similar to: Ground Truth

On Thu, May 17, 2018, 3:31 PM Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:22 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> On 5/17/2018 10:10 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>>

Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: > By address, I mean the selected location in the binary. I need the > ground truth for other static analyses. That's not determined until instructions are encoded for the object file, which is pretty deep down in MC. I can imagine a couple of ways to get the info you want, but it's not pretty. You could emit a label for every instruction, and then work

On 5/17/2018 12:22 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Friedman, Eli > <efriedma at codeaurora.org <mailto:efriedma at codeaurora.org>> wrote: > > On 5/17/2018 10:10 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hello, > > > I've looked around in the documentation, and I can't see >

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 5/17/2018 10:10 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> >> I've looked around in the documentation, and I can't see anywhere where >> there is a backend plugin capability for LLVM. I'd like to be able to get >> the output of the

If you can write what you want to output in C with asm statements, clang can show you what the IR should look like. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:35 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Program counter - EIP, RIP for x86/64. I need to obtain it and pass it as > an argument to the function that calculates an ordinal from it. > > I think that

Program counter - EIP, RIP for x86/64. I need to obtain it and pass it as an argument to the function that calculates an ordinal from it. I think that there must be some way to use the bitcode language to place byte values at a designated offset. Or use the command line to specify the section and offset for the data. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Brenda So <sogun3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:26:13 -0400 > From: Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [llvm-dev] Andresen Algorithm > Message-ID: > <CAK7rcp_yXA79UuLvcD6LPMQBvi9tTpOGAcuWZ > Ux1tFKTyvuh2Q at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >

The bitcode is only a representation of the IR, which is in SSA form. And SSA form assumes an infinite amount of registers, which is not offered by x86. When bitcode gets assembled/compiled to machine language, it breaks down the SSA form into non-SSA format. Personally I don't know how to use bitcode language to achieve what you want to do. The closest thing I can think of is the llvm-MC

Dear all, I'm wanting to do a series of comparisons among 4 categorical variables: a <- aggregate(y, list(var1, var2, var3, var4), sum) This gets me a very nice 2-dimensional data frame with one column per variable, BUT, as help for aggregate says, <<empty subsets are removed>>. I don't see in help(aggregate) how I can change this. In contrast, a <- tapply(y,

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com> wrote: > -llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, that list isn't in use anymore. > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to restrain the compiler that I build on my local box from >

Hi Kenneth, Can you elaborate what you mean by instruction pointer value? Like the actual instruction with opcode and operands? With the sample code that I showed you, the instrucrtion pointer in the innermost for loop will have access to the following functions: http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Instruction.html Alternatively, you can use the dump() operation to dump the instructions out.

Thank you so much! What about discovering the instruction pointer value? Also, does anybody know how to embed an artifact as a resource in a binary? I'd like to have two text sections, and have one copied in from another binary. On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Brenda So <sogun3 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > You can write it as if you are writing an optimization pass: >

Hello all, I would like to restrain the compiler that I build on my local box from picking all but a particular set of opcodes. Is there a way to accomplish this in a straightforward way? I'm pretty sure that there is a list of opcodes to semantics mappings. In addition, is there a way to look at an associative mapping of LLVM IR to opcode, and/or vice versa? -------------- next part

Hello, I've looked around in the documentation, and I can't see anywhere where there is a backend plugin capability for LLVM. I'd like to be able to get the output of the instruction selector along with the LLVM IR, or perhaps instrument that. Is there any capability to have a backend plugin in LLVM at all? Perhaps what is necessary is to manually drive the backend from the

This was intended to go to the mailing list :) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Maik Merten <maikmerten@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [Theora] troll or truth ? Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:40:00 +0100 Size: 1111 Url: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/attachments/20050323/5fe9d818/Theoratrollortruth-0001.mht

Does Puppet have any genuine concept of truth and nil that survives the interface with Ruby? has_variable? only returns false if a variable has never been assigned a value at all in the enclosing scope; there is no way to assign undef to a regular variable (as opposed to a resource parameter) within a scope and so make it undefined for the template. It would be a very useful thing to be able to

According to the documentation at http://docs.puppetlabs.com/puppet/2.7/reference/lang_conditional.html#if-statements, you can test for truth with syntax like this: if $is_virtual == ''true'' { AFAICT that''s not the case. The quotes around ''true'' make the comparison always fail. Here''s my test case class users {

Many people always complain no chance of success, it's because they didn't find opportunity's eyes. Opportunities will always exist, as long as you are good at capturing, it often is around you, on the way to success, if you don't have the patience to wait for the arrival of success, you have to use the lifetime of the patient to face failure. wholesalers (http://www.ebuybus.com)

Dear list, I think I'm being dense, but I can't get combn or expand.grid to give me this result. I need to generate a matrix of all 16 possible sequences of 4 boolean elements, 0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 ..... 1111 (in the end I'll have to assign NA to the 0s and some value to the 1s but let's keep it simple) OK, I could go the following route, but I feel like reinventing the

We have been experiencing static noise on one of our phone lines connected to our Adtran Total Access 750 which is then connected to a T100P card. I was convinced that, after rain storms, the static would get worse, it was surely a problem of Verizon's. Verizon sent a field rep out today and he told our secretary (I was busy) that there was a hard ground on the Ring portion of the line.