similar to: how to get mongrel to use maintenance.html file?

forgive me if this has been resolved already... I have an app that is using sendfile to return large files to customers. We can''t use regular Apache to handle this static content since the files are what the customers are paying for - so it wouldn''t be cool for anyone else to get access to them. The issue is that the mongrel mem footprint gets bloated when the files are

My production server is using mongrel_rails on Ubuntu linux. With Firefox I can reach my production server with the URL: www.mydomain.com:3000/ but I can''t reach my production server with the URL www.mydomain.com/ Is there a way to configure mongrel so that I can reach my production server with the URL www.mydomain.com? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Fellow mongrelians, forgive a slightly off-topic rant; my hope is that it can lead to a better world. In the past few months, I have seen an increase in "anonymous" questions on this list, "anonymous" in the sense that the sender names do not resemble real human names, and also in the sense that the messages have not been signed. Just today, we have seen "Geek Moth

Hi, I''m doing development with Mongrel 1.0.1 on Ruby 1.8.4 / OS X 10.4.10, and I''ve found that often when I shut down my server with ^C, it hangs for a while, gobbling up all CPU. Sometimes it stops after a few seconds, sometimes it''s run for several minutes at least. This happens across all the apps I develop on, but it seems to hang longer after

I heard about a new mongrel plugin or version that''s single threaded and uses non-blocking IO with events. It''s called something like "swifty fly". Anyone have a link for it? Thanks.

Hello, For some reason when i change the "environments" line in mongrel_cluster.yml to use production, ActiveRecord Sessions stop working. Changing this line to development yield the correct result. Entries in database.yml are correct, and confirmed that the sessions table exists in both environments and that production is indeed working (production.logbeing filled up). Any idea why

Hello, sorry if creating a dupe... I''m trying to download files to authenticated users in my app. I''ve set up x_send_file. All seems to be correct to me, however when I try to download any file, I get a 1-byte long file downloaded. I am getting this already in development - so no Apache, no lighthttpd, just a mongrel_rails start in the root of my app. Any help/hint would be

Hi everyone. Does anyone have any preferences or ideas for an interface for SSL certificates, both client-side and server-side? At present, the only interface is EventMachine::Connection#start_tls, which uses a built-in self-signed cert on the server side. On the cilent side, it accepts any well-formed cert (that is, it doesn''t check that the remote cert is signed by a trusted authority).

Hi, I have read many articles on the net today about configuring Ruby on Rails on a Windows server. But there doesn''t seem to a one solution for all on how to configure a new Ruby on Rails server. So I can use some advise with this. I am using a Windows 2003 server and don''t get many request a day. But most of the request are quite heavy. The main focus is on optimizing the

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, my mongrel has crashed with following errors in the logfile: ** Starting Rails with development environment... ** Rails loaded. ** Loading any Rails specific GemPlugins ** Signals ready. TERM => stop. USR2 => restart. INT => stop (no restart). ** Rails signals registered. HUP => reload (without restart). It might not work well. ** Mongrel 1.1.3 available at 0.0.0.0:3000 **

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

I have a periodically_call_remote call in a partial running at 0.20 times a second. <%= periodically_call_remote(:update => ''ack_distance_output'', :frequency => 0.2, :url=>{:action => :ackAdjustDistance}) %> the action looks like this def ackAdjustDistance @calMessage = Calibration.getMessage

Hi, I''ve got an app which will only be dealing with a few requests a minute for most of the time, then will shoot up to a continuous 20 req/s for an hour at a time. We''ll potentially be running a lot of instances of this app on the same server. Is there any way to have additional instances of Mongrel be started when the existing instance(s) stopping being able to handle

I read this in a previous post ( http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-December/002354.html) .... First, Mongrel accepts remote clients and creates one Thread for each request. Mongrel also enforces a single request/response using Connect:close headers because Ruby only supports 1024 files (so far). If Mongrel doesn''t do this then people like yourself can write a simple

Hello Mongrels, Building on the last messages about Fastthread, can we get a detailed survey of the different ways people are deploying their applications? It will help with near-future Mongrel development. Please include the following things: * Framework, if any (Camping, Merb, Rails, Nitro, Ramaze, IOWA, Rack...) * Mongrel version * Mongrel handlers used (rails, dirhandler, camping,

I need to deal with a large file (about more than 2G [byte]) with eventmachine. I wrote a simple program with using "stream_file_data" as send a large file from client to server. But It didn''t work. Applying below a quick fix patch, I think it works well. Could you go over this patch? Regards, -- Kuroishi Mitsuo diff -rup

Sorry, for the re-post, but I''m new to the mailing list and wanted to bring back up and old topic I saw in the archives. http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2008-February/004991.html I think a patch to delay garbage collection and run it later is pretty important for high performance web applications. I do understand the trade-offs of having explicit vs. implicit garbage

Hello. I have discovered that mongrel does not correctly take on all the groups of the requested user/group combination. It seems that while the specified user and group is correctly activated, all the other groups that are associated with this user are not enabled and the group permissions remain the same as the caller (i.e. root). This problem (and solution) is discussed in the Ruby Forum:

Hi All, How to install and configure monitoring tools Nagios,lcinga,Zabbix and Ngnix on COS5 and COS6. -- *Thanks,* *Manikandan.C* *System Administrator*