similar to: [Bug 70130] New: unable to compile fragment shader program

That's very odd. LoadPropagation should have picked that up even in its current form. Should try to figure out why it didn't and that is likely to "fix" a *lot* more situations. On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: > > > On 02.10.2016 20:03, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at

On 02.10.2016 20:26, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > That's very odd. LoadPropagation should have picked that up even in > its current form. Should try to figure out why it didn't and that is > likely to "fix" a *lot* more situations. Actually i was coming from an, given really constrained, addition to the LoadPropagation pass, where i was told to fix it within OP_MAD :/ > On

On 02.10.2016 20:03, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Tobias Klausmann > <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >> Previously we'd end up with an unnecessary mov for the thirs immediate value. >> >> total instructions in shared programs : 851881 -> 851864 (-0.00%) >> total gprs used in shared programs : 110295 -> 110295

I created a NFS VHD SR(\nfs\xxxx-yyyy-zzzz-wwww) on host “A” and created set of disks(vhds). I de-attached the SR from “A” and attached to host “B”. Host B seeing all the disks. Its working up to that fine. But I again de-attached the SR and attached to host A, it shows no disks in that SR. While reattaching to host “A” it shows the SR existing but after attached nothing comes. If I create

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96355 Bug ID: 96355 Summary: Performance: extra&costly SSBO validation even when SSBO aren't used Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

the problem is, that you also need to be able to save the TGSI into a file and run it rhough nouveau_compiler. Not really sure if it is worth the effort. Printing hex instead of numbers make more sense in this regard anyhow, because we are more precise and being able to debug some issues much better in the end. As long as the new version is still correctly parsed with nouveau_compiler, this change

Hi, yeah in the long run showing both in an ordered manner would be a nice thing to have! That would include patching the output and the tgsi parser (who wants to delete half the output to parse it again e.g. with nouveau_compiler). I can image an output similar to the one below: IMM[5] FLT32 { 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000} ^ IMM[5] FLT32 {0x00000019, 0x0000000f, 0x00000005,

Printing without this could lead to the following output, while the values are not exactly zero: IMM[5] FLT32 { 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000} IMM[6] FLT32 { 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000} IMM[7] FLT32 { 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000} when printing the values as hex, we can now see the differences: IMM[5] FLT32 {0x00000019, 0x0000000f, 0x00000005,

This looks like the saner approach, compared to changing tgsi_dump.c to display more fractional digits. Maybe there could be a second option to display as both float and hex? Reviewed-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> On 2017-11-14 — 15:11, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Printing without this could lead to the following output, while the values are > not exactly zero: >

Hi Tom, Thanks for taking the time to answer this. On 11-01-16 18:10, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've >> added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program >> to something which sort of looks like

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78161 Priority: medium Bug ID: 78161 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NV96] Artifacts in output of fragment program containing not unrolled loops with conditional break Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

On Tuesday 30 December 2008 15:30:35 Chris Lattner wrote: > On Dec 30, 2008, at 6:39 AM, Corbin Simpson wrote: > >> However, the special instrucions cannot directly be mapped to LLVM > >> IR, like > >> "min", the conversion involves in 'extract' the vector, create > >> less-than-compare, create 'select' instruction, and create

Hi. rsync 3.0.8 FreeBSD RELENG_4 i386. rsync -Haxi --delete /.../ /.../ The first pathspec above (residing on zz, a full filesystem) is: /vvvv/wwww/xxxx/zz/ The second pathspec above (residing on yyy, an empty filesystem) is: /vvvv/wwww/xxxx/yyy/zz/ It's obviously a 'copy everything over' operation. I've had to obfuscate the pathnames, however the exact pathlength throughout

Greetings, all. I've got a datafile I've been working with that has an ideosyncratic, heterogeneous format. It's grossly like: [...] DISKREAD,metadata about disks MEM,metadata about memory ZZZZ,observation-identifier,time,date DISKREAD,observation-identifier,data about disks MEM,observation-identifier,data about memory [ and repeat for each observation ] What I've done in

hi all when i setup plugin quota by quota = dict: mysql:/etc/quota-dict.conf i get the folowing error: deliver(zzzz at zzzz.zz): Unknown dict module: mysql deliver(zzzz at zzz.zz): dict quota: dict_init() failed quota-dict.conf: connect = host=localhost dbname=zzzz user=zzzz password=zzzz table = mailbox select_field = quota where_field = maildir username_field = username dovecot.conf: #

I have a classic domain. The PDC and BDC are Samba 3.6.25 on Solaris 11. I have two domain members also Samba 3.6.25 on Solaris 11. I have two domain members that are samba 4.1.17 on Fedora Core 21. LDAP backend for unix and samba accounts. in smb.conf on member servers idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 5000-6000 idmap config MYDOMAIN

Previously we'd end up with an unnecessary mov for the thirs immediate value. total instructions in shared programs : 851881 -> 851864 (-0.00%) total gprs used in shared programs : 110295 -> 110295 (0.00%) total local used in shared programs : 1020 -> 1020 (0.00%) local gpr inst bytes helped 0 0 17 17

Actually the problems that Tzu-Chien Chiu are encountering are similar to what should be done for generating SSE code in the X86 backend and also other SIMD instruction sets. I think LLVM neeeds to add instructions for permuting components, extracting and injecting elements in packed types. If the architecture has instructions which can do permutations for each instruction (for example

Hello, I'm having some trouble working on a webapp managing the imap tree on Dovecot. The same doesn't happen on other imap servers (e.g. Cyrus). Looks like if I receive shared folders from another user, and try to rename a folder in it, the rename command returns "ok", then if you list the new folder name, it isn't there. Looks like you've lost all the original folder

Each register is a 4-component (namely, r, g, b, a) vector register. They are actually defined as llvm packed [4xfloat]. The instruction: add_sat r0.a, r1_bias.xxyy, r3_x2.zzzz Explaination: '.a' is a writemask. only the specified component will be update '.xxyy' and '.zzzz' are swizzle masks, specify the component permutation, simliar to the Intel SSE permutation