similar to: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix ltcg memory corruptions

Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be uninitialized after suspend. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c index bcca883..7288940 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c +++

Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be uninitialized after suspend. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> wrote: > Some registers were not initialized in init, this causes them to be > uninitialized after suspend. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> > --- > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c

--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/ltcg.h | 7 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c | 55 +++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/vm/nvc0.c | 58 +++++++++- 4 files changed, 220 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git

Allocating type=0 marks the memory as free. This allows the ltcg memory to be allocated twice. Add a BUG_ON in core/mm.c to prevent this ever happening again. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/mm.c index d829172..7a4e089 100644 ---

v2: read, don't assume.. *puts on brown paper bag* --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c index a529563..e4940fb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c +++

This one-liner should fix build of the nouveau kernel module on 32-bit systems, as reported broken by "Rexilion" on IRC. As I don't have a 32-bit machine, I would like to ask for someone to test. Thanks! Roy

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com> wrote: > @@ -150,7 +151,10 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) > int ret; > > /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ > - priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram->size >> 17) / 4; > + if (pfb->ram) >

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have > no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far > works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for > the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. > > This patch

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have > no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far > works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for > the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. > > This patch

I have the following: MODEL: def self.get_tag_cloud Rails.cache.fetch(''fetish_tag_cloud'', :expires_in => 1.hour) do find(:all, :conditions => [ "approved_for_tag_cloud = true"], :order => "LTRIM(name)") end end CONTROLLER: def index @fetishes = Fetish.get_tag_cloud end VIEW: .... <% @fetishes.each do |fetish| -%>

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

Having a RAM device does not make sense for chips like GK20A which have no dedicated video memory. The dummy RAM device that we used so far works as a temporary band-aid, but in the long-term it is desirable for the driver to be able to work without any kind of VRAM. This patch adds a few conditionals in places where a RAM device was assumed to be present and allows some more objects to be

Kernel panic caused by list corruption in ltcg seems to indicate a concurrency issue. Take mutex of pfb like nv50_ram_put() to eliminate concurrency. Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramnvc0.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Kernel panic caused by list corruption in ltcg seems to indicate a concurrency issue. Take mutex of pfb like nv50_ram_put() to eliminate concurrency. V2: Separate critical section into separate function, avoid taking the lock twice on NVC0 Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/priv.h | 2 +-

Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to, and can trick

A series I have waited too long to submit, and the recent refactoring made me pay the price of my perfectionism, so here are the features that are at least completed Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to,

Thanks Ilia for the v2 review! Here is the v3 of this IOMMU support for GK20A series. Changes since v2: - Cleaner changes for ltc - Fixed typos in gk20a instmem IOMMU comments Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove

Hello, I need help with using ''default_url_options''. At least this is the function that I *think* is involved in the solution I seek. :) I''m deploying my rails app beneath an Apache ProxyPass setup. I''ve got it all working fine except that any rails tagging functions in my templates create absolute URL references. For example, this stylesheet function in my