similar to: [Bug 77946] New: watchdog_overflow_callback hard CPU lockup

Hi, I used to experience kernel panics caused by CPUx hard lockup once almost everyday. I'm running Ubuntu 14.10 on vanilla linux kernel 3.19.2 on Core i7-3770 with Gallium 0.4 on NV108. The panic log looked like: [ 9227.509744] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9227.509750] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/watchdog.c:290 watchdog_overflow_callback+0x92/0xc0() [ 9227.509751] Watchdog

+ the same for shutdown threshold - seems impossible, but shutdown can fail. Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/therm/temp.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/therm/temp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/therm/temp.c index bf9b3ce..8f27b44

Hi Currently , I have doing some experimental work by using llvm, Is it possible to drop the machine code once it has been generated for particular function while program executing. For example some *void test(int)* function has been executed on native machine , I want to drop the code before I start execute some other function in my long running program. Thanks. With regards Sri.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76788 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76788 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Linux version 3.13 freezes X under nouveau GT 220 card QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter:

Hi Filip Thank you for your detailed explanation, I was actually looking to implement an adaptive approach which is basically when some function executed more frequently, I was trying to drop that function and compiled and linked with new optimized function. I just did the following - whenever some function executed more times , I called-back to program, so I that I

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70927 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70927 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: nv50_instobj_wr32 kernel panic Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: antoniovazquezblanco at gmail.com Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)

I can't reach digium.com or asterisk.org. Did I miss the memo? sean

When I run ./configure, it aborts with: checking for uuid_generate_random in -luuid... no checking for uuid_generate_random in -le2fs-uuid... no checking for uuid_generate_random... no configure: error: *** uuid support not found (this typically means the uuid development package is missing) But it *is* installed: [root at asterisk asterisk-12.2.0]# yum list installed | grep uuid uuid.i386

I am currently facing the following log output: Apr 26 16:40:28 h2290750 dovecot: auth: Error: pgsql(localhost): Connect failed to database mail: could not connect to server: Permission denied Apr 26 16:40:28 h2290750 dovecot: auth: Error: #011Is the server running on host "localhost" (::1) and accepting Apr 26 16:40:28 h2290750 dovecot: auth: Error: #011TCP/IP connections on port 5432?

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82714 --- Comment #24 from Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- With the GM206 driving the display, no special Nouveau options, I get this upon starting X: [ 545.904188] vgaarb: device changed decodes: PCI:0000:04:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=none [ 548.670462] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: timeout at

Is anyone frustrated by Network Manager? I wish CentOS just used the basic configuration files like the ones on BSD-style OSes. Those are so simple in comparison. Each time I reboot, it seems like the configuration file I create for Network Manager gets destroyed and replaced with a default file. Nothing in the default file would actually make sense on my network, so I'm not even really sure

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91413 Bug ID: 91413 Summary: INFO: task Xorg:2419 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 0:00 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2015 22:54 > > > > NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, > > 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 > > > > Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive,

NOTE: this is happening on Centos 6 x86_64, 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 not Centos 5 Dell PowerEdge 2970, Seagate SATA drive, non-raid. I have this server which has been dying randomly, with no logs. I had a tail -f over ssh for a week, when this just happened. Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel: mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort! (sc=ffff880057a0a080) Feb 8 00:10:21 thirteen-230 kernel:

As sysvol replication seems to be safest when using rsync, how can I determine the PDC (to avoid accidentally starting the replication on a slave)? Windows' ADUC has the "Operations Masters" window which shows them, how do I query this from within Samba? -- Mit freundlichen Gr??en, / Best Regards, Sven Schwedas Systemadministrator TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 |

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:00 PM, <libvirt-users-request@redhat.com> wrote: > Send libvirt-users mailing list submissions to > libvirt-users@redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >

On April 25, 2014 at 9:52:35 AM, Eric Christopher (echristo at gmail.com) wrote: Hi Michael, > I’d like to propose to extend LLVM IR intrinsics set, adding new ones for > safe-division. There are intrinsics for detecting overflow errors, like > sadd.with.overflow, and the intrinsics I’m proposing will augment this set. > > The new intrinsics will return a structure with two

On April 25, 2014 at 10:48:18 AM, Reid Kleckner (rnk at google.com) wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote: The sdiv operation in LLVM IR only makes sense for C and its very direct relatives.  The amount of control flow necessary to represent a safe division for any other language is ghastly.  (a/b) becomes something like (b != 0 ? ((a != INT_MIN ||

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz at gmail.com> wrote: > [ 326.168487] ====================================================== > [ 326.168491] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > [ 326.168496] 3.13.6 #1270 Not tainted > [ 326.168500] ------------------------------------------------------- > [ 326.168504] ldconfig/22297 is

I'm using Nas4Free, and I'm getting the following message all the time in the Daemon log: usbhid-ups[42466]: libusb_get_report: Unknown Error I'm running Nas4Free 9.2.0.1 Shigawire Driver usbhid-ups Nut Version is 2.7.1 Internal verion 0.38 UPS Info from Nas4Free Manufacturer:CP1500PFCLCD Model:CRCA102*AF1 The model UPS I'm running is a Cyber Power CP1500PFCLCD, other