similar to: [PATCH 1/2] fb: default NvMemExec to on, turning it off is used for debugging only

Adds a NvReclock boolean option to allow the user to enable (or disable) reclocking. All chipsets default to off, except NVAA/NVAC, which are reportedly complete. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Ben, I know you've been saying that reclocking is in a pretty bad state, but I do think that there are going to be groups of people for whom the current code can work

Second version of the gk20a clock patches. I have tried to keep the therm and volt devices mandatory in the clock driver, but unfortunately they are too tied to bios to allow this, at least for the moment. Consequently this version is mostly a port of the first version to Ben's tree. Ben, please let me know what I have done wrong in terms of integration to your tree, as the main purpose of

This series adds support for reclocking on GK20A. The first two patches touch the clock subsystem to allow GK20A to operate, by making the presence of the thermal and voltage devices optional, and allowing pstates to be provided directly instead of being probed using the BIOS (which Tegra does not have). The last patch adds the GK20A clock device. Arguably the clock can be seen as a stripped-down

On 17 May 2014 02:43, "Ilia Mirkin" <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > Adds a NvReclock boolean option to allow the user to enable (or disable) > reclocking. All chipsets default to off, except NVAA/NVAC, which are > reportedly complete. Hey Ilia, I think I've expressed my thoughts on this previously via IRC, but let me stick them here too so there's a record

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/pwr.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 16 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnva3.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++-- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/pwr/fuc/memx.fuc | 111 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/pwr/fuc/os.h | 5 +

Although memory reclocking seems to be completely broken on my GF119, we can at least allow users to enable reclocking for the core clock. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgf100.c

Reclocking of NVAA/NVAC is substantially different from NV50+, enough to justify a separate clock implementation. This code is a forward-port of reclocking code that has been sitting in a branch for a while, and has been tested on my NVAC. Traces show no significant reasons why this shouldn't work on NVAA, but testers are always welcome. And since these are IGPs without dedicated RAM to

Following a series of patches that implement memory reclocking for NVA3/5/8 with DDR2, DDR3 and GDDR3 on board. I tested these patches on 6 different graphics cards, but I expect reclocking now to work on many more. Testers can pick up these patches and test it by enabling pstate (nouveau.pstate=1). They should then be able to change clocks by writing to /sys/class/drm/card0/device/pstate. Correct

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: [...] > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c > index 6ef8bf181b2d..f997a18f5760 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c > @@ -1133,10 +1133,14 @@

Hey Alex, Thanks. I have a couple of questions and remarks, but really, those should be treated as discussion points rather than anything else. Besides some inline comments, I was curious whether it is not necessary to pause PFIFO and the engines like done with at least NVA3-NVAF? Or is the transition smooth enough? op 10-07-14 09:34, Alexandre Courbot schreef: > Add support for

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- I decided to let the user still specify config=BLA=1 to override the hw disable in case we get something wrong or for double-checking stuff, but I suspect it won't really be used much. I'm not terribly fond of the message text, if you come up with something better, feel free to drop it in.

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Joseph D. Wagner <joe at josephdwagner.info> wrote: > When using the nouveau driver, my screen freezes (and stays frozen) when it > starts to more than a minimum amount of work. To fix this, I've been using > the nvidia driver with the Preferred Mode set to Prefer Maximum Performance. > > It looks like equivalent settings in nouveau are

When using the nouveau driver, my screen freezes (and stays frozen) when it starts to more than a minimum amount of work. To fix this, I've been using the nvidia driver with the Preferred Mode set to Prefer Maximum Performance. It looks like equivalent settings in nouveau are NvClkMode and NvMemExec. However, I didn't see any documentation specifying the valid options for these

There might be some callers of nouveau_clock_astate(), and they are from inetrrupt context. So we must ensure that this function can be atomic in that condition. This patch adds one parameter which is subsequently passed to nouveau_pstate_calc(). Therefore we can choose whether we want to wait for the pstate work's completion or not. Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> ---

Hi, This is a try to have some simple DVFS (Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling) support for GK20A. Instead of relying on other existing frequency scaling framework, we create a simple subdev in Nouveau for the same purpose. That's because we don't want to make the DVFS implementation for GK20A far more than enough in the beginning and hinder the implementation for dGPU in the future.

On 2016-12-16 12:52, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Joseph D. Wagner > <joe at josephdwagner.info> wrote: > >> When using the nouveau driver, my screen freezes (and stays frozen) >> when it >> starts to more than a minimum amount of work. To fix this, I've been >> using >> the nvidia driver with the Preferred Mode set to

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > Hello Ben, > > On 12/18/2014 05:34 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: >>> >>> This patch creates a subdev for DVFS (Dynamic Voltage and Frequency >>> Scaling) >>> support in Nouveau. This

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > This patch creates a subdev for DVFS (Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling) > support in Nouveau. This subdev refers to the status information provided by > the NVIDIA hardware and tries to adjust the performance level based on the > calculated target. Only the GK20A is supported right now. Hey Vince,

Following a series of patches to improve nouveaus clock tree parsing. Reclocking these engines (all but memory) is pretty stable on the cards I've tested. Please review and merge when approved. These patches do not solve the problem that core/shader engine doesn't like to be clocked up too far without fb following, with visible corruption as a result. I suspect this problem is unrelated

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- This patch relies on "drm/nouveau: remove >1 sclass support from nouveau_parent_create_". There are *many* *more* code paths without proper error handling - I counted at least 106 in 41 functions. If someone would like to do a bit of janitorial work I marked those code paths and uploaded "patch" here: