similar to: [OT] JOB - AMD drivers

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:11 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > On 10/30/13 03:17 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com<mailto: >> cbergstrom at pathscale.**com <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>>> wrote: >> >> On 10/29/13 07:27 AM,

On 10/30/13 03:17 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > On 10/29/13 07:27 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:07 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > On 10/29/13 07:27 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com<mailto: >> cbergstrom at pathscale.**com <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>>> wrote: >> >> fuzzy://How much

On 06/11/14 08:39 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com > <mailto:kremenek at apple.com>> wrote: > > On Jun 10, 2014, at 5:36 PM, C. Bergström > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > > On 06/11/14 06:58 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote: >

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 08:13:28PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:11 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:07 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Ben

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:07 PM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 8 July 2015 at 09:53, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >>>> regarding >>>>

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:31 PM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:02 AM C Bergström

Chandler has it right. Our intent is to upstream everything. The MS fork will be used as a staging area for LLVM changes as we work to get them upstreamed. Tactically we're merging the MS fork everyday with mainline to try and stay close. We're still ramping up right now, and trying to figure out how best to work day to day, but our over arching goal is to enable (mainline) LLVM to be

On 10/29/13 07:27 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:06 PM, "C. Bergström" > <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote: > > fuzzy://How much "heads up" > > > One full release cycle, so approximately 6 months before a release If it's 3-6 months from *today* before something hits clang

On Dec 15, 2013, at 7:10 PM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 12/16/13 09:57 AM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Dec 12, 2013, at 11:08 PM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12/13/13 01:58 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >>>> That’s a long laundry list of bugs there. It would be great to have them fixed, but the

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:43 PM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:31 PM C Bergström

On 04/11/15 09:08, cbergstrom at pathscale.com wrote: > Is anyone actually and or actively working on this? > Github.com/pathscale/pscnv is totally bitrot but waaay more portable > base. Nouveau made hard Linux assumptions that will be difficult to > overcome afaik. As pointed out by Ilia, this is not true anymore. Nouveau can also partially run in the userspace, the hard

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 July 2015 at 09:53, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> regarding >> -------- >> Fixed address allocations weren't going to be part of that, but I see >> that it makes sense for a variety of use cases. One question I have >> here is how this is intended

The LLILC project does not require direct interaction with the PDB, so it’s not part of our plans. The JIT uses a special reporting format to communicate debug info (frame info and machine->IL mappings) back to the CoreCLR EE. The debugger joins this with the frontend-produced debug information (IL->source and logical frame offset->local, which is in a PDB) to complete the picture.

I won't disagree about a level of professionalism or what the community does or doesn't need. However, I'd say that pragmatically if profanity was an issue in the workplace, for a large development community, that LKML would have run afoul a long time ago. My view - I'm only replying because the reality is that in the workplace sometimes a full lexicon of words are spoken. I

On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:02 AM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Christos Margiolas >> <chrmargiolas at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Thank you a lot for the feedback. I believe

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:41 AM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > To: "C Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> > > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > Sent: Thursday, May 5,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info> > To: "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> > Cc: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 3:24:38 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev]

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:42 AM, C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF should be exactly that, but as I think > someone else indicated there's a bit of work for it to actually be > what it advertises to be. Mehdi wrote it's correct for all of the listed dynlibs to be installed. > This could get gray when you consider that you really

I am also interested. Best, Andrew On Tuesday, 26 July 2016, 20:36, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: Message: 6 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:12:48 +0800 From: Raymond Tay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> To: C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, clang developer list <cfe-dev at