similar to: [Bug 71172] New: Segfault when running glxinfo. NV25GL [Quadro4 900 XGL]

I've put a Nvidia Quadro card in my machine. It was first detected as Quadro4 200/400 NVS. I have the pigtail for dual monitors. I've tried tweaking the xorg file to get it working, to no avail. So I then downloaded the 9631 version driver from Nvidia. The readme for the newer files said that they didn't support this card. I run the installer, it builds the module, but gets

Hello, I'm using nouveau xf86-video-nouveau 0.0.10_git20091101-1 and nouveau-drm 0.0.15_20091120-1 under Arch Linux with xorg-server 1.7.3.901-1. My video card is recognized as "nVidia Corporation NV25GL [Quadro4 750 XGL]". X starts (with no apparent errors) but it's essentially unusable, since it's missing all the icons on all the panels and toolbars, and no text

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11038 Summary: nouveau and NV17: glxinfo, glxgears and other gl-apps crash Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28570 Francisco Jerez <currojerez at riseup.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Component|Server/general

Dear Centos Users We are running centos on our HPC. Indeed, we have a problem with running some software using X11 server such as pymol. For your information, we are using cygwin to access to the hpc (using ssh -X -Y username at xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) When we are testing glxinfo on my desktop, it gives us the following error: [username at hpc ~]# glxinfo name of display: localhost:10.0 X Error of

Hi, Just to say that this report may well seem a little sparse, but I really don't know what exactly to look for so if anybody needs extra information just shout and I will get it for you ASAP. When I check the X.org log file, it says direct rendering: enabled on my graphics device (it attaches its i810 driver to the kernel's i915 DRM device). This would appear to me to suggest that

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70212 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70212 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: glxinfo triggers assert in cso_release_all after 3f0627c2ad6 Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: awatry at gmail.com

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99968 Bug ID: 99968 Summary: [NV4C] System crashes reliably with glxinfo Product: Mesa Version: 12.0 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee:

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 03:59 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote: > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:15, David Reveman wrote: > > compiz is always accelerated as it's not drawing to a redirected window > > but to the root window. > > how is the redirected window stuff applying to direct rendering clients like > most probabely OpenGL games? Those windows are normally

So, you have Intel graphics? Which chipset? I hear the 915 isn't good enough for sketchup, but the 945 might be, though you may have to disable DRI. See http://wiki.winehq.org/GoogleSketchup for more info, look at the links section at the bottom.

hi, I am using xgl on opensuse-10.2 with the latest driver from nvidia. I generally works fine. The only issues is fullscreen xvideo. The way the xvideo extension is implemented causes high cpu load in the opengl driver. CPU: AMD64 processors, speed 1800.21 MHz (estimated) Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000

First - I'm 24 hours into having xgl and compriz going. (very nice) Second - I'm probably on the wrong list! Is it possible to render (capture?) an image in compriz/xgl that's a higher resolution than the screen output? The zoom plugin for compriz seems to use the native res and then enlarge - at least by default... Thanks, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

I've been avidly updating mesa, xgl, and compiz, every week (from the portage-xgl overlay) hoping to solve some of these problems: * Using ati-drivers-8.29.6 xgl crashes complaining about lacking dri, so i'm using 8.27.10. * Using 2.6.18 kernels, the ati-drivers-8.27.10 don't compile when building the drm module. * My laptop automatically switchs to vt1 when init services fail

Latest amd/ati drivers (8.37|8.38) supports composite with dri. So, after patching beryl (cause he can work without tfp) to make it use direct rendering on "aiglx method" and removed check for GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, which fails. - I was able to run beryl on fglrx WITHOUT Xgl. Only bug with windows drawing exists(as noticed in latest known issues for ati drives), more about this bug -

As posted few days ago by Vladimir, newer fglrx ATi proprietary drivers supports the Composite extension (also if it provides buggy rendering for some apps), that's why using the non-tftp rendering you could run Compiz in fglrx drivers too without loading Xgl. However the use-copy option makes compiz do some checks that the fglrx drivers don't pass (I don't know why, since the

I have a Dell Inspiron with the ATI x1400 video card. In Ubuntu 7.04 I ran Compiz-Fusion in XGL with the fglrx drivers and the system was very responsive. I noticed no performance penalties at all. In Ubuntu 8.04 I am running Compiz natively with the current fglrx drivers, and the system is sluggish. Disabling Compiz makes the system very responsive. So I am interested in running Compiz in XGL

Hi Did anybody see (s)RPM for Xgl? i would be a nice for my CentOS 4 workstation ... -- Petr Kl?ma e-mail: qaxi at seznam.cz

Hi all, have anybody already heard about Xgl? Do you know if there are rpm's for it? thx Nick -- Nicholas Anderson Administrador de Sistemas Unix LPIC-1 Certified Rede Fiocruz

Hi, As there has been some confusion over Xgl and Xorg here, I thought I'd just post this. XGL acts as a client to the Xserver and acts as a server for all programs connecting to itself. Instead of displaying its results on a monitor, it interprets the display and calls the appropriate OpenGL APIs; the OpenGL driver physically interacts with the screen, keyboard and mouse. So you do need

Hello. I know this is off topic but sorry I cannot google out where xgl people discuss things (don't find an xgl mailing list) nor documents about this. Currently xgl supports modern ATI/Nvidia cards, is there any reason why older cards are not supported? Is it because old cards are not powerful enough, or is it because xgl is using some new 3D technologies? (OpenGL 2.0?) How about cards