similar to: [Bug 75202] New: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - Nvidia GTX660 - Strange pink line on left screen side

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75203 Priority: medium Bug ID: 75203 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Asus Maximus IV GENE-Z - Nvidia GTX660 - Strange pink line on left screen side QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63165 Priority: medium Bug ID: 63165 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [GTX660] GPU lockups on 3D applications Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: miga-anyandall at hotmail.com Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)

On 12/12/2013 08:32, Matthias Nagel wrote: > Hello, > > I run the Gentoo Linux distribution and use a self-compiled Linux > 3.10.17 kernel. According to > > [1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/InstallDRM/ > [2] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/VideoAcceleration/ > > I need the original firmware from the binary driver in order to > sucessully use DRM and to

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Matthias Nagel <matthias.h.nagel at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I run the Gentoo Linux distribution and use a self-compiled Linux 3.10.17 > kernel. According to > > [1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/InstallDRM/ > [2] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/VideoAcceleration/ > > I need the original firmware from the binary

Hi Martin, if you refer to my kernel version. 3.10.17 is the latest, stable version in the official gentoo repository for the amd64 architeture. See here [4] https://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources?full_cat As long as I do not miss any features, I stay with the stable version. Hence, if I understand you correctly, there are kernel version (newer than some unknown point in

Hi, just a note for everybody who stumble across this thread in the future in order to bring this thread to a proper end. If I run the kernel with nouveau.debug="PVP=debug,PBSP=debug,PPPP=debug" I see messages about the firmware files gettings loaded. If the firmware files are missing, I get some warnings/errors. So far everything works as expected. But if I invoke

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75800 Priority: medium Bug ID: 75800 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NVE4] [GTX660Ti] Pink line on left side of monitor and slightly blurry areas on screen Severity: minor Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter:

Hello, I run the Gentoo Linux distribution and use a self-compiled Linux 3.10.17 kernel. According to [1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/InstallDRM/ [2] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/VideoAcceleration/ I need the original firmware from the binary driver in order to sucessully use DRM and to use VDPAU video acceleration. I used the python script from [2] and I had a look at the ebuild

Hello, I am using a GTX660, NVE6 (GK106) on arch linux. kernel 3.16.3 xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.11 I am loading an EDID with kernel parameter drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware= DVI-I-1:edid/320x240.bin It doesn't apply the resolution. dmesg prints: [ 65.382880] [drm] Got external EDID base block and 0 extensions from "edid/320x240vesa.bin" for connector "DVI-I-1" [

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98489 Bug ID: 98489 Summary: Nouveau not loading PGRAPH firmware blob for gk106 in kernel 4.7.10 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Dear List, Is it possible to simulate a time-series in R based on 1/f noise? Many Thanks Enrico Crema --------------------------------------- Enrico R. Crema PhD Candidate Institute of Archaeology, UCL AHRC Centre for the Evolution of Cultural Diversity, UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, UCL Personal Webpages: http://www.cecd.ucl.ac.uk/people/?go1=91

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 Bug ID: 102368 Summary: Since Archlinux testing migrate to mesa 17.1.7, I got a pink overlay in webcam software. Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Ok, so I think I've mis-represented what's really happening. > Ignore my previous statements concerning %add :) > > Again, given: > > 05: for.body: ; preds = %entry, > %for.body > 06: %j.04 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Here's how I'm evaluating the expression (in my head): > > 00: Add(ZeroExtend(Truncate(Minus(AddRec(Start=0,Step=3)[n],3), i8), i32),3) > | > 01: Add(ZeroExtend(Truncate(Minus(AddRec(Start=0,Step=3)[0],3), i8), i32),3) >

Ok, so I think I've mis-represented what's really happening. Ignore my previous statements concerning %add :) Again, given: 05: for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.body 06: %j.04 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ] 07: %result.03 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %for.body ] 08: %conv2 = and i32 %result.03, 255 09: %add = add nsw

I'm doing prediction of the survival cases using gene expression profiles(Affymetrix chips). Can somebody tell me how to use the Cox PH model to select genes and make a prediction of survival? Thanks. Guangchun

Dan, Thanks for the response ... On 12/17/2012 1:53 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I wanted to get some feedback on this patch for ScalarEvolution. >> >> It addresses a performance problem I am seeing for simple benchmark. >> >> Starting with this C

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Curtis <mcurtis at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > I wanted to get some feedback on this patch for ScalarEvolution. > > It addresses a performance problem I am seeing for simple benchmark. > > Starting with this C code: > > 01: signed char foo(void) > 02: { > 03: const int count = 8000; > 04: signed char

Hello, I am a new R user and have a question regarding dendrogram coloring. I would like to color each leaf in the dendrogram (dhc) according to a specific criterion. For me this criterion is the gene name. For this, I created a data.frame with 2 variables: The gene name and the corresponding color. Using the following function, adapted from "dendrapply {stats}", I still have the same

Hi,when I perform SAM on my array data(siggenes)I have some problems in retrieving the separate lists of up regulated and down regulated genes. When I write: fold<-function(x){ gruppi<-split(x,controllo) geni1<-abs(mean(gruppi[[2]])-mean(gruppi[[1]])) return(geni1) } fold<-esApply(expr.contr.tratt.4,1,fold)