similar to: Mac downloads at http://releases.llvm.org/download.html recently requiring latest MacOS

I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1 binaries I've just uploaded have the same deployment target problem. Looking at the 5.0.0 and 6.0.0-rc1 binaries, I can confirm that their deployment target was too new: Load command 9

Hi Zac, Thanks for the heads-up. I've started targeting a minimum macOS deployment target of 10.9 for the release binaries. Hope this helps. Let me know if there are any issues. vedant > On May 1, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Zac Hansen via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The past few packages on http://releases.llvm.org/download.html

How is -mmacosx-version-min=10.9 being set? LLVM_COMPILE_FLAGS? Or CMAKE_CXX_COMPILE? > On May 2, 2018, at 19:22, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I described this off-list to Zac, but for anyone else who is following, simply specifying the target triple is not enough to have the build system set an older macOS deployment target. I.e the 6.0.0-rc1

Hello r-devel, The attached Code page 437-encoded file contains 245 characters (including the final newline), but readLines only reads 242 of them: > test_text <- readLines(file('437__characters.txt', encoding='437')) Warning message: In readLines(file("437__characters.txt", : incomplete final line found on '437__characters.txt' > test_text [1]

On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Paweł Bylica <pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: > Hi Paweł, > > > > Thanks for continuing this discussion. > > > > I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”.

Hi, Which of the various Wine downloads on the download page should I get for PCLinuxOS? Thanks. Stephen Carter

Hi Paweł, Thanks for continuing this discussion. I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”. Presently there are functions in the llvm::Triple class to access the environment as an enumeration of a fixed set of values. It seems that some non-enumerated values are already in use, but introducing possible combinations of

ping From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:10 AM To: Jim Grosbach; Pawel Bylica; Chris Lattner Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu (LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu) Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements Has anything more happened with this? -Andy From: Jim Grosbach [mailto:grosbach at apple.com] Sent:

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>wrote: > Hi Paweł,**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for continuing this discussion.**** > > ** ** > > I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the > ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”. Presently there are functions > in the llvm::Triple class to access

Has anything more happened with this? -Andy From: Jim Grosbach [mailto:grosbach at apple.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:51 AM To: Paweł Bylica; Chris Lattner Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu (LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu); Kaylor, Andrew Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Paweł Bylica <pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl<mailto:pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl>>

Chris, are you OK with the below changes to the Triple? -Jim On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:21 PM, "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: > ping > > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:10 AM > To: Jim Grosbach; Pawel Bylica; Chris Lattner > Cc: llvmdev

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>wrote: > > -------------------------------**** > > ELF Support on Windows**** > > -------------------------------**** > > **** > > There are various reasons that it would be nice to be able to support > generation of ELF objects on Windows through the MCJIT interface, one of >

Zac, Thanks for the input. This would cover it, however it is not stealth. In some cases, you may want it to be stealth. Again, my state allows me to do this, but some states do not. I've done a little searching and could not find an answer. Basically, to simplify the question: When is it legal to record interstate calls without giving notice, when the recording party is in a one-party

Anyone know of a provider that has 847 DID Numbers? I would like to connect with them via IAX2. Zac -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040512/bd98e86b/attachment.htm

Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty. The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for me: anyOf ( /* hasName("..."), */ hasName("...") ) though C++ not allowing

Hi all, I am receiving the error *Newton failed to find minimum* whilst trying to fit a move persistence model in this package. I think the error is related to the optimiser in the TMB package but it is beyond my statistics/coding knowledge to track down the specific cause and solution. I would appreciate it if anyone knew some resources to assist with fixing this. I have put a MRE and sample data

Hello, I am new to dovecot and I am initially trying to setup a basic imap proxy with password forwarding, I can start the dovecot service, connect and give it my password, and that is where I hang. My config is: root at imap-test:/etc/dovecot# doveconf -n # 2.0.19: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS auth_debug = yes auth_verbose = yes debug_log_path =

I was wondering if there is any objection to removing the 2-element minimum on the eachOf, anyOf and allOf matchers. It is frustrating when playing with matchers to have to edit significant amounts of code to be able to temporarily go from 2 to 1 matcher inside an any- or allOf matcher. And overall it feels very "un-set-theory"-like. The change was made here:

On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Chris, are you OK with the below changes to the Triple? If at all possible, I'd like to keep the triple changes separate (separate patch series and separate discussion) from the other MCJIT changes. How dependent are the MCJIT improvements on the Triple changes? As you've noticed, Triple is not a

For those of you who are either part of the secret cabal, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the cryptex is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.