similar to: LLVM opt unable to vectorize PolyBench code

It would help if you sent the IR you're giving to opt or at least a complete C function and your clang command line. ~Craig On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:05 PM, hameeza ahmed <hahmed2305 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I m unable to vectorize following kernel by opt tool; > > for (i = 0; i < _PB_NI; i++) > for (j = 0; j < _PB_NJ; j++) > { >

Hi, I would need some help to fix polybench/symm: void kernel_symm(int ni, int nj, DATA_TYPE alpha, DATA_TYPE beta, DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(C,NI,NJ,ni,nj), DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(A,NJ,NJ,nj,nj), DATA_TYPE POLYBENCH_2D(B,NI,NJ,ni,nj)) { int i, j, k; DATA_TYPE acc; /* C := alpha*A*B + beta*C, A is symetric */ for (i = 0; i < _PB_NI; i++) for (j = 0; j < _PB_NJ; j++) {

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Matthias

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I don't think that Clang/LLVM uses it by default on x86_64. If you're using -Ofast, however, that would explain it. I recommend looking at -O3 vs -O0 and make sure those are the same. -Ofast enables -ffast-math, which can legitimately cause differences. > The following tests pass at "-O3" and

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> > To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> > Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Sebastian Paul Pop" <s.pop at samsung.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, > "Matthias Braun" <matze at

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org> >>> To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> >>> Cc: "Hal

--- lib/hivex-internal.h | 8 +++++--- lib/utf16.c | 11 +++++++---- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/hivex-internal.h b/lib/hivex-internal.h index 4135f58..64fd49a 100644 --- a/lib/hivex-internal.h +++ b/lib/hivex-internal.h @@ -268,11 +268,13 @@ extern size_t * _hivex_return_offset_list (offset_list *list); extern void _hivex_print_offset_list

--- lib/write.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/write.c b/lib/write.c index dbb8292..8c4dd8e 100644 --- a/lib/write.c +++ b/lib/write.c @@ -608,9 +608,17 @@ hivex_node_add_child (hive_h *h, hive_node_h parent, const char *name) return 0; } + size_t recoded_name_len; + int use_utf16 = 0; +

I''m just looking into how to connect to Oracle using Rails. I''ve got everything connecting and working as it should. I have a Users table in Oracle: create_table "users", :force => true do |t| t.column "username", :string t.column "created_on", :datetime t.column "email", :string t.column "note", :text

Hi, after some experience with Rails on MySQL databases I gave it a try on one of our larger Oracle database. I was facing a problem when Rails tried to detect the columns for a model/table. The appropriate statement ran about 1 min which led to a timeout. Our Oracle guru told me to analyze the SYSTEM schema. After that hadn''t helped, he said the only remaining chance is to use a

libvorbis does not currently have any simd/vectorization. Following patches add generic framework for simd/vectorization and on top, add ARM-NEON simd vectorization using intrinsics. I was able to get over 34% performance improvement on my Beaglebone Black which is single Cortex-A8 based CPU. You can find more information on metrics and procedure I used to measure at

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > --- > lib/write.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/write.c b/lib/write.c > index dbb8292..72b1f8a 100644 > --- a/lib/write.c > +++ b/lib/write.c > @@ -608,9 +608,17 @@ hivex_node_add_child (hive_h *h,

Hi all, PolyBench (http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~pouchet/software/polybench/) is a well-known benchmark for polyhedral compiler. Since LLVM-Polly http://polly.llvm.org/) has provided a very good polyhedral optimizer for LLVM, could we add this benchmark to LLVM test-suite? I have attached the patch file to add PolyBench to LLVM test-suite. Best wishes, Star Tan -------------- next part

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e1 >> polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt, FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e0 >> What should be a good relative tolerance to set for these two tests? > > What's the minimum relative tolerance that you need for them to pass? Setting

Hi all, I'm attempting to convert all the pointers to arrays the mdct_backward function so it can be partitioned off for a hardware implementation. Although this code is quite short I'm finding it a little tricky. As it stands, mdct_backward is passed values by reference i.e. void mdct_backward(mdct_lookup *init, DATA_TYPE *in, DATA_TYPE *out) o my modified version starts void

On 06/08/2013 11:26 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, > > > PolyBench (http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~pouchet/software/polybench/) is a well-known benchmark for polyhedral compiler. Since LLVM-Polly http://polly.llvm.org/) has provided a very good polyhedral optimizer for LLVM, could we add this benchmark to LLVM test-suite? > > > I have attached the patch file to add

Hi all, We are trying to add Polybench[1] to the LLVM test suite. So far we have all but five benchmarks working fine. The problems we're having in those five benchmarks are due to gcc's versus clang's different ways to output 'Nan's. We are working to solve this. Although the patch is not ready yet to be included in the LLVM test suite, we would like to have some feedback

Hi all, I'm trying to get the llvm's IR from the source code of Polybench (OMP) https://github.com/cavazos-lab/PolyBench-ACC/tree/master/OpenMP. I noticed a considerable difference between the IR generated using clang -emit-llvm -fopenmp and clang -emit-llvm: * using the -fopenmp flag I get a simplified IR in which I read a single basic block where I can highlight a llvm.memcpy

Hi Douglas, > We are trying to add Polybench[1] to the LLVM test suite. So far we > have all but five benchmarks working fine. The problems we're having > in those five benchmarks are due to gcc's versus clang's different > ways to output 'Nan's. We are working to solve this. is it normal (i.e. valid) that they output NaN's differently, or is it a bug? Ciao,

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 20 October 2016 at 16:05, Sebastian Pop <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >> Setting FP_ABSTOLERANCE=1e-5, the two tests are passing >> when compiled with -Ofast for the following relative tolerance: >> >> polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/symm, FP_TOLERANCE=1e-10 >>