similar to: Nios 2 target code ownership

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Nios 2 target code ownership"

2017 Apr 12
2
[RFC] Nios II backend
Hi, I'm from Intel compiler department. I am proposing the integration of a backend targeting Nios II processor architecture. Nios II is a 32-bit general-purpose RISC processor core designed specifically for the Altera family of FPGAs. All information at about Nios II can be found at Altera website https://www.altera.com/products/processors/support.html, including the current ISA
2015 Jul 21
1
[LLVMdev] New linker ownership
> On Jul 19, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 19, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 18 July 2015 at 00:51, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >>> The goal of CODE_OWNERS.txt is to give high level >>> guidance for who to ask questions
2015 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] New linker ownership
On 18 July 2015 at 00:51, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > The goal of CODE_OWNERS.txt is to give high level > guidance for who to ask questions of, seek out for code review, find for > partnering up for collaborating on crazy ideas, etc.. The right person for a > great deal of that on LLD+Darwin is Lang, and it would be a shame to have > the official listing not
2017 Sep 19
0
nios-II ISA backend
Hi All, I would like to know what is status for nios-II target ISA backend for llvm. Do we have a stable version of nios-2 ISA backend ? Any pointers would be really helpful. Thanks in advance Vineet -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170919/0011d407/attachment.html>
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
On 11/12/2012 09:35 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote: >> On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >>>> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >>>> to sign up as
2014 Feb 14
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm] r201432 - Remove myself as owner of libc++
On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > Author: hhinnant > Date: Fri Feb 14 15:09:01 2014 > New Revision: 201432 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=201432&view=rev > Log: Remove myself as owner of libc++ > > Modified: > llvm/trunk/CODE_OWNERS.TXT > > Modified: llvm/trunk/CODE_OWNERS.TXT > URL:
2014 Feb 14
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [llvm] r201432 - Remove myself as owner of libc++
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 14, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> Author: hhinnant >>> Date: Fri Feb 14 15:09:01 2014 >>> New Revision: 201432 >>>
2012 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote: >> >> On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? >>>> I have been >>>> reworking the library call simplification
2012 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
Hi, On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote: > On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >>> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >>> to sign up as an owner for that. >> >> I think that "directory level"
2012 Nov 12
6
[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >> to sign up as an owner for that. > > I think that "directory level" is the right granularity. If you're interested in signing > up
2016 May 19
7
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership
As I’m sure many of you have noticed, I no longer have the time to be a proper code owner for SelectionDAG. In the interest of the project and to keep development running smoothly, I am resigning my code ownership. Justin Bogner has graciously volunteered to take it up. He has a strong history of LLVM contributions, a demonstrated commitment to good community development practices, and has
2016 May 23
3
Code owner for MSP430 target?
Who is a code owner for MSP430 target? I know that a lot of work on this target is done by Anton Korobeynikov (aka asl) but he is not listed as a code owner in CODE_OWNERS.TXT. I would like to get my D20162 reviewed, but I don't know who I can add as a reviewer.
2020 Mar 11
2
XCore target
Hello all. At XMOS we are working towards updating the upstream XCore backend for newer versions of the chip. XCore is the XMOS processor. The XCore backend was written by Richard Osborne at XMOS. Richard has moved on. The current code owner in CODE_OWNERS.TXT, Robert Lytton, has also moved on. For some years XMOS has developed the compiler in-house, for new versions of the chip, but not
2016 May 23
0
Code owner for MSP430 target?
Please CC me. I will review. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Vadzim Dambrouski via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Who is a code owner for MSP430 target? I know that a lot of work on this target is done by Anton Korobeynikov (aka asl) but he is not listed as a code owner in CODE_OWNERS.TXT. I would like to get my D20162 reviewed, but I don't know who I can add as a
2016 May 23
1
Code owner for MSP430 target?
Thank you. I don't know what CC means, but I will ping the diff so you can get an email. > On May 23, 2016, at 15:06, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Please CC me. I will review. > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Vadzim Dambrouski via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Who is a code owner for MSP430 target? I
2015 Jul 15
7
[LLVMdev] New linker ownership
Hi Rui, > so I'd like to be an owner of the new linkers (both for ELF and COFF), ... Sounds good to me. Do you mind if I add myself as a code owner for LLD Core / MachO, since I'll be continuing to work on that? Cheers, Lang. On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 15 July 2015 at 00:08, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>
2015 Dec 02
3
Code owner for Hexagon backend
Hello all, I’m planning to transition the code ownership of the Hexagon backend to Krzysztof Parzyszek. Krzysztof has done an excellent job of updating the Hexagon backend and engaging in community discussions (on the Hexagon backend and on other topics). He has a number of improvements planned for the Hexagon compiler and is an obvious choice for owning the Hexagon target. If there are no
2012 Nov 22
2
[LLVMdev] Code ownership - Target/Sparc
I would like to take ownership of Target/Sparc, if no one objects. Thanks, Venkatraman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121121/53828f4b/attachment.html>
2012 Nov 14
1
[LLVMdev] Target/NVPTX Ownership
Anyone against me taking code ownership of Target/NVPTX? -- Thanks, Justin Holewinski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121114/fb9d7b60/attachment.html>
2012 Nov 15
3
[LLVMdev] Code Ownership - Hexagon backend
Chris, I'd like to take code ownership of the Hexagon backend. Thanks -Anshu --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation