similar to: [Bug 75279] XCloseDisplay() takes one minute around nouveau_dri.so, freezing Firefox startup

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75279 --- Comment #24 from Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #23) > Don't know if it is related, but I'm facing a plugin container hang and > nouveau seems to be guilty in some way. > > Got this thread with gdb : > > Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f4dd7b37940 (LWP 2961)): > #0

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75279 --- Comment #26 from Frederic Bezies <fredbezies at gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #24) [...] > > Seems to be stuck at the same spot with identical call stack, minus the > state tracker bits. > > The memory access message looks interesting, shame there is no indication of > what nouveau was doing to provoke this.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75279 --- Comment #27 from Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #26) [...] > It happens when I try to connect to my youtube account. And after 30 seconds > or so, plugin-container works as expected. > > Here is bt full log : > > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x00007fb478a49337 in sched_yield () from

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110414 Bug ID: 110414 Summary: mesa-vdpau 19.0.2 contains broken symlinks to libvdpau_gallium.so.1.0.0 Product: Mesa Version: 19.0 Hardware: Other OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

I recently replaced a 8600 GT with the above card on openSUSE Tumbleweed x86_64. The screen now flickers and when I change desktops it takes a some 10 to 15 seconds to display the new windows. e.g if I change from desktop 1 (konsole) to desktop 8 (thunderbird) it switches but konsole is displayed for 10 to 15 seconds before thunderbird appears. Occasionally the screen flickers wildly before

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77102 --- Comment #11 from Stefan Ringel <mail at stefanringel.de> --- (In reply to comment #10) > Would you mind booting with > > nouveau.debug=PBSP=trace > > and putting up a dmesg from that (after the vdpauinfo, that is). BTW, silly > question -- do you have a libvdpau_nouveau.so? yes I have libvdpau_nouveau.so. It is

Please provide your dmesg and xorg logs from the affected machine. Thanks, -ilia On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Sid Boyce <sboyce at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > I recently replaced a 8600 GT with the above card on openSUSE Tumbleweed > x86_64. > > The screen now flickers and when I change desktops it takes a some 10 to 15 > seconds to display the new windows. > e.g if

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail. > innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 >> > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> >> > >> > Has anyone tried the new flash

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75279 --- Comment #28 from Frederic Bezies <fredbezies at gmail.com> --- Some progress with debug packages. But I think I'll need xf86-video-nouveau debug package too. At least, here is the log : (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007f364503a337 in sched_yield () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007f3632d0e411 in

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to

How do I get a flash plugin to work with firefox? I thought that I installed it correctly, but I have yet to see any flash videos through firefox. I keep being told that I need an additional plugin. When I folow directions, I'm told I already have it? At least once, I was told I needed to upgrade. In case it helps, here is the output of yum provides '*flash*' | grep -e lash -e dobe

Ok. I hand-modified the linux-flashplugin6 shared library to remove all of the DT_NEEDED entries. I then modified flashpluginwrapper to add the following functions: void __assert_fail(const char *assertion, const char *file, unsigned int line, const char *function) { fprint (stderr, "%s:%d:%s: %s\n", file, line, function, assertion); abort (); } #include <ctype.h>

Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here. $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat [INVALID] /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$ 1474541270000:$

> Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's > pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign > of

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13689 Summary: nouveau is much slower than nv with flash player Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Hi all, I just installed a CentOS 5 machine from Kickstart. I configure NSS and PAM to lookup and authenticate users from LDAP with authconfig. On my LDAP I also have some automount configuration, but I'm not running automount on this server. SELinux is installed and enforcing. Whenever I try to install an RPM (and in other occasions during boot) I see those messages: # rpm -Uvh ... .rpm

On 04/26/2016 12:03 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello every one I installed the official > flash plugin from adobe > > About Plugins tells me: > > Datei: libflashplayer.so > Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so > Version: 11.2.202.577 > Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 > > But

J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: > > On 16/01/2020 20:37, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >>>> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so >>>> I went in search of an update. >>> Adobe stopped releasing Flash for

> James Pearson wrote: >> >> J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: >>> >>> On 16/01/2020 20:37, Steve Clark wrote: >>>> On 01/16/2020 03:30 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>>>> Once upon a time, Kay Schenk <kay.schenk at gmail.com> said: >>>>>> I kept getting messages that my old Flash Player 31 was obsolete so

Hello every one I installed the official flash plugin from adobe About Plugins tells me: Datei: libflashplayer.so Pfad: /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so Version: 11.2.202.577 Status: Aktiviert (STATE_VULNERABLE_UPDATE_AVAILABLE) Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 But it is: strings /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | grep 616