similar to: Call for Papers: ManLang 2018 (Sept. 10-14, Linz, Austria)

Dear Person That Posted This Email, Please be aware that calls for papers are only on-topic for this email list if they are specifically about LLVM. For example, a call for a workshop on LLVM in Scientific Computing would be on topic whereas a general compiler call for papers (like the one below) is not. That said, I hope you receive many strong submissions. Your conference looks

Hello, I have a dataset with proportions that vary around a fixed mean, is it possible to use betareg to look at variance in the dispersion parameter while keeping the mean fixed? I am very new to R but have tried the following: svec<-c(qlogis(mean(data1$scaled)),0,0,0) f<-betareg(scaled~-1 | expt_label + grouped_hpi, data=data1, link.phi="log",

[cross-posted to R-devel and bioc-devel] Hi, I am trying to implement a 'sort' method in one of the CRAN packages I am maintaining ('apcluster'). I started with using setMethod("sort", ...) in my package, which worked fine. Since many users of my package are from the bioinformatics field, I want to ensure that my package works smoothly with Bioconductor. The problem

I am using 'tm' package for text mining and facing an issue with finding the frequently occuring terms. From the definition it appears that findFreqTerms and minDocFreq are equivalent commands and both tries to identify the documents with terms appearing more than a specified threshold. However, I am getting drastically different results with both. I have given the results from both the

Hi, I just figured out that I accidentally posted my message in HTML, so I am retrying in plain text only. Sorry. I am currently extending one of our CRAN packages and ran into an unexpected problem when checking the source package. I got some warnings in the step "* checking for code/documentation mismatches". I double checked everything and did not see anything that would

Problem on flexmix when trying to apply signature developed in one model to a new sample. Dear R Users, R Core Team, I have a problem when trying to know the classification of the tested cases using two variables with the function of flexmix: After importing the database and creating a matrix: BM<-cbind(Data$var1,Data$var2) I see that the best model has 2 groups and use: ex2

That might be worth thinking about generally, but it would still be nice to have the base generics pre-defined, so that people are not copy and pasting the definitions everywhere, hoping that they stay consistent. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker@ucdavis.edu>wrote: > Perhaps a patch to R such that generics don't clobber each-other's method > tables

Estimados usarios de R: Tengo una base de datos madre en formato .sav de SPSS y la quiero modificar usando datos de otras base de datos .sav y otra en .csv a las que llamare hijos. No tengo problema en convertirlas en data.frame. Todos los archivos tienen en común una variable que es única. En aquellos casos que les falta un valor a una variable en el archivo madre lo relleno con el valor del

Hi everyone, I have a list betaMoments with 2 levels, e.g. > beta1 = list( + m = 4, + v = 5 + ) > beta2 = list( + m = 6, + v = 7 + ) > > betaMoments = list() > betaMoments[[1]] = beta1 > betaMoments[[2]] = beta2 and I have a matrix Names which has the same number of lines as the list has first level elements (here 2; beta1 and beta2). Now I need to make

That sounds like a problem. Just so I understand, do you mean there isn't the run-time support etc. to write back ends for the C++ language, or that the compiler IR is also somehow insufficient to write a code generator? --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Granville Barnett

Dear Duncan, Thank you a lot for your feedback. I have a problem though. The branch weights counters overflow in some files and thus I get incorrect numbers. Is there any way to find a workaround for that? Is is supposed to be a known bug or is it something that needs configuration on my part? Again, thank you a lot for your reply. Best Regards, Georgios Zacharopoulos 2016-02-03 18:23

Hello everybody My collegue and I noticed a strange behaviour of R on different platforms. It's a simple computation, but results are rather different. On Windows XP: > floor(log(8,2)) [1] 3 which is what one should expect. Here's instead the result with Mac OS X (same version, 2.5.0 (2007-04-23)) > floor(log(8,2)) [1] 2 Is it a "bug" in R or in the operating

Dear Duncan, I am generating branch-weights annotated IR files as described in the documentation of LLVM, using profiling with instrumentation. http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#profiling-with-instrumentation e.g. llvm-profdata merge -output=$(BENCH).profdata default.profraw > clang -S -emit-llvm -O3 -fprofile-instr-use=$(BENCH).profdata -o > bench.prof.ll bench.c The issue is

Hi all, I need to do massive simulations in the next two years. I estimated that I will need about 64GB memory, if I do not want to split up the calculations. Additionally I would like to have it as fast as possible. Can R handle multi-core processors and can all standard operating systems handle the same amount of memory and speed? Perhaps someone could point me to a webshop that sales

When you create a parser via ANTLR you specify the output language of the resulting recursive descent parser, at the moment there exists no C++ output template to my knowledge, thus you would have to generate the parser as C code for which a template exists. The runtime support should be there, at least partially but it won't use things like exceptions, nor will it have a very modular design

Hi, I have a dataset that looks like the one below. data plot plantno. species H 31 ABC D 2 DEF Y 54 GFE E 12 ERF Y 98 FVD H 4 JKU J 7 JFG A 55 EGD . . . . . . .

Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this list. El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer" <bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at> > escribi?: > > Dear colleagues, dear members of

Dear All, I carry out negative binomial estimations using the glm.nb command from the MASS package. Is there a command or a simple procedure for computing marginal effects from a glm.nb fitted object? If these are the same as for a Poisson fitted object (glm), my question remains how to compute them. Thanks in advance for your help. Roberto Patuelli ******************** Roberto Patuelli, Ph.D.

Dear All, I would like to analyse the residuals from a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that I estimated, with random effects, by means of the command glmmPQL, from the MASS package. It is not very clear to me what the actual residuals to analyse are (Y - Yhat): I obtain two columns of residuals, of which the first are population residuals, and the second refer to the grouping used in the

Dear All, I've been using already for a year glm.nb() from the MASS package. But today, R gave me an error message when estimating one of my usual models: > depEsf.nb <- glm.nb(depE ~ manuf00E + corps00E + lngdp00E + lngdp00sqE + > lnpop00E + indshE + scishE + mechshE + elecshE + chemshE + drugshE + > urban_dummyE + aggl_dummyE + + eE1 + eE2 + eE3 + eE4 + eE5 + eE6 + eE7 +