sep 30
3
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: move io_reserve_lru handling into the driver
While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by
Nouveau is actually not working at all.
In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory
management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau
instead.
The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile tested!
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at
2014 May 19
3
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: introduce CPU cache flushing macro
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:10:58PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Some architectures (e.g. ARM) need the CPU buffers to be explicitely
> flushed for a memory write to take effect. Not doing so results in
> synchronization issues, especially after writing to BOs.
It seems to me that the above is generally true for all architectures,
not just ARM.
Also: s/explicitely/explicitly/
>
2014 Jul 08
0
[PATCH v4 4/6] drm/nouveau: synchronize BOs when required
On architectures for which access to GPU memory is non-coherent,
caches need to be flushed and invalidated explicitly when BO control
changes between CPU and GPU.
This patch adds buffer synchronization functions which invokes the
correct API (PCI or DMA) to ensure synchronization is effective.
Based on the TTM DMA cache helper patches by Lucas Stach.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev at
2020 Sep 01
4
[PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: make sure that we always zero init mem.bus v2
We are trying to remove the io_lru handling and depend
on zero init base, offset and addr here.
v2: init addr as well
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index e3931e515906..772c640a6046 100644
---
2018 Feb 27
4
[PATCH 4/5] drm/ttm: add ttm_sg_tt_init
Hi guys,
at least on amdgpu and radeon the page array allocated by
ttm_dma_tt_init is completely unused in the case of DMA-buf sharing. So
I'm trying to get rid of that by only allocating the DMA address array.
Now the only other user of DMA-buf together with ttm_dma_tt_init is
Nouveau. So my question is are you guys using the page array anywhere in
your kernel driver in case of a
2013 Nov 12
6
[PATCH 1/7] drm/nouveau: fix m2mf copy to tiled gart
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
Commit de7b7d59d54852c introduced tiled GART, but a linear copy is
still performed. This may result in errors on eviction, fix it by
checking tiling from memtype.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #3.10+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 33
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH 3/6] drm/nouveau: hook up cache sync functions
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:00:47AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev at lynxeye.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index
2014 Jun 09
2
[PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: introduce CPU cache flushing macro
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, den 19.05.2014, 11:02 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:10:58PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> > Some architectures (e.g. ARM) need the CPU buffers to be explicitely
>> > flushed for a memory write to take effect. Not doing so results in